I'm not good with sums but they are obviously shelling out way more than their income. These quotes below the article are asking some pertinent questions:
'Just from where or whom is she getting the money to float this kind of operation? The pr alone is now costing £3,000,000 per annum.They not only are paying the pr firms but also are paying for inclusions in various magazines and newspapers, like the NYT stunt. Their bottom line is probably close to £6,000,000 per annum if not more. The mortgage and upkeep on the house alone is a huge drain. Add in their multitudinous numbers of lawyers in both sides of the Atlantic, financial advisors, tax advisors, personal and household staff, then their outgo exceeds their income by light years.
Who has the liquidity necessary to support such a venture? And how does this prodigious amount of investment benefit whoever or whatever in the long run?
IMHO, the key to all lies within Soho House. Markus, with his discretion and contacts, is the link to whoever or whatever is funding the california mountbatten-windsors. I don't believe that the mountbatten-windsors have a clue as to from where the money is actually coming. When their usefulness is over, the rivers of monies will dry up'