I don't know why I am surprised, because she never changes :
Fripps Farm did ask for donations, as any charity and CIC regularly do as part of their business model. However, there were no concerns around the finances as the rescue had a guaranteed income every month and a constant increase in donations. Furthermore, they had acquired a very famous, multimillionaire Patreon who would step in and help financially, should they require this. They were currently working on the publicity to announce them.
1. What is the amount and source of the existing "guaranteed income"?
2. It's good if you do indeed have a "multimillionaire Patreon", but what would that person's fame have to do with anything? Fame is useful for publicity (but note; double-edged sword), and a wealthy "Patreon" is helpful to underwrite against shortfalls in donations. But most likely anyone willing to underwrite Fripps would have to be ignorant or blind to the failures at Fripps - and if indeed thay are wealthy, why the
duck wouldn't Fripps change to become better / more professional. Answer - any such patron would have to be wealthy
and stupid.
3. She's stil behaving like a teenager; impressed by fame and seemingly chasing it whilst definintely not chasing it, no.
The DWA panel must have been so frustrated at having an unprepared gobshite with the mentality of a teenager turn up to the first meeting, only to have her rant about fame and bullies at the second. So they, as the adults in the room got to spend their time nudging a juvenlie that is unwilling to listen and learn into the direction of doing things properly.
I imagine that the description of her "Pateron" is a feeble excuse that she came up with when she realised that they weren't responding positively; she remembered that she'd sent a message to Elton John two years ago and never heard back, but still lives in hope.
To be clear, what she is claiming is an underwriter. That would be fine, if such a person exists, but I doubt that that person sees things the same way as Jodie. Maybe Gemma Collins agreed to do some publicity for Jodie when asked some months or years ago, and she somehow thinks that this is a magic bullet. I don't really expect to hear any more about this (sweepstake, anyone?), but if we do, it will no doubt be an underwhelming social media
hole nonebrity who got dragged into it on account of JM's misrepresentations.
---
This was posted two hours ago
Has anyone got any decent, recent photos?
There's the sex noises video but I guess that would count as
not suitable indecent.