Harry & Meghan #51 The Fresh Prince of Hot Air: from Royal stock to laughing stock

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
whathastheworldcometo said:
It is Greek, therefore the spelling.
I forgot what it means though
Click to expand...

It's made up poncy drivel that doesn't mean anything.

But in Smegs' lonely world, it means this.

1609144568569.png
 
www.express.co.uk

Royal Family LIVE: Meghan and Harry fury over Megxit deal extension

MEGHAN MARKLE and Prince Harry have sparked outrage among social media users following reports they couple have requested an extension to their Megxit deal.
www.express.co.uk www.express.co.uk
So the latest Archewell cult news is that they will be doing live performances for their stans cult members. I wonder if Hazno is receiving acting lessons 🤔 he hasn't shown much talent in that direction yet.

Archewell is a clear indication that they are going to set themselves up as cult leaders. Members will have to pay for everything to advance (just like Scientology) 😃🤯
 
Scotch Mist said:
What are everyone's thoughts on Archie?
I'm very puzzled. I know we've been told that Meghan was holding out for a large payday from a media outlet to do feature perhaps a few million but obviously nobody has offered that kind of money for a photo and I very much doubt that will happen now.

The general public would be more invested in Archie if we had seen a few real pictures of him (like the Cambridge children) but the British public has no relationship or connection with Archie at all now and the latest offering has reduced him to a cartoon character.

It was suspected that they used a doll for the first appearance. Then we got a photo of his foot🦶 🙄 and we also know that they cheated and put out a generic photo that wasn't Archie on father's day. In fact we've only really seen his face on 3 occasions.

It's hard to believe that a grifter like Smeggy isn't merching the everything she can out of the child. I expected endless narratives from her over the joys of motherhood and tales of how brilliant her son is, along with endless cute pics of him in designer outfits all for sale on Meghan's Mirror.
This would've been easy for her to do rather than supposedly holding out for a huge sum that didn't materialise. They would have received more favourable publicity if they had taken Archie with them to select the Christmas tree.

I don't believe their claims of wanting privacy for Archie at all. The odd photo shoot or appearance wouldn't stop him from leading a normal life the rest of the time like the Cambridge children.

Loads of people online think he lives with the surrogate but this doesn't make sense to me. If they used a surrogate and paid then why wouldn't the child be living with them now?

So what is the truth about Archie?
Click to expand...
I'm convinced it has to do with the fact Archie has medical problems, bless him.

Whether that is just the cross eye (sorry, I don't know the correct term), or something more, but that's why I think he is never seen. Even the cartoon Christmas card, his face was looking down, away from the camera.

It's nothing to do with privacy in my opinion and I'm dubious about her waiting to merch him when he's a bit older.
 
Just_me1954 said:
Not fair if this is correct, we were looking forward to THE court case.

www.quora.com

http://www.quora.com/Why-has-Meghan-Markle-lodged-an-application-to-postpone-her-High-Court-privacy-trial-that-was-due-to-start-on-Januar...

http://www.quora.com/Why-has-Meghan-Markle-lodged-an-application-to-postpone-her-High-Court-privacy-trial-that-was-due-to-start-on-January-11/answer/Benjamin-Smallbrook
www.quora.com www.quora.com
.
.


The comments are gold on this tweet about harkles xmas card and archie/george

Click to expand...


I love this comment: “she‘s managed to plagiarise her own kid.” 😆
 
So, the "Holiday Special" podcast hasn't been gifted to the world yet then..............surely if they leave it much longer it will be a New Year broadcast!

Also, did they only send their special family Christmas card to one charity? No-one else has piped up and said they have received one have they?
 
Last edited:
Chilli pepper 19 said:
This is all typical Harkles bullshit. Based on their behaviour over the last few months, they've already been thrown out and so they're now desperately trying to sell the pity party that they've been abandoned by his family while she's struggling with a new pregnancy and dealing with the trauma of a previous miscarriage. Will buy them a few headlines and sympathy from the sugars but as a power couple they're finished. The fact their pr keeps pumping out what they're going to do rather than what they've done shows no one wants them.

