Folks, hear me out... while I agree that going on and on about not being a smoker can be tacky and insensitive, it still makes sense to make a distinction between the two situations. My father started smoking at the age of 13 and ended up dying of lung cancer at 75 after being a chain smoker all his life. Like most smokers, he had a mix of delusions, magical thinking, denial, and philosophical ideas - we all gotta die somehow, right? When he got diagnosed, he didn't want to be blamed for his choice and even said that if he could go back in time knowing how bad it was (when he started smoking cigarettes, back in the day they didn't know that it was bad for you but then he had decades to try and quit and he didn't), he would still smoke. My friend (a nurse), a heavy smoker, also feels the same way. He knows the risks and consequences of smoking but accepts it’s a personal choice. However, Jenny did care about her health and was just unlucky enough to get lung cancer even though she never smoked. It's a different scenario and while of course no one is saying that smokers deserve to suffer and die for their choices, it's fair to say that getting lung cancer as a result of smoking is just a predictable consequence of self-destructive behaviour while getting it for no reason seems unfair.
BTW I couldn't bring myself to watch the memorial service, I tried but my brain started bleeding 1 minute in, LOL. Happy new year everyone!