Harry & Meghan #469 wave pool wanker

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Cinnamon.girl said:
This.
You've nailed what's been bothering me since February when he was "diagnosed". I was puzzled at his appearances often with white stuff on the lower half of his face, noticed by BookWorm and readers too. He didn't "step back from public facing duties" at all, and continued to meet and greet though if he had cancer his immunity would have been compromised?
He seems to have been given the all-clear more than I've had hot dinners.

If he has a type of cancer that's treatable and leaves him able to frisk around, travel huge distances, eat caviar and work like a demon all day as Chuck is clearly doing, why the doom and gloom and praise for his bravery, threats that he's at risk? We're invited daily to feel sorry for him, but I'm not sure whether he's going out in a burst of glory riddled with cancer or is a fraud using it for PR, sympathy and a cover for manoeuvres. Mostly lack of action and duty.

Nothing would surprise me, and that anything is possible is their fault not ours.

If he has bladder cancer for example and its treatment is benign as you say above, why are we told daily how bravely he's facing gruelling treatment? Putting his health at risk for his duty? Virtually dragging himself to France for D-Day, Camilla anxious by his side. He has to slow down, we can't hold him back etc etc. Tom P Bowels warning of huge risk, Chuck's too fragile to deal with the Stoat, 7 minutes only. Overkill and contradictions.

That.
Thank you @TheCuban, I feel a lot clearer now.
................
Welcome back @LadyMuck 🍾 🍸 🤗 !!
Click to expand...
is a fraud using it for PR, sympathy and a cover for manoeuvres.

This bit. This is why tLQ wouldn't retire - she knew.
 
Parkin’ cars at the Markle Carparkle 😆
IMG_8913.jpeg
 
Cinnamon.girl said:
Thanks @LadyMuck 🍾
TRG video on manipