I am Sarahjayjay #8 She has the self-awareness of leftover bolognese

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Witchfinder Sargeant

Witchfinder Sargeant

VIP Member
Thread title by @byefeliciax, nominated by @L3moning, congratulations, you both win a trolley full of beige food from the Aldi you're not banned from.

Sarah is trying to set herself up as some sort of budget influencer, by begging people to reply to her threads with budget tips and recipes. She gets about as much traction on these posts as she does on any of her others, namely, no traction at all.

She's also trying to pivot to chronic illness Twitter by posting her blood test results and asking if a doctor can give her advice. Wisely, not doctor seems to be prepared to risk their GMC licence and so she got no traction there either.

She stays up until 3AM, mindlessly scrolling through Insta and Twitter, and then complains she's so tired she must be anaemic. Not according to those blood tests, she's not.

She's now begging people to use her referral links for Shein and Temu so she can waste more money on shite that's been produced by slave labour. So very, very socialist of her.
 
Thanks Sarge. Is that a thread title hat trick for me? 🥳

Honestly really struggling to get my head around the mystery/lie: Do her kids have social media or not?

IMG_1754.jpeg
IMG_1751.jpeg
 
mchops said:
So he wants less butter, put less butter on. Why make a bleeping thing about it. You save money you daft bleep
Click to expand...
It’s probably not even butter, it’s probably margarine. I agree though, she’s being stupid. I bet she invalidates everything they feel tbh, if a kid doesn’t want chocolate or butter, they don’t want it. It’s a bit different to having a kid who needs say, an iron tablet because they’re anaemic. Some things can be choices.
 
I usually believe women who say they‘re DV victims but I don’t believe sarah.

I’ve just read through her ex’s Facebook page. They split up when the kids were very small. She was perfectly happy for him to see the children until he started a relationship with another woman and then she stopped contact and he had to take her to court to get to see them again. She broke the terms of the contact order at least once. He has two more kids and has been with their mum for over 10 years and seems like a devoted father with a responsible job supporting vulnerable people. Not the sort of job a violent man would be given or would want to do.
 
VeniVidiVicki said:
I usually believe women who say they‘re DV victims but I don’t believe sarah.

I’ve just read through her ex’s Facebook page. They split up when the kids were very small. She was perfectly happy for him to see the children until he started a relationship with another woman and then she stopped contact and he had to take her to court to get to see them again. She broke the terms of the contact order at least once. He has two more kids and has been with their mum for over 10 years and seems like a devoted father with a responsible job supporting vulnerable people. Not the sort of job a violent man would be given or would want to do.
Click to expand...

Was it him who did a flit to Spain? The one she was heartbroken over when the 'babies' were babies?
 
Foxvint said:
Our fake passports continue to languish in our hand luggage for when Sarah shops us all and pushes for custodial. I'm heading for Spain where a fledging ex-pat Sazza escapee community has already been established. Sadly no linguists have taken her up on the offer of working for free to unmask us scooby doo style so plenty of time to brush up on prison slang.
Click to expand...
Well, I thought my time was up when there was a rozzermobile circling round my area the other night but they either can’t find me, or don’t want me 😂
 
VeniVidiVicki said:
No I don’t think so. He went to Manchester for a bit but he‘s mainly stayed pretty close.
View attachment 2848426 q
View attachment 2848427 q
View attachment 2848420 q
View attachment 2848421 q
Click to expand...

Usually I would say that abusers can be very good at rewriting the story, they can also get good jobs and pose as good people but be totally different behind closed doors, so there’s a possibility he isn’t a good guy.

However, Sarah has consistently shown herself up to be abrasive, confrontational, manipulative, and a liar. It also seems the relationship was volatile from both sides (she said she threw a stair gate at him and used to slap him as well). I would not be surprised if she keeps those kids from him out of spite more than anything.

He seems very family oriented, it’s a shame the boys are missing out on a relationship with their extended family.

He could be paying for them though, or fighting harder through court. Words are cheap.

It won’t be long before those boys can decide for themselves whether to see their dad and she won’t have a say. Especially since she seems to give them unfettered freedom on the internet and never pays them enough attention to know who they’re talking to.
 
I wonder if it’s occurred to Sarah that she’s only got 4 years to get her tit together. She’s got 4 years to get her health on track, get on the road, establish a steady career, clear her debts, and have a stable earned income. That’s a relatively short amount of time at her pace. (How many months to defrost a freezer? To renew her broadband? How many years to get a cooker sorted? How long to build a piece of flat pack furniture? She booked a driving lesson yet? Applied for a job?).

In 4 years her twins will be turning 18 and she will lose a massive chunk of her benefits. In fact, in 2 years she could lose all the kid benefits if they don’t manage to stay in mainstream education. The child element of UC at its current rate for two kids is approx £585 per month. Child benefit per month for 2 is about £170 a month. That’s £755. Then take into account that her housing element entitlement will reduce too because she can only claim as one person for one room, so she’s looking at having to cover a shortfall of about £1,000+ a month with no cute babies to exploit for crowdfunding.

She thinks she’s in poverty now? Wait until her income drops to only 1 single person’s allowance of UC and ESA call her up to renew and do a health assessment and realise that her ankle is now healed and her other “health issues” don’t actually warrant not working. She’ll lose that too.

