Harry & Meghan #53 Ginge & Cringe have no shame, manipulating the public using Diana’s name

[ResidentMerkin]

It was an odd comment from Rob Lowe, wasn't it? What came over was that Harry is a laughing stock amongst the Hollywood set. Harry wearing a pony-tail? Is that a jab at his hairloss? Rob Lowe is A-list and immensely well-connected, and has owned a string of jaw-dropping houses in Montecito for years. So he will know all about exactly where the Harkles are actually based. I thought the line about 'I tailed him back to where he lives' was definitely hinting at the open secret that they ain't living at that Montecito property.

A Sunshine authorised comment would be 'oh yes, I've met them, they are just so humble and down to earth, blah blah, charidee, shine a light' Not 'Hazza is a friendless weirdo who drives around by himself wearing a glue on ponytail....'

(Small point. Harry is long past being able to drive a car on a tourist visa, so he'll need some sort of visa that allows him to drive legally in the US)

Spot on Baguette! Merci!!

She’s really quite the skank when you look closely, isn’t she? Imagine all the dirt and sweat trapped within those cracks?! A fouler stench I could not imagine.

I imagine she has huge blackheads in her ears, too. Those heavy wigs must make her sweat more than usual. All that excess perspiration pooling in her ears, mixed with bits of old make up, hairspray, sebum, and every day dirt represent the perfect breeding ground for great big whopping ear blackheads. Can anyone find any close ups of her lug holes so I can investigate my theory?

The ridiculous wigs she worn after Archie was born up until, well, nowish... they just looked so awful. Ranging from Cousin It in The Ring preposterously thick and long magic mane to the 1970s Cher 4ft long oil slick... it is no wonder she was sweating poostains in her pits in the 5c January evening drive-by visit to Canada House last year. She wasn't even wearing a coat, as she had a bearskin hat on her head!

I cannot imagine between that, the bronzer, the pancake foundation, the eyelash glue that she NEVER seems to get right. Ewwww

Google Image Result for https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEihACyUb51qMeuS3YStweEy0KswsyI8JtAhitk8YDO-ZNCpWrP_tfR5u22WGJJ_-TlAS3w65t3GP4NaPn4ByP0F9kR9AlCwt5rSvU4xYTzNQKtxBJzxTsoaDMnDnkNablIysDsOqXCiKc0r/s1600/Cousin+Itt+images.jpg

Diana was only 36 when she died. It shocks me everytime I remember that.

She would have been about the same age as Princess Caroline of Monaco, who is now 63 with three failed marriages behind her, and I think at best that was where Diana was heading.

They separated in 1992 and announced their divorce in August 1996. She died 12 months later. That still baffles me as it feels like there was much more time between her divorce and her death. She was defo still riding the crest of the post divorce "revenge PR" wave (and good on her).

They are super deep, VERY painful to remove, extremely old blackheads. Trust me, I am a certified beautician and have worked, amongst other high end brands, for Erno Laszlo. It was the first profession I learned, when I was 19, changed career path later on. Those deep craters have nothing to do with age, they are a surplus of fatty acids mixed with hyperkeratosis, which can be the result of the wrong skin care regimen and not taken care of in time. Crepe paper, sun damage, pan foundatio are on top are all true, too.

Zoom in, you'll see what I am talking about. They are very different from her moles and freckles. They are sitting IN the skin not on top of it.

View attachment 386797 q


Great summary of the Archie tragicomedy btw!!! You did us proud, sista!

Regarding Rob Lowe, I thought it sounded like he was ordered to say something by SunshineSucks and made a funny cryptic remark which is the 'said something as you wanted me to, but you can't make me lie' version. Thought it was their answer to the rumours they don't live in the house. But then again, I could be wrong. I don't know if he even is represented by them. Or he was just pointing out they are not living there in a very naughty way. Which would make my day, week and month!!!



I can! A comb-over!

Glad you liked it! What catharsis to write that. Phew! Was having a crap day and that made me feel tons better!
I see them now, yes. Dat's nasty. Imagine waking up to that.

