cosey_nunt
VIP Member
I despair too then
Maybe this is to make Cam more popular, say she's preventing the return of the Stoat? An interesting idea, but would collapse under scrutiny if anyone found the Sun double-page Exclusive about Cam's private meeting with William soon after his mother died. Plus the CH statement justifying it by saying it was "in the public interest" to reveal the meeting. It wasn't, and it backfired over 20 years later in Spare, much rubbished but true.It endears Camilla to me just as William shoving Harry into a dog bowl endears him to me.
I like them both more now.
I absolutely agree with Meghan's Mole.
He visited New York 2 months ago.This was months ago, no? Seems pointless.
He visited New York 2 months ago.
Deflection usuallyJust seems odd that things are getting drip fed to the media which are clearly not recent clips. I appreciate PR is planned in advance for things like Invictus, but why are they releasing it now?
Sorry, I know I'm trying to make sense of things they do/say which is a waste of time...
How long before Harry is reduced to fighting Jake Paul?
More lies? Or another case of recollections may vary?!
New story incoming from Cinny's fave, Neil Sean.
Apparently, Megzy is now saying all of the secrecy surrounding the birth of Archie was because she had studied QEII (RIP). And the Queen's pregnancy was also "kept secret " It was all a tribute to the late Queen and royal protocols ! Allegedly.
But Neil points out that
a) different era, women just didn't flaunt their pregnancies back then. 1940's vs 2018.
b) what was all of the belly clutching at every photo op all about?
c) if she studied the Queen so closely, how come learning the words to the national anthem was so difficult? Why did she write on bananas?!
Perhaps we could also add:
How come she announced that her babies were not going to be given titles? If she had studied Royal protocols so much, she would have known that they would get them as soon as Charles became King. Why did she never correct the narrative, but sat silently as Orca's shocked "Whaaaaaaaaaaaaat?" reaction to the implied "racism" led to a worldwide scandal that tainted QEII's reign, honour and legacy? Tainted the whole country, actually.
And how come if she was so big on 1940's and QEII's style, she didn't always ensure she wore her hair neatly, a hat and hosiery ? How come she went out with her knickers showing through her skirt, or her decolletage (bra) showing because her shirt was unbuttoned almost to her navel?
Trying to re-write history because you realised you messed up is the new norm it seems. How many brand re-launches is this now?! Will anyone really believe it was only a tribute to QEII?!!
I certainly don't believe her after that curtsey, mocking our wonderful monarch, and comparing our centuries of history and traditions to a bloody theme park.
Isn't this the event where Harald was video'd arguing with Markus Anderson, but they stopped when they saw they were being filmed? I remember the footage and don't know if it's true, but gossip at the time said that MA was blackmailing the Stoat and that's what they were arguing about. I think Snakebite was there too, maybe that's a bit of rattlesnake scales to the left in the photo?
Yes, isn't it wonderful when the worms turn? When people who the elite think they've got in their pocket bite back at the ballot box, where it counts?The Trump victory means The Race Hustle is over. Race Hustling got Markled. People of Colour and Hispanics voted for a racist old white man to rule over them. I even heard that Trump is considering reparations for white people who lost out on jobs and promotions because of diversity quotas. I shouldn't laugh, I think it's all pretty awful. But because of Race Hustlers like Shouty Shola and Orca, I just can't help myself. Someone check to see if they're okay.
Cock-up on my part as @giraffetower was referring to a second Neil video which I'd not seen. I thought I was going mad to have missed so much and wondered where in the video all the stuff was about The Queen, but I'd not seen it! I won't transcribe it as giraffe has already dealt with it well.You did a better job than me @giraffetower with this Neil Sean video. I saw it as a rehash of the questions we've been asking on here for years, helped by other bloggers.
He's asking questions that should have been asked 5 years ago, but if this a breakthrough that's good. Is Neil going where others fear to tread, though?
The Ho's an exhibitionist and if she could have shown us a real photo of her stomach I bet she would have, ditto standing outside the Lindo Wing.
They've come up with a different cover story for the secrecy, which you've dissected, and you shed an interesting new angle on it.
In today’s video Lady C says that Neil Sean said as much as it was legally possible to say about the surrogacy in his recent video. Very interesting. Are the Germans about to break the news soon after all?
You did a better job than me @giraffetower with this Neil Sean video. I saw it as a rehash of the questions we've been asking on here for years, helped by other bloggers.
He's asking questions that should have been asked 5 years ago, but if this a breakthrough that's good. Is Neil going where others fear to tread, though?
The Ho's an exhibitionist and if she could have shown us a real photo of her stomach I bet she would have, ditto standing outside the Lindo Wing.
They've come up with a different cover story for the secrecy, which you've dissected, and you shed an interesting new angle on it.
The Queen gave birth at home KC, PA, DoE at Buckingham Palace and Princess Anne at Clarence House. So it wasn't really "secret", just more private as there were no hospital steps shots. Also in the 1940s new mothers used to have more of a "confinement" and stayed in bed for a week or two after the birth.
But at least a notice was posted at BP signed by 2 doctors after the births
Did he actually say something for a change then?
Usually he's all "allegedly," "as ever," "shall we say" and no actual news included.
Somebody has made an excellent point this video is more of an ad campaign for Jelly rather than the Invictus Games.