Harry & Meghan #54 H&M to fall off their perch. More money needed, what won't they 'merch

Will there be a trial?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Maybe

Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
mylifeisasillymoviefail said:
Also I know people say he accidentally said two weeks but equally he said two weeks. As in people say babies change so much in two weeks. Not that this baby has changed in 2 weeks just that babies do.
Click to expand...
That's our Hazznoballs, concise, lucid and statesmanlike. Yes, our Prince of the realm and 6th in line to the Throne stood in front of the world's press, holding an oversized plastic infant which he pretended was his son. He was accompanied by his wife whose midriff was blown up by a cushion and anchored by a strap under her armpits.
Clinging together and stroking and patting the silicone doll, they gushed about its "progress" from shipping carton to a lace shawl in Hazznoballs's arms. You couldn't make it up.
(It's my personal opinion that they committed a massive fraud here, but I know there are people who believe that was a real baby).
Did you notice one of the "micro-expressions" on her face when he waffled about "two weeks"? When he failed to hit the On button that should have made Darren twitch or pass wind for the paps, they left!
 
Baguette said:
Another cracker from Daniela Esler for News.com.au She's pointed out Harry bleating about social media is jumping on an existing bandwagon - he's not adding anything to the debate but just trying to gain some personal PR. And then rightly asks why they aren't supporting some less-fashionable but more genuinely deserving causes (hint - like Princess Diana actually did).

www.news.com.au

Harry and Meghan’s big mistake in first 300 days as non-royals

COMMENT
www.news.com.au www.news.com.au

Harry and Meghan are two of the most famous people in the world and there is no CEO, politician or celebrity who would not take their call or eagerly listen to them discuss whatever disease, social ill or needy organisation they had decided to throw their sway behind.
Click to expand...

I’ll call bullshit on this! :poop::poop:
 
Scotch Mist said:
I've just found this picture of Smeggy and Hazno apparently taken after the birth of Archie. I'd never seen it before. View attachment 403708 q
Meghan looks surprisingly chipper and unruffled for someone who has just finished labour and delivery, and is clearly wearing make-up !

Below is the text regarding surrogacy was sent out after the birth and then quickly withdrawn (for those who haven't seen it before).
View attachment 403720 q
Click to expand...
That photo doesnt look quite right. M and baby more in focus.
 
Poppea said:
This is big! She starts to turn on them. All her former articles were dripping adulation. Now: Not so much!

I love it! 😁
Click to expand...
It's not impressive that people now see through them (no shit Sherlock!) and jump on the bandwagon. I think a lot of these columnists and influencers follow the herd and would turn the other way in a millisecond. It's too late in the day for snide and wise-after-the-event articles like this trying to be clever, as any serious columnist should have been able to see what a pair of shysters they have been from day one.
Daniela Estler fawned over them like the rest of the press, but it's safe to show herself now and turn on them as the mood has shifted. Very few people dare to be a lone voice, not surprising witness Murky Meg.
 
I love this post from Deanne Eppers, more or less saying Wills would be able to deal better with the pair of what Freda says
www.quora.com

An Unpopular Position, But Here Goes… Watching Meghan and Harry manhandle the monarchy, where they are still allowed to run roughshod ov...

An Unpopular Position, But Here Goes… Watching Meghan and Harry manhandle the monarchy, where they are still allowed to run roughshod over the royals and the institution itself, makes me think something wildly unpopular. A young, clear-headed,strong royal who is of the same generation as Markle ...
www.quora.com www.quora.com
 
mylifeisasillymoviefail said:
"Royal travel: How Prince William & Harry have secretly boarded Ryanair & BA flights | Travel News | Travel | Express.co.uk" https://www.express.co.uk/travel/ar...illiam-harry-kate-british-airways-ryanair/amp
So noone knew they were there in their cheap flight seats that they had VIP treatment to get to.