Right where she has probably painted on the contouring blusher bronzer with a spatula for decades (at least 2).
Probably one of her proposed podcast episodes: how to contour your way to felling a Prince

Oh the combover. The ginge combover. We Merkins provided that comedy for the last 4 years. I'm not sure we can handle GingeCombover 2.0

 

[ResidentMerkin]

California exodus intensifies as retirees, teachers, musicians seek less-crowded pastures

What do an actress, musician, aerospace engineer and teacher have in common? They all left the Golden State amid the pandemic.

www.latimes.com

The Markle Effect?

Debilitating taxes that are about to get worse and a crumbling i frastructure/social fabric... homelessness is out of control acrss the state. Santa monica, venice beach etc. One giant toilet/used needle swamp. Cost of living is astronomical and the state has been teetering on the brink of bankruptcy for the last 10 yrs, despite being the home for hollywood and silicon valley and all their trillionaires. This is starting to piss people off. NYC is witnessing a similar mass exodus. Chicago too.

...And the rest, is unfortunately, history.http://www.quora.com/Why-did-Meghan-Markle-leave-Suits/answer/Desiree-Mackle

...And the rest, is unfortunately, history.http://www.quora.com/Why-did-Meghan-Markle-leave-Suits/answer/Desiree-Mackle

www.quora.com

To the point

Didn't know that about Made in Chelsea. Makes sense as she was photographed with Millie Mackintosh, I think, biking on the grounds of Sohohouse Cotswolds... is that right? Around 2016? Once. Only once. Clearly Millie wasn't impressed. Was she even invited to the wedding? Goes to show how deluded Meghan is that she thought she could swan in and get a gig as a geriatric 2 bit American actress on a show about young, rich, "non-actors" who were raised and /or living in Chelsea (ostensibly... many were living in Fulham at the time, allegedly but whatvs).
It isn't that she is stupd. It is just that she thinks she is smarter than evwryone, goes out to prove it maliciously, and (here is the most dangerous final ingredient) belives she is waaaaay smarter than she actually is. Ergo never sees her errors so never learns from them, blames everyone else, never listens to anyone and simply destroys anyone or anything that might threaten her state of denial.

 

[Notanotherjen]

To be honest I never had a lot of time for Diana, she was not cut out for the role and was too young plus she turned out to be more manipulative of the media than Meghan Markle; its a shame Charles could not have married his true love and left Diana to live the life of a typical Sloane Ranger for which she was more suited.

Same, they were just not suited for each other plus she expected some fairytale. Sad that her life ended so early and so tragic.

 

[Just_me1954]

View attachment 388413 q

 

[Mikesqueen]

She's fine as a cable show actress talking about her TV show wardrobe or other such banal topics, but she doesn't have the gravitas to be spouting opinions on politics, world events and real life problems.

If she hadn't met Harry she would just be another actress reaching the end of her career and fading away because she was never good enough to go on to do character parts as opposed to the 'pretty girl' parts. Showbusiness is full of women like Meghan who are cast for their looks and are then discarded as they approach 40 for a younger model.

She totally landed on her feet when she met wet lettuce Harry as she has always been ambitious! There are stories about how she had asked different people to get her hooked up with a British guy and all her Christmases came at once when she was able to get her claws into JCMH. She reached the pinnacle of her ambition to be somebody.

 

[Scotch Mist]

View attachment 388413 q

If this is true then what has happened to Archie?

Must admit it's odd that Smeggy hasn't given the world her words of wisdom as the world's greatest earth mother and daily accounts of what Archie eats, wears and poops. Not to mention stories of how he has an IQ like Einstein and can already play tennis like a pro...... etc etc

If they paid a surrogate to give birth for them it makes no sense for them not to have the child. This Archie stuff does my head in.

 

[cosmo girl]

Daily Mail had a story about Violet on there. How her family know Prince Charles and how she was the one that introduced Harry to Meghan. Her daughter is very close in age to Archie though. I don't believe the story about Archie. My daughter was a very sick baby. She would throw up all the time. I would've loved a double when I took her out to social events
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's alleged matchmaker Violet Von Westenholz gives birth to a daughter | Daily Mail Online

 

[bubbadabut]

I think the Archie/Lyra thing is a bit of a stretch. The 'Archie' we have seen, has a definite boyish face to me. I had 3 boys followed by a girl and when my daughter was the age Archie was in South Africa it was evident facially that she was a girl, and my boys looked like boys. I think it's something to do with the eye shape.