That book crap is a typical threat to Brenda that she'll spill some secrets. Somehow I don't think Brenda actually even cares now
Click to expand...
I hope that HMQ reviews the extension request with her head as the monarch and with respect for the will of the people, not with her heart as a grandmother.
 
LadyMuck said:
I'm convinced it has to do with the fact Archie has medical problems, bless him.

Whether that is just the cross eye (sorry, I don't know the correct term), or something more, but that's why I think he is never seen. Even the cartoon Christmas card, his face was looking down, away from the camera.

It's nothing to do with privacy in my opinion and I'm dubious about her waiting to merch him when he's a bit older.
Click to expand...
I'm dubious as well about the merching as babies are the ultimate in terms of cuteness and pretty low expectations about "doing" anything except sit there or crawl. Sadly I think something is wrong with the child. How Hazno was squishing him flat against his chest in South Africa was not normal. How she had him barely clothed for his Duck reading and also barely dressed and flopping about, head squished against her chest, at the polo... weird, and in both instances she seemed annoyed by the child. But in the few photos where his eyes are open, there seems to be a squint/wandering eye. Perhaps he isn't photogenic but still, there are ways of merching via a baby from a distance, like hats, shoes, stroller, toys. I think she wants nothing to do with him, which is sad. He is just annuity for her. It creeps me out tbh, as i sense an element of neglect. Hazno has no idea what to do with him as he is, as usual, following Smeggy's lead.
 
Scotch Mist said:
www.express.co.uk

Royal Family LIVE: Meghan and Harry fury over Megxit deal extension

MEGHAN MARKLE and Prince Harry have sparked outrage among social media users following reports they couple have requested an extension to their Megxit deal.
www.express.co.uk www.express.co.uk
So the latest Archewell cult news is that they will be doing live performances for their stans cult members. I wonder if Hazno is receiving acting lessons 🤔 he hasn't shown much talent in that direction yet.

Archewell is a clear indication that they are going to set themselves up as cult leaders. Members will have to pay for everything to advance (just like Scientology) 😃🤯
Click to expand...
Bring on the designer yurts - yee haww 🤠
 
About Archie

The theories that the surrogate kept him trouble me for one reason. Do you really think that would be ‘allowed’ to happen? Particularly if the baby was genetically Meghan and Harry? Surely a huge amount of pressure both obvious and covert would have been used. And they would have pinned the whole transaction down legally before it took place.
Also surely, given how delicate this situation is, wouldn’t their choice if surrogate have been very careful? Either using a proven surrogate or someone who had complete loyalty?
I just can’t see a surrogate getting away with deciding to keep the baby, especially if it isn’t biologically hers.
I know what the law is, but the law is disregarded so often when it comes to the rich and powerful.

I suppose the whole thing could have been planned in advance of the birth and documents lodged to be revealed should anything happen to the surrogate.

I don’t know. I just can’t believe that this would have been tolerated.

Something I think more likely, is that there was something wrong with the baby. Something not obvious during scans or maybe developed during the early weeks. A mitochondrial disorder or neurological damage during the birth? Something like that. Which would account for them having the baby for a short time and then Archie disappearing. Maybe Meg, being a narcissist, wasn’t interested in looking after a very poorly baby. Looking after a baby with a life limiting prognosis must be soul destroying and would absolutely stop her bid for celebrity and status in Hollywood. So they hand Archie back to the surrogate. It would explain Harry’s fading and dead behind the eyes look.

Those photos that were taken of Meg and the doll in the babycarrier are odd too. It’s so obviously incorrectly fitted and looks uncomfortable. You’d be worried if your baby was being held so carelessly. Not grinning like a fool. I think it is a doll in that photo. But why aren’t they taking more care over appearances like that?
I don’t know. Nothing adds up.
 
Baguette said:
There were a series of real estate pictures of Montecito Manor on legion-media.ru back in the summer and I had a squint to see if there was a wendy house..