Or no-one cared enough?
Click to expand...
OMG this is stunning news! Shocking! Hazznoballs folded over like a cheap camping stool with 18 inches of legroom on Ryanair! And by the toilets! And nobody knew! He is, verily, a Man of The People, One Of Us.
 
liar liar said:
I somehow feel that if Meagain hadn't ghosted him he would be their best friend. I don't like him at all.
Click to expand...
I quite like him. I'm not into sugar sweet blokes, "too sweet to be wholesome" as my mammy would say.
I doubt I could live with Piers 24/7, but for that occasional moment when you just want slammed against the headboard without too much preamble I wouldn't say no.
OK, too much information.:m
 
Scotch Mist said:
I've just found this picture of Smeggy and Hazno apparently taken after the birth of Archie. I'd never seen it before. View attachment 403708 q
Meghan looks surprisingly chipper and unruffled for someone who has just finished labour and delivery, and is clearly wearing make-up !

Below is the text regarding surrogacy was sent out after the birth and then quickly withdrawn (for those who haven't seen it before).
View attachment 403720 q
Click to expand...
Is this photo of the birth a joke???

freda19 said:
I quite like him. I'm not into sugar sweet blokes, "too sweet to be wholesome" as my mammy would say.
I doubt I could live with Piers 24/7, but for that occasional moment when you just want slammed against the headboard without too much preamble I wouldn't say no.
OK, too much information.:m
Click to expand...
Hussy...!
 
Just_me1954 said:
That photo doesnt look quite right. M and baby more in focus.
Click to expand...
I agree that there's something not right with that photo at all. I suspect its a fake.

Minky Billups said:
Talk Radio interview with rep from the Free Speech Union about Harry’s demands to cull free speech. She points out this is not just an inappropriate political stance from a Prince but also very elitist. 👏👏👏😠

Click to expand...

Excellent. This interview follows on from her article in Spiked
www.spiked-online.com

Harry and Meghan, patrons of online censorship

The woke royals are now campaigning for greater regulation of the internet.
www.spiked-online.com www.spiked-online.com
She makes some great points. Well worth a read.
'Supporting organisations that demand not only the censorship of people they disagree with but that also want to give unelected international bodies control over what can be said online would be quite a step, even for a prince.'
 
Scotch Mist said:
I've just found this picture of Smeggy and Hazno apparently taken after the birth of Archie. I'd never seen it before. View attachment 403708 q
Meghan looks surprisingly chipper and unruffled for someone who has just finished labour and delivery, and is clearly wearing make-up !

Below is the text regarding surrogacy was sent out after the birth and then quickly withdrawn (for those who haven't seen it before).
View attachment 403720 q
Click to expand...
That's not what the Portland Hospital looks like at all, there are no green tiles in there. I gave birth to one of my babies there in 2011 and as far as I know they have not changed the decor. Has anyone else had a more recent look in there and recognises these tiles?
 
cosmo girl said:
Click to expand...

Love the way that's worded. It just shows how wording and phrasing differs in reporting the same thing. I'd read that info already, reported from various sources after the hearing last week but this version really emphasises the lying and manipulation attempts from the montecito minger throughout this long running case. It's just a huge shell game to her and prince Dickwad. Shuffle the cups around and let the peasants try to guess which one the truth is hiding under. If they pick the wrong one that's ok, cos guess what? the truth is never under any of the cups in the Montecito version. It's hidden deep and would have to be pried from their fingers millimeter by millimeter by a modern day Tomás de Torquemada.

zRDGVW6.gif


I also liked that Anna Harnes stresses the total belief of Verity in his source and the fact that this is a high-end source rather than just info from a guy delivers fish to the royal kitchens once or twice a week.

LadyMuck said:
Surely that's not a genuine tweet from KP is it? Grammar is so poor !
Click to expand...
It's faked. Was on twitter ages ago.🤣
 
kev1974 said:
I'm not on Instagram. I get that they need to have a process to suspend an account. But it seems totally utterly wrong that someone else can then pick up the suspended user name and take it as their own? If its suspended it should be just that?
Click to expand...
Murky Meg had her account removed after it was reported as ‘spam‘. The new account is only days old and has lots of silly quotes, and cartoons about being ‘nice‘ and ‘kind‘ and a link for ‘stop hate for profit’ yet the account handle completely contradicts its self proclaimed intent. On that basis I have flagged it to IG. Frankly, it’s spam.

Palpatine said:
It’s shopped. You only have to look at the body ginge’s head is on. Much darker skin tone than the pale ginger twats face!

also the head is too small for the shoulders. Maybe it got shrunk by some witchdoctor ☠
Click to expand...
That photo is blatantly a fake. I would imagine the tweet is too.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top