However, I do think the Archie we saw as a babe in arms at the Palace, and fluffy hat merch Archie in Canada, look very different from South Africa/Duck Rabbit/first Xmas card Archie.

 

[Baguette]

I think the Archie/Lyra thing is a bit of a stretch. The 'Archie' we have seen, has a definite boyish face to me. I had 3 boys followed by a girl and when my daughter was the age Archie was in South Africa it was evident facially that she was a girl, and my boys looked like boys. I think it's something to do with the eye shape.

However, I do think the Archie we saw as a babe in arms at the Palace, and fluffy hat merch Archie in Canada, look very different from South Africa/Duck Rabbit/first Xmas card Archie.

Duck Rabbit 'Archie' looked like a little boy to me, as well.

What has Harry come to that Rob Lowe is calling him a Loch Ness Monster on a big chat show like James Corden? It's so obvious that everyone who matters knows the Harkles are as fake as Harry's hairline.

When Sophie Winkleman and Lord Frederick Windsor lived in LA, they slotted into the social circuit, Freddie played on a celeb footie team and they came across as a sociable and popular pair. Freddie's cousin Harry? Loch Ness Monster.

No podcast news. No Netflix news. Harry's 'top secret' book deal has already leaked.... What is paying their bills?

 

[Allflightscancelled]

Duck Rabbit 'Archie' looked like a little boy to me, as well.

What has Harry come to that Rob Lowe is calling him a Loch Ness Monster on a big chat show like James Corden? It's so obvious that everyone who matters knows the Harkles are as fake as Harry's hairline.

When Sophie Winkleman and Lord Frederick Windsor lived in LA, they slotted into the social circuit, Freddie played on a celeb footie team and they came across as a sociable and popular pair. Freddie's cousin Harry? Loch Ness Monster.

No podcast news. No Netflix news. Harry's 'top secret' book deal has already leaked.... What is paying their bills?

I reckon they're just running up a massive credit line, like the Queen Mother did, never intending to pay it back because she knew the Queen would, to avoid a scandal. And that's what happened. Of course that was her mum, and the spending wasn't on the Harkles' obscene scale, and it remains to be seen if HMQ would do the same for an actress she's known for a nanosecond.

But I bet people are falling over themselves to extend credit believing the royals will stump up. And Charles is just numpty enough to do it. If I was him, I'd let it be know the Harkles are on their own financially, because at current spending rates Hazno and Smegs could bankrupt a small nation

 

[liar liar]

Debilitating taxes that are about to get worse and a crumbling i frastructure/social fabric... homelessness is out of control acrss the state. Santa monica, venice beach etc. One giant toilet/used needle swamp. Cost of living is astronomical and the state has been teetering on the brink of bankruptcy for the last 10 yrs, despite being the home for hollywood and silicon valley and all their trillionaires. This is starting to piss people off. NYC is witnessing a similar mass exodus. Chicago too.


Didn't know that about Made in Chelsea. Makes sense as she was photographed with Millie Mackintosh, I think, biking on the grounds of Sohohouse Cotswolds... is that right? Around 2016? Once. Only once. Clearly Millie wasn't impressed. Was she even invited to the wedding? Goes to show how deluded Meghan is that she thought she could swan in and get a gig as a geriatric 2 bit American actress on a show about young, rich, "non-actors" who were raised and /or living in Chelsea (ostensibly... many were living in Fulham at the time, allegedly but whatvs).
It isn't that she is stupd. It is just that she thinks she is smarter than evwryone, goes out to prove it maliciously, and (here is the most dangerous final ingredient) belives she is waaaaay smarter than she actually is. Ergo never sees her errors so never learns from them, blames everyone else, never listens to anyone and simply destroys anyone or anything that might threaten her state of denial.

She was always going to be too old for a MIC jaunt. Too old and no real money behind her or London 'friends'. Staff do not count as friends Meghan - make note next time you Tattle to Scabid Doo.

