Thread 4I thought I had read all the threads but I've obviously skipped some, what thread is a lozz in please?
You don’t know himThe duck? Calling someone a rapist is a huge accusation!
Spencer is the biggest wet wipe on the planet, from old photos we know he was a bit of a lad in his younger days but christ I find that really, really hard to believe.
He wasn’t at all a wet wipe before Imo. The absolute opposite. duck knows what’s happened to him. Brain transplant it seems.The duck? Calling someone a rapist is a huge accusation!
Spencer is the biggest wet wipe on the planet, from old photos we know he was a bit of a lad in his younger days but christ I find that really, really hard to believe.
Thank you XThread 4
I wish you could tell us more stuffWhat we are seeing is probably all lies anyway. Wrecking houses and stealing phones aren’t tell tell signs of happy clappy innocent relationship are they
I rolled my eyes so hard at that bit!!! Just duck off with your fake gratitude ImoI got to the ‘so grateful for food comment’ in her latest video and had to switch off. And what the duck is that hair?? Curly underneath and then frizzy crimping at the top?! She really gets under my skin
It's unethical for sure, but not against the law...as long as she pays income tax on the money she gets for themThis girl literally sold Like 6 sunglasses from the same company “quay Australia “ at one time so it’s clear she for PR box with them and didn’t like the items .
I wish someone explained to her that it’s against the law to do that but she think it’s complaining
I heard somewhere it was against the law to resell your PRIt's unethical for sure, but not against the law...as long as she pays income tax on the money she gets for them
Not in the UK, there's just tax implications to consider. I don't know what the law & tax implications are in other countries though, so it may be illegal elsewhereI heard somewhere it was against the law to resell your PR
Ah ok .. maybe not illegal but against PR terms .Not in the UK, there's just tax implications to consider. I don't know what the law & tax implications are in other countries though, so it may be illegal elsewhere
You can’t go around calling people an actual weirdo (alozz I’m looking at you, not that I even know who you are ) without solid evidence, he is a bleep I’ll tell you that I’ve seen it with my bare eyes and with friends and friends of friends. The girls he did all this stuff to were young but of age. I’m only adding this in as if this was put on wiki about him we don’t know the consequences of these claims.
He is definitely a weirdo. The word got changed. But just to clarify I mean there is no evidence from my understanding that the girls were underage. People kill themselves over these sorts of accusations and I don’t want that coming from my tea