I had a single, no-dependents friend who was unemployed for a while. Their UC didn’t even cover their share of the rent and utilities in a shared house and it left them in minus figures for food, toiletries and other essentials!

What’s her plan then? Keep telling the kids they’re so sick and inept that they have to live with her forever and help her cover the bills out of their benefits and blag Carer’s Allowance for them? Does she not want her kids to have aspirations? Opportunities? Careers? Lives? Families of their own? Of course not! Because then she’ll have to pull her finger out and actually work herself.

In 4 years His Lordship will be 30. Does she really want him still chain smoking and gaming in his bedroom with an internet girlfriend who lives on the other side of the world, while her adult twin sons still share a bedroom and claim £300 a month benefits in their own right (that they’ll rinse on non-essentials and expect Mummy to still feed them because she never taught them money sense) because they flunked their educations and followed in her footsteps arse-prints on the sofa? What kind of life is that for anyone? I wouldn’t wish that on an enemy, let alone my own children.

Alternatively the kids might wise up to the psychological abuse and neglect from their narcissistic mother and contact their paternal families who seem to have a good work ethic and support system. If she’s not going to inspire and encourage any of them to do better than her, their dads might. But then it’s just Sarah, Twitter, a double bedroom tax, a broken oven, and a car she can’t drive, with about £500 all in in benefits entitlement to cover everything.

Either way you look at it, her imminent future looks pretty bleak if she doesn’t get it together. A change of government isn’t going to miraculously make her future more fruitful, that’s all on her, and she doesn’t have the time nor resources nor intellect or personality to establish herself as a Psychologist. She should probably just find a new (and realistic) dream.

Time is of the essence!

She knows nobody is coming to save her, that’s why she keeps asking people to save her.

IMG_1758.jpeg
 
Last edited:
She’s playing right up to the Tory stereotype of sickness benefit claimants.
IMG_4933.jpeg

But she’ll be ready when she gets her masters? If chronic illness is preventing you from working, how will achieving a qualification alter that?
She’s already told us. She’ll only work if she gets a career with a generous salary. Nothing to do with illness. “Living relatively comfortably on benefits because it’s more financially advantageous to me than working would be” wouldn’t be so good for the beg, would it?
IMG_4936.jpeg

That equation changes in a few years as @byefeliciax detailed above. Better crack on.
 
BeardyBap said:
She’s playing right up to the Tory stereotype of sickness benefit claimants.
View attachment 2849143 q
But she’ll be ready when she gets her masters? If chronic illness is preventing you from working, how will achieving a qualification alter that?
She’s already told us. She’ll only work if she gets a career with a generous salary. Nothing to do with illness. “Living relatively comfortably on benefits because it’s more financially advantageous to me than working would be” wouldn’t be so good for the beg, would it?
View attachment 2849191 q
That equation changes in a few years as @byefeliciax detailed above. Better crack on.
Click to expand...
And therein is what's wrong with the system. Everyone working- even on minimum wage- should be better off than everyone on benefits. That's a hill I'll die on.
 
She has absolutely no concept of how the working world actually works, does she? Uni doesn’t qualify anyone for any guaranteed career. Being a jobless bum all your life but then getting a masters in Psychology when you’re 50 odd doesn’t then give you free rein to get any old job in mental health with a salary that takes your fancy! You still start from the bottom and make your way up like everyone else had to.

You can have all of the education the world has to offer, but without any experience (and/or a decent personality) that’s null and void, and just some very expensive pieces of paper. Nobody is going to take her seriously. Can you imagine her finishing her Masters and trying to get a “good” job?

“I applied for a job but you didn’t get back to me. Name’s Socialist Sare.”

“Okay, well I took a look at your CV and I noticed that it’s, well, blank?”

“It’s not blank! I have degrees!”

“But there’s no work experience?”

“Yeah but I’ve been a single muvva to my babies for ages.”

“How old are your kids?”

“They’re in their 30s now.”

“Right. Well, it’s unclear what your work experience is. Can you tell me what your last job was?”

“Well I’ve never actually had a job, but I did grow up on the shop floor and watch my parents work so I know roughly what working looks like.”

“Do you realise that you’ve applied for the position of an Educational Psychologist?”

“Yeah.”

“Can you tell me what you think qualifies you for the role?”

“Well I’m very, very clever. I was in top set for everything in school. I did a beauty course and then an English degree and then a Psychology masters. I have prequalified Ed Psych experience because an old mate of mine worked with kids for a bit and I diagnosed my own son with Autism.”

“And that was formally acknowledged by a post-qualified professional?”

“No, they didn’t think he is ASD but I know he is ASD because he gets a gacky mouth if he eats two Easter eggs in a row.”

“Thank you, Miss Goodwin, I think we’ll leave it there. We have a cleaning job going that might be better suited to your experience level if you’re interested?”

“You’re a misogynist! You’re gaslighting me! Don’t you know I’m a DV victim! And I broke my ankle once! How can you expect someone with a Masters degree to CLEAN?! You bleeping Tory witch!”

If she was deadly serious about and capable of having a career in mental health, she could have done any number of things to achieve that. She could have worked in care. She could have trained as a mental health HCA. She could have volunteered for Samaritans, like her ex did.

Mind you, I’m glad for vulnerable people that she hasn’t done those things.
 
Last edited:
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top