 

[Allflightscancelled]

She was always going to be too old for a MIC jaunt. Too old and no real money behind her or London 'friends'. Staff do not count as friends Meghan - make note next time you Tattle to Scabid Doo.

Also the clue's in the name. Made in Chelsea, not 'just turned up in Chelsea, scabbing for a role in something/anything'

ETA Wow I sound bitter and twisted. I swear I'm not, it's just this pair make me so cross, they're such a pair of knobs)

 

[ResidentMerkin]

Harry shares an awful lot with his mother: divorced parents and family trauma; emotional neediness (call it an excess of sensibility); no great academic abilities but an instinctive ability to relate to people.

I used to see Harry being able to talk easily to people but not in the past five years or so, and he seems to have lost it altogether now he's with Lady Harkleton. Was it all just RF PR?

They are talking here about the Harkles using the suggestion box on the Archewell website to get ideas for the podcast.

Meghan and Harry 'crowd-sourcing' podcast guests via Archwell form

MEGHAN MARKLE and Prince Harry's Spotify podcast may not be as celebrity-filled as the Holiday Special in the future after royal commentators discovered the story submission page on the Archewell website.

www.express.co.uk

Honestly, any business knows you don't put a spam-trap like that on a website - it's inviting all sorts of junk and rubbish to be posted. So as everyone knows that, are they trying to set up a trap? Is the real story going to be 'we asked for suggestions and got hate mail instead'?

It is the TikTok recipe: tikTok does absolutely nothing - siits back and relaxes while their users generate all the content. And then the Users benefit from the incidental marketing it offers https://brands.joinstatus.com/using-tiktok-for-your-brand
excpet for here - there is no user benefits: all benefits go to H&M as they make it clear that anything you submit then belongs to them and they can do with it as they want.
excuse me for a minute while I go beat my head against a wall as to the sheer mimicry and audacity of it. And Spotify/Netflix is PAYING them for this? for them harvesting not only our data but our ideas? Who will be stupid enough to handover their hard work and creative ideas FOR FREE? for zero recognition??

I reckon they're just running up a massive credit line, like the Queen Mother did, never intending to pay it back because she knew the Queen would, to avoid a scandal. And that's what happened. Of course that was her mum, and the spending wasn't on the Harkles' obscene scale, and it remains to be seen if HMQ would do the same for an actress she's known for a nanosecond.

But I bet people are falling over themselves to extend credit believing the royals will stump up. And Charles is just numpty enough to do it. If I was him, I'd let it be know the Harkles are on their own financially, because at current spending rates Hazno and Smegs could bankrupt a small nation

totally agree. I think their mortgage and all loans that are currently funding them are backed by Harry saying "you know I'm good for it" without anything verbal or in writing from gangan. Totally agree that there is money being spent - and this might also include Schillings and court fees and ANL's expenses as per the judgment from spring 2020. The problem is, how do they pay for daily things like food, electric bills, etc? Perhaps Megsy is covering it as loans to "harry" so that she too has an implicit IOU for the queen to settle.

Another good article in The Spectator this week. I've linked but you only get 2 free articles a month, so copied and pasted the article below:

The echoes of Diana in Prince Harry

Oscar Wilde’s Algernon observed: ‘All women become like their mothers. That is their tragedy. No man does, and that is his.’ No man? Not quite. Prince Harry is in so many ways turning into a version of his mother. The first sentence of the joint new year statement from the Duke and Duchess of Sussex

www.spectator.co.uk

The Echoes of Diana in Prince Harry = by Melanie McDonagh

Oscar Wilde’s Algernon observed: ‘All women become like their mothers. That is their tragedy. No man does, and that is his.’

No man? Not quite. Prince Harry is in so many ways turning into a version of his mother. The first sentence of the joint new year statement from the Duke and Duchess of Sussex on their Archewell Foundation website declares: ‘I am my mother’s son.’ For those of us who were around when Diana was on the scene, there’s a pang of recognition here. Prince Harry is indeed his mother’s son. He’s what might have happened to Diana if this essentially English girl had been transported to California, had learned to think and speak woke, and had the redemptive down-to-earth aspects of her character removed.

