IFAM#12 Australia? Florida? Nope. Welcome to Mabelthorpe as Chris goes on a midnight grope (Ingham Family)

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Web30 said:
Haven holidays are typically monday to friday, so prob planned.
Click to expand...
I think it also was planned, cause they have said in a few of the first vlogs that it is their home for a few days. I thought it was cause they could not stand staying at a caravan for any longer, or getting more out of such a small place. Not their standards of slides and rides.
 
My sister has just arrived at Skegness butlins today with my niece . I have rung her and warned her because she would not want my niece anywhere near him and his vlogs!
If he is filming where he shouldn’t be my brother in law will be having no words with him!
 
Doobeedoo said:
My sister has just arrived at Skegness butlins today with my niece . I have rung her and warned her because she would not want my niece anywhere near him and his vlogs!
If he is filming where he shouldn’t be my brother in law will be having no words with him!
Click to expand...
No dogs allowed. Unless they had a friend with a caravan there...but this is the Inghams we are talking about.

Your sister and family can enjoy their holiday in peace
 
Web30 said:
You can see the butlins tent in the background of the video
Click to expand...
Shouldn't be Butlins only owners with private caravans on site can take dogs.

Butlins are really good to the privately owned caravan peeps and they can hardly say you can't take a dog per se... To someone who may hypothetically practically live there through the summer months!
 
I can't believe the sheer audacity of Chris and Sarah. Who do they think they are? They shouldn't be using footage of other children especially with their reputation. Who knows what that creepy fucker would do with clips of kids in swimming suits .... Like where could they end up?? Secondly if they were using other kids they should have them blurred out unless they have parental permission and make a point of mentioning they have permission. Surely by now creepy has learned to blur out people!? Maybe he could use his previously allocated midnight skinny dipping times to knuckle down and actually learn how to edit? I wonder did he wear his t shirt in the pool to hide his moobs?? Makes me sick
 
Apollo111 said:
I can't believe the sheer audacity of Chris and Sarah. Who do they think they are? They shouldn't be using footage of other children especially with their reputation. Who knows what that creepy fucker would do with clips of kids in swimming suits .... Like where could they end up?? Secondly if they were using other kids they should have them blurred out unless they have parental permission and make a point of mentioning they have permission. Surely by now creepy has learned to blur out people!? Maybe he could use his previously allocated midnight skinny dipping times to knuckle down and actually learn how to edit? I wonder did he wear his t shirt in the pool to hide his moobs?? Makes me sick
Click to expand...
I’m pretty sure the T shirt is there to cover up his true ginger coloured hair, Lazy made a comment in one vlog that he covers up for decency! So it’s ok to film and broadcast to hundreds of thousands of people, unsuspecting individuals who’ve gone swimming Chris but you make sure nothing you don’t want to be exposed is all covered up?’ I still think it’s a weird kink to do with water, like the exact opposite to how he is in daily life, swimming in his clothes (he’d probably wear his greasy beanie if he got a chance) but in secret it’s skinny dipping and baths and towels, I’m sorry but go pro or no go pro if I saw him in 10 feet of a swimming pool I’d be marching myself and my kids straight in the other direction. As I said everyone that has ever used a UK public swimming pool in their lives will have seen the copious no filming or photography signs, for him to even question that they may or may not let him film in itself is all a load of bollocks!
 
Clarabelle76 said:
for him to even question that they may or may not let him film in itself is all a load of bollocks!
Click to expand...

He’s a celeb though isn’t he! Remember this is someone who thinks he’s irresistible to teenage girls by using all his silly phrases and not forgetting he’s one of the main characters in the uks most soooper doooper vlogging family ?
Seriously though it wouldn’t surprise me if he genuinely did think it’d be okay to film. He probably is still deluded enough to think that companies want them to advertise them in their ‘wholesome family vlogs’
 
FamHam said:
Really since the 40s? I do remember my parents taking photos at the pool (during competitions) in the 80s and I thought it was a more recent rule. Along with the no photos at school plays.

I do think in general people worry too much about a pedofile on every corner these days and feel sad that some children are never allowed to play on the street like we used to, but with ginger Chris there is a reason to worry. Not that I'm saying he's a pedalo, but theres unanswered questions!
Click to expand...
Well I’ve probably over exaggerated a little there ? I’m not sure how many people owned cameras in the 40’s! But certainly as long as I’ve been swimming. I think for competitions etc there would e permission but I remember being very little and my older sister tried to take some snaps (just of the water ) for an art project and she was promptly stopped, they did actually let her return after the pool had closed to the public but that was late ‘70’s early 80’s and one of my first memories, I can just always remember the signs. Nonetheless, I think that especially given his recent unaddressed behaviour and the fact that even in schools were now told we can’t photograph our own children he and her tea should have given it some thought. I’m guessing they do there best generally do keep folks out of the vlogs, recently anyway, either that or everywhere they go is deserted!
I think it’s really sad too that my children can’t have the same freedoms I enjoyed as a child, I guess as a parent you’re constantly assessing risk in all situations and given the allegations and moreso the fact that he didn’t deny sending them, suggesting that he thought it was an ok thing to do would make him a big risk factor to me.
Edit- someone on Twitter has found his previous mini rant when he couldn’t film the girls in their local pool and he actually says something like ‘due to child protection laws which are in my opinion too much in this country’ ?
 
Last edited:
Clarabelle76 said:
I’m pretty sure the T shirt is there to cover up his true ginger coloured hair, Lazy made a comment in one vlog that he covers up for decency! So it’s ok to film and broadcast to hundreds of thousands of people, unsuspecting individuals who’ve gone swimming Chris but you make sure nothing you don’t want to be exposed is all covered up?’ I still think it’s a weird kink to do with water, like the exact opposite to how he is in daily life, swimming in his clothes (he’d probably wear his greasy beanie if he got a chance) but in secret it’s skinny dipping and baths and towels, I’m sorry but go pro or no go pro if I saw him in 10 feet of a swimming pool I’d be marching myself and my kids straight in the other direction. As I said everyone that has ever used a UK public swimming pool in their lives will have seen the copious no filming or photography signs, for him to even question that they may or may not let him film in itself is all a load of bollocks!
Click to expand...
Definitely ginger hair cover up. I have never known a man to wear t shirt in pool...unless thrown in for a joke. Especially on holiday abroad most British let it all hang out!

Modesty my arse..excuses and lies!
 
Miss-jones said:
He’s a celeb though isn’t he! Remember this is someone who thinks he’s irresistible to teenage girls by using all his silly phrases and not forgetting he’s one of the main characters in the uks most soooper doooper vlogging family ?
Seriously though it wouldn’t surprise me if he genuinely did think it’d be okay to film. He probably is still deluded enough to think that companies want them to advertise them in their ‘wholesome family vlogs’
Click to expand...
I believe he does think if it wasn't for jealousy they would be winning with deals and sponsor ships...

Not that companies have common decency to think actually it's not a good idea to be associated with this joke of a family as they are far from wholesome with these allegations!
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top