You’re right and whether she’s a wronged woman or not, she will have to repay at least a portion of what she has taken. My ex stole and hid all sorts of things after we split but their value was assumed from the date of separation. He is still furious that he had to repay my share. I assume Alice will have to do the same.the money was in the joint account. Which one would normally assume is used for day to day family spending. He probably put lump sums in because that’s the way he earned.
It’s not a savings account or a personal account. Removing it on the basis she believed it was hers alone was all kinds of stupid. Before children and marriage she didnt earn enough to save this kind of money unless she was living entirely off him. Which we can assume to be the case. It was her slush fund and was probably used when money was tight and she couldn’t get blood out of a stone. In other words she spent it with the marriage as living expenses.
But she decided it was hers along with money from his personal account.
You do not keep college funds or savings in joint current accounts. She doesn’t have a keg to stand on. Everyone knows that and it’s a question of whether you think she is a thief or a wronged women who deserved to steal.
I very much appreciate you bringing that to my attention.Hope you don’t think I was being picky ❤
Ioan can’t take a full on job at the moment, at least not one filming outside LA. He’s a professional actor and would not want to risk having to close production because Alice did something crazy.
I know the house sale should have been quicker but I’m sure he’d do anything to avoid the girls the trauma of forcibly removed from the property and / or their mother.
I’m sure people will think he’s deliberately not working for financial reasons but he doesn’t really have a choice.
Oh 100%, pity the like the person we’re here discussing doesn’t have the same values, good old mAlice!!I very much appreciate you bringing that to my attention.
I've always been one to own my mistakes/errors, try to give credit to others when it is due, and to never take credit for something I've not done.
And to correct another oversight of mine:Oh 100%, pity the like the person we’re here discussing doesn’t have the same values, good old mAlice!!
It's the entitlement, it's mind boggling and you just know that she's done it completely out of spite. I've never seen anyone set out to destroy someone so much but destroy themselves in the process.The whole issue is that for nearly 2 years Alice has lived the high life in a large house with a pool and living with an open card. But she should have realised that from the day he left, everything that cost money was her responsibility and he would help her out some. That’s not what happened. She just continued to live as if he was still paying for everything. Massive mistake
Dear Alice: Tattlers have been telling you to go walking since 2021. Outdoor walking is preferable with the fresh air and nature and just getting you out of the house, but even hopping onto your expensive piece of equipment you own would be a start. It's nice to finally see you admitting you should get back to doing this. Although, just the other day you were on about you being too ill to walk, to leave your bed or sofa, always in a flare-up from one of your self-diagnosed illnesses. That you're 54. You act like 54 is an excuse. It's more important than ever for women over 50 to be moving and to also be doing strengthening exercises because of the amount of muscle they lose yearly if they don't. So many excuses, Alice. There are many places in the surrounding area and/or areas where you live where you could go walking with your kids or without since you don't have a job and have plenty of time during the day.he was checking if you've ruined his career yet
View attachment 1791455 q
she mentioned before that she can't walk without her walking partner (Ioan)
View attachment 1791456 q
Proof please mAlice.Alice said Ioan earned $500,000 not $20,000 this year.
I have to say I am fascinated by this "carried and pushed out the babies" justification for her entitlement to be indefinitely financially supported… i mean we all discussed that brand of (mostly) women (and Lupine) who believe aec husbands owe them forever but these physiological details are intriguing: say, if it was caesarean and no pushing out occurred would they be less entitled?TLDR / recap of the last thread
Alice is still a lying grifting bleep.
As for Fizzplops:
"Tattlers! I was suddenly banned from your forum because either one of you is a Mod or one or more of you run to the mods for bans - and then keep schtum and pretend the poster 'dirty deleted' or ran away. Rotten!
"Interesting comment below, maybe they've both been lying: "Dude is lying too. If he only makes 30k-50k or so a year, he can get on the Affordable Care Act for less than $300 for the entire family. I know this because I am a contractor as well." Ioan earns more in 'residuals' than a lot of people earn from full time work. Both of them are just used to the high life.
How would Fizzplops know what IG gets in residuals???
"Yeah, he's skilfully been honest but deceptive there.
Which is it plops??
"Nah, she carried and pushed out the babies, he didn't.
Translation = AE is entitled to sit on her arse for life.
"To be fair, it looks like he has been paying all the bills - at least until April this year and I think he probably still paid a lot after that. He's submitted specific stuff which would not be a good idea too if it wasn't true/he hadn't been paying. It's looking like Alice has been rather 'loose' with financial truths.
Sounds reasonable? An FM trying to be fair or Alice trying to throw us off the scent...
I know that autocorrect made leg into keg…but ‘she doesn’t have a keg to stand on’ did make me laugh! I’m sure Alice has plenty of kegs.the money was in the joint account. Which one would normally assume is used for day to day family spending. He probably put lump sums in because that’s the way he earned.
It’s not a savings account or a personal account. Removing it on the basis she believed it was hers alone was all kinds of stupid. Before children and marriage she didnt earn enough to save this kind of money unless she was living entirely off him. Which we can assume to be the case. It was her slush fund and was probably used when money was tight and she couldn’t get blood out of a stone. In other words she spent it with the marriage as living expenses.
But she decided it was hers along with money from his personal account.
You do not keep college funds or savings in joint current accounts. She doesn’t have a keg to stand on. Everyone knows that and it’s a question of whether you think she is a thief or a wronged women who deserved to steal.
I thought it was intentional I roared with laughterI know that autocorrect made leg into keg…but ‘she doesn’t have a keg to stand on’ did make me laugh! I’m sure Alice has plenty of kegs.
Yeah pushing a baby out of your mimsy or have a c-section makes absolutely no difference to your level of motherhood. It’s not like Scientology were the more you do it the higher your thetan level. Otherwise I’d be John TravoltaI have to say I am fascinated by this "carried and pushed out the babies" justification for her entitlement to be indefinitely financially supported… i mean we all discussed that brand of (mostly) women (and Lupine) who believe aec husbands owe them forever but these physiological details are intriguing: say, if it was caesarean and no pushing out occurred would they be less entitled?