Harry is what happens when royalty is crossed with celebrity and ends up as a new kind of privilege, without duties but with lots of attitude. Did you make it through the Archewell Audio Holiday Special? It was beyond awful — emotional effusion as a substitute for politics — but it was interesting in that it showed how royalty, unanchored, can be captured, lobotomised, capitalised and monetised. It could, you think, have been Diana’s fate.

Consider too those alternative awards that Harry and Meghan launched last month as a kind of rival honours list to the Queen’s. The checklist of progressive causes, from environmental stewardship to mental health, shows what might have been if Diana had lived to institutionalise her own value system.

This year Diana would have turned 60. Undoubtedly she’d still be beautiful, undoubtedly we’d still be obsessed by her, undoubtedly she’d still be the most fabulously glamorous and devoted grandmother. She was frozen in time when she died at 36 (Harry’s age now), but her life already had some of the dangerous elements that are manifest in Harry’s fate.

Have a look at that riveting Netflix documentary, Diana: In Her Own Words — prefaced by the useful observation that it represents Diana at difficult points in her life and gives just one side of the story. What it shows is that her decision to leave the royal family was based on a sense that she could do her thing — relating to people and helping them — just as well outside the family as within it. But what was never really thought through was how to manage to play royal without being anchored in the royal family. She, like Harry, could not have become the phenomenon she was without that status. She wanted to keep that mystical element, the royal touch, without the constraints of royal life, without a relationship with the Queen. Well, that’s now her son’s — or his wife’s — project.

Harry shares an awful lot with his mother: divorced parents and family trauma; emotional neediness (call it an excess of sensibility); no great academic abilities but an instinctive ability to relate to people. Diana was good at talking human to everyone she met; Harry’s cheerful mateyness derives from his time in the army. They also have in common a weakness for the company of celebrities (though in the case of Prince Harry, that’s probably his wife’s predilection), and it’s interesting that the only useful contribution to the Archewell broadcast was from Sir Elton John, his mother’s on-off intimate, talking about being an alcoholic during lockdown. Diana and Harry both collaborated in ill-advised biographies from which they tried to distance themselves. But as a friend who knew Diana well observed, what really unites mother and son is their impulsiveness, the tendency to act first and think later. Diana acted impulsively in divorcing herself not just from Prince Charles but from the royal family; a year ago, Prince Harry did the same.

Of course, the similarities can be overplayed. Diana was, for all her rubbish academic qualifications (attributable to her flaky education), an intelligent woman with genuine cultural interests — ballet, for instance. She also was fabulously manipulative; once she got the hang of her relationship with the press, she displayed a native cunning which was really impressive. She was astonishingly emotionally intuitive, far more so than her son. She understood the relationship between Camilla and her husband almost from the start, and it seems to have contributed powerfully to her destructive self-harming ways. The one legacy of that which remains is the way Prince Harry omitted any reference to Prince Charles from his Archewell new year statement.

The sad reality is Harry and Diana shared attributes that could have been enormously valuable to the royal family. Diana acknowledged as much in a lunch she had in New York with Tina Brown for Vanity Fair not long before she died. ‘What a pair we could have been,’ she said of herself and her former husband. He could have done his thing; she could have done hers. Harry too could have been an asset rather than an embarrassment, had he not cut himself adrift from the family from which he derives his identity. Both are, then and now, a loss to British public life.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/writer/melanie-mcdonagh

his departure is NOT a loss to British life. That last sentence pissed me off. We have unveiled a thieving, spoiled, undeserving shithead.

There isn’t a lot coming from them since they have signed for big money deals Thought we would have been bombarded by podcasts by now

they're like the school bully -- they're waiting for us to do the work for them and for them to get an a+ from the teacher after attaching their name to it and handing it in. If they don't get an A+, they can just blame us. if they do get an A+, they will cash in that credit pronto and move on to their next "project"

 

[Allflightscancelled]

his departure is NOT a loss to British life. That last sentence pissed me off. We have unveiled a thieving, spoiled, undeserving shithead.

