Thanks for that. I can never bleeping un-see thatMore like "Megans Minge" if the blind has got the guru right.
YesHas anywhere other than the mail reported this?
Ma’am always wins! Love this turn of eventsI'm raging after a few minutes on Twitter, the Queen has been 'mean and petty' according to the idiots who will throw money at these 2.
Has anywhere other than the mail reported this?
I forgot about the instagram. Oh dear. What a disaster.(I typed that with a serious face, honestly).Harry and Meghan are not allowed to use the Sussex Royal brand
https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...-using-Sussex-Royal-brand-cost-thousands.html
serves them right for being so greedy.
So how does a Instagram work; can they change the name of their account but keep the followers?
i guess they’re trying to get this hammered out before H&M are due back for the commonwealth service.
I’d say the Queen has been pretty vindictive by sending them to Coventry, I mean Canada.Reading the Daily Mail article there was a section by Robert Hardman and he was saying that it’s not based on what the Queen wants but it’s the law of the land that some things relating to Royals can’t be marketed.
So people complaining that The Queen is being petty and vindictive, etc are 100% one. Do they really want to law to be changed so The Markles can hawk their new bed linen collaboration with Walmart or whatever it is?
Give over.
Also, Queenie can be way more vindictive than not allowing them to use Sussex Royal. And I dare say her vindictiveness would be a lot more creative.
It made my bleeping year this, she will be concocting ways to get back at EnglandI bet megatron is seething!
AhahaFrom Twitter
@stevenpbook
25m
Replying to
@LeCreusetFiend
The only way this could get better if she grants the “Sussex Royal” name to a new breed of cow, type of potato or similar