Israeli - Palestinian Conflict #20

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Dogmuck said:
Well this comes as a surprise to absolutely nobody. Not the US back peddling. So fk all has happened and that pathetic letter was all about getting votes! They are making a mockery of themselves



---
Tom holds him to account too! They US just look stupid at this point

Click to expand...

Patel strikes again they make me sick they’re all a bunch of egotistical psychopaths 🤮
 
www.miragenews.com

UNSC Warned: Famine Looms in N. Gaza, Ceasefire Urged

Speakers urged the Security Council today to prevent northern Gaza's descent into famine amid relentless death and destruction, as the 15-member body
www.miragenews.com www.miragenews.com

It appears that the Israeli response, in a rather familiar tune, is that it's all lies, but of course it would be unacceptable to allow outside media or fact-checkers in. We just have to believe them that they're not committing war crimes. Just like all the other war crimes the evidence supports occurred that aren't war crimes because they said so.
 
Lammington said:
www.miragenews.com

UNSC Warned: Famine Looms in N. Gaza, Ceasefire Urged

Speakers urged the Security Council today to prevent northern Gaza's descent into famine amid relentless death and destruction, as the 15-member body
www.miragenews.com www.miragenews.com

It appears that the Israeli response, in a rather familiar tune, is that it's all lies, but of course it would be unacceptable to allow outside media or fact-checkers in. We just have to believe them that they're not committing war crimes. Just like all the other war crimes the evidence supports occurred that aren't war crimes because they said so.
Click to expand...
They’re evil I read an article in the Israeli press yesterday discussing how they could spin the devastation in Gaza to the international community playing victim AGAIN saying that they would be blamed for it you couldn’t make this 💩 up and the comments are even worse they really are despicable I’ll see if I can find it.
m.jpost.com

Israel’s challenge: Explaining how Hamas’ war led to destruction of Gaza - analysis

Jabaliya is a dense urban area with multi-story buildings lining streets that curve along low hills. It is connected to other neighborhoods and towns, such as Beit Lahiya and Beit Hanoun.
m.jpost.com m.jpost.com
 
IdeletedbutI'mbackagain said:
What makes me laugh is that this genocide lost the Democrats the election and they can not admit it.
Click to expand...
It's astounding to me. Mention it as one of the reasons and you're either shut down ('there's no genocide') or you're stupid for not supporting the Dems over Trump regardless. People really, really don't want to talk about it.

ETA - Biden responding to a question from someone from Israel's Channel 13 news.



Further ETA - probably shouldn't clog up the thread with this one hearing, but I keep seeing these clips -

 
Last edited:
Shocking at PMQs just now - "Article 2 of the United Nations genocide convention makes it explicitly clear that genocide is not about numbers, it's about intent. And the intent of the Israeli government and the IDF has been explicitly clear in words and in actions over the past 400 days - more than 45,000 men women and children killed. On the 28th of October the foreign secretary denied that a genocide was even taking place, and suggested that the Israeli army had not yet killed enough Palestinians to constitute a genocide. Last week at PMQs the Prime Minister stated that he has never referred to the atrocities happening in Gaza as a genocide. Will the Prime Minister share his definition of genocide with this house and will he say what further action he's prepared to take to save lives of desperate and starving men, women and children, given that we now hold the presidency of the United Nations security council."

Starmer's response - "It would be wise to start a question like that by reference to what happened in October of last year. I'm well aware of the definition of genocide and that is why I've never described this and referred to it as genocide."

ETA -

 
Veronicaaa said:
Shocking at PMQs just now - "Article 2 of the United Nations genocide convention makes it explicitly clear that genocide is not about numbers, it's about intent. And the intent of the Israeli government and the IDF has been explicitly clear in words and in actions over the past 400 days - more than 45,000 men women and children killed. On the 28th of October the foreign secretary denied that a genocide was even taking place, and suggested that the Israeli army had not yet killed enough Palestinians to constitute a genocide. Last week at PMQs the Prime Minister stated that he has never referred to the atrocities happening in Gaza as a genocide. Will the Prime Minister share his definition of genocide with this house and will he say what further action he's prepared to take to save lives of desperate and starving men, women and children, given that we now hold the presidency of the United Nations security council."

Starmer's response - "It would be wise to start a question like that by reference to what happened in October of last year. I'm well aware of the definition of genocide and that is why I've never described this and referred to it as genocide."
Click to expand...
duck Starmer that evil, evil weasel of a man. I wish only bad things for him and all those like them. May he never have a solid nights sleep for the remainder of his life.
 
Veronicaaa said:
I'm actually stunned at the cruelty of Starmer's response. Not bothering with even lip service to the tens of thousands killed. The child amputees. The doctors tortured. I'm lost for words.
Click to expand...
He’s cocky he knows that with trump in charge nobody will see the inside of a courtroom or be held accountable for this GENOCIDE because Trump has the most pro Zionist staff in the history of the country.
 
I used to work for the guy, he’s a bellend! Nasty, smug, arrogant, two faced, duplicitous are just some of the words that spring to mind when I hear his name. As a lifelong labour supporter I couldn’t vote for him because I know the type of character he is and not one ounce of him represents the labour values I was taught, he may have the name of the founder of the party and that’s where the similarities end, but I certainly couldn’t when I saw what he did to Corbyn! The guy is a bleep! Soz not soz bell end is too nice!
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top