Totally this. And it's the theft bit that sticks in my craw. I already surmised he was a spoiled and undeserving shithead, but the thieving that seems to be taking place IS a bit of a surprise. And if he isn't palming other people's cash he needs to be a bit more transparent to prove it, otherwise who is going to be willing to 'donate' to their future 'philanthropic' activities?

 

[ResidentMerkin]

View attachment 388413 q

I"m not sure that can be true. Lyra was born 30 July 2019. the baby in South Africa was able to hold himself up somewhat which is a 4 month milestone and Lyra would have beeen no more than 3, maybe 3 months at most.

Duck Rabbit 'Archie' looked like a little boy to me, as well.

What has Harry come to that Rob Lowe is calling him a Loch Ness Monster on a big chat show like James Corden? It's so obvious that everyone who matters knows the Harkles are as fake as Harry's hairline.

When Sophie Winkleman and Lord Frederick Windsor lived in LA, they slotted into the social circuit, Freddie played on a celeb footie team and they came across as a sociable and popular pair. Freddie's cousin Harry? Loch Ness Monster.

No podcast news. No Netflix news. Harry's 'top secret' book deal has already leaked.... What is paying their bills?

well we were one flimsy layer of onesie cotton and soggy nappy away from having confirmation that it was a boy in that video, that's for sure! had it not been for the onesie snaps in the "middle", I have no doubt that that nappy would have sagged to his ankles in a NY minute.

 

[liar liar]

Daily Mail had a story about Violet on there. How her family know Prince Charles and how she was the one that introduced Harry to Meghan. Her daughter is very close in age to Archie though. I don't believe the story about Archie. My daughter was a very sick baby. She would throw up all the time. I would've loved a double when I took her out to social events
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's alleged matchmaker Violet Von Westenholz gives birth to a daughter | Daily Mail Online

Wow the way Smeghan is staring at Sadie's baby bump - bliddy weirdo...

 

[Socklicker]

If Pom could rustle up Meghan as Delboy and Harry as Rodney...??!

 

[Baguette]

Prince Rodney looks better than the real thing

(Snipped for focus)

totally agree. I think their mortgage and all loans that are currently funding them are backed by Harry saying "you know I'm good for it" without anything verbal or in writing from gangan. Totally agree that there is money being spent - and this might also include Schillings and court fees and ANL's expenses as per the judgment from spring 2020. The problem is, how do they pay for daily things like food, electric bills, etc? Perhaps Megsy is covering it as loans to "harry" so that she too has an implicit IOU for the queen to settle.

You've nailed it there - it's something like that, isn't it? Megzy is running up debt via 'loans' from someone in on the whole set up. When the inevitable divorce rolls around, she demands that the debts are cleared and is able to use all that spending as evidence of her lifestyle needs. RF/Bank of Charles clears the debts just to get rid of the turbulent Douchess

The way they are wallpapering the press with dozens of Reconciliation of the Brothers/Queens Birthday/Trooping/Harkles tour of London PR, makes me think they are desperately trying to sell the summer events to Netflix for a documentary. Otherwise why push these buttons so early?

 

[liar liar]

Prince Rodney looks better than the real thing



You've nailed it there - it's something like that, isn't it? Megzy is running up debt via 'loans' from someone in on the whole set up. When the inevitable divorce rolls around, she demands that the debts are cleared and is able to use all that spending as evidence of her lifestyle needs. RF/Bank of Charles clears the debts just to get rid of the turbulent Douchess

The way they are wallpapering the press with dozens of Reconciliation of the Brothers/Queens Birthday/Trooping/Harkles tour of London PR, makes me think they are desperately trying to sell the summer events to Netflix for a documentary. Otherwise why push these buttons so early?

I've said it before ... don't forget, when she was living in England with Harry their homes were simply rentals. A small cottage at KP then onto a re-furbed larger property but still rented and also no proof that they ever lived there. She may have a claim on JCMH's personal assets but not on the RF and not on Charles who simply paid for her 'working wardrobe'. No work, no clothing allowance. As to security; I don't believe we know the truth.

 

[Scotch Mist]

https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...Middleton-thoughtful-gifts-39th-birthday.html

More rubbish from the Harkles PR team
Iwonder if she sent some of that weird mushroom coffee