LGN49602943.jpg


Is that it on the left? Looks really tiny there..
Click to expand...
Yes, it’s next to the guest house. And rather more tasteful than those Beckham/Kardashian-West efforts. But then it wasn’t designed and commissioned by the Harkles.
C77CE55D-AC5C-4324-B0DD-DD0A353FC6B2.jpeg
 
Just_me1954 said:
Not fair if this is correct, we were looking forward to THE court case.

www.quora.com

http://www.quora.com/Why-has-Meghan-Markle-lodged-an-application-to-postpone-her-High-Court-privacy-trial-that-was-due-to-start-on-Januar...

http://www.quora.com/Why-has-Meghan-Markle-lodged-an-application-to-postpone-her-High-Court-privacy-trial-that-was-due-to-start-on-January-11/answer/Benjamin-Smallbrook
www.quora.com www.quora.com
.
.


The comments are gold on this tweet about harkles xmas card and archie/george

Click to expand...


"My guess, and it’s an informed guess, is that the Queen has told Meghan to drop the case. If it goes ahead it will damage the Royal Family. For Meghan to come out of this mess and not lose face, Associated Newspapers would have to come to an agreement with the Royal Family. This is going to happen. I am 100% certain. There will be no court case".


That paragraph there ... There is someone posting on the Artemis page who sometimes drops snippets of what turns out to be good, pertinent information.

It must be a month or more since a comment read that the Queen had asked Meghan to drop the case because it was reflecting poorly on the RF. My money is on the Queen paying all bills and her people working quietly in the background to make this whole thing go away.

If there is any truth in this, I understand why the Queen has stepped in but my word, I'm seriously miffed about it. I'm guessing she is covering the costs, too.

The worst of this is Meghan discovering she now has zero accountability. Dark days, indeed.

This is probably why relations between the two sides have thawed recently.
 
I can understand Megs clumsy attempts at holding the baby when he was first born if she's not really been around babies before but in the Duck Rabbit video (a year on) - she had no connection to him whatsoever.
It totally goes against the reports that she fired the night nannies because she wanted to do everything for the baby herself - if that was the case and she was up day and night, catering to his every need, she would know how to hold him at the very least and their bond would be incredible. As it was, he was more interested in whoever was behind the camera - Harry/ fake Harry?
I'd like to think that even if she hasn't much interest in him, hopefully Harry does.
 
www.quora.com

This is interesting! It is being rumoured that Catherine, the Duchess of Cambridge, upon seeing Harry and Meghan’s Christmas card, excla...

This is interesting! It is being rumoured that Catherine, the Duchess of Cambridge, upon seeing Harry and Meghan’s Christmas card, exclaimed, “Oh my God, they’ve used George’s head. What the hell!” If it turns out that she did say this, (and the rumours coming from the Palace are usually confir...
www.quora.com www.quora.com

This is interesting!

It is being rumoured that Catherine, the Duchess of Cambridge, upon seeing Harry and Meghan’s Christmas card, exclaimed, “Oh my God, they’ve used George’s head. What the hell!”
 
Silbee said:
"My guess, and it’s an informed guess, is that the Queen has told Meghan to drop the case. If it goes ahead it will damage the Royal Family. For Meghan to come out of this mess and not lose face, Associated Newspapers would have to come to an agreement with the Royal Family. This is going to happen. I am 100% certain. There will be no court case".


That paragraph there ... There is someone posting on the Artemis page who sometimes drops snippets of what turns out to be good, pertinent information.

It must be a month or more since a comment read that the Queen had asked Meghan to drop the case because it was reflecting poorly on the RF. My money is on the Queen paying all bills and her people working quietly in the background to make this whole thing go away.

If there is any truth in this, I understand why the Queen has stepped in but my word, I'm seriously miffed about it. I'm guessing she is covering the costs, too.

The worst of this is Meghan discovering she now has zero accountability. Dark days, indeed.

This is probably why relations between the two sides have thawed recently.
Click to expand...

Why would the RF get involved in this case? It's reflecting badly on Megzy but not the RF. If anything, the more she is shown up to be not exactly on nodding terms with the truth, the more the RF look sensible in keeping her away from official duties.

Most cases settle before trial and if she doesn't want to hand over phone evidence, she can withdraw at any point (and pay enormous costs for both sides). Isn't that the most likely outcome in January anyway after Warby rules a summary judgement isn't appropriate?

ETA. The well-informed Royal reporters have said for the past year there's zero support for this legal action from the RF...
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top