Look I am in no way saying what he said was even morally correct, because it’s not. At all, I am not even defending him in the slightest because I find the whole thing completely sickening. However by calling him a weirdo, he can instantly deny that. Which I was responding to the other poster, in regards to certain things said that could potentially help the Ingham’s. In the eyes of the UK law, he is not classed as a paedophile and from that point people had started to make assumptions about what he was like with the girls, which again helps them by complaining about the rumours being spread.. because that is all speculation.
(Again this was in reply to another commenter but yes regardless of context there is no reason a 30+ year old man should be messaging teens)
Spot on. Blurring the lines between when a person is or isn't a pedophile is not helping anyone but Chris. There is a huge misconception around that word and many people use it for adults who are attracted to children 14 and up. We all know there is a fine line here, but the law is the law, and you cannot be legally charged with being a pedophile once victims are over 13 years of age
If people hadn't used that word it's very unlikely we would have got a 22 minute pity Chris video, or one of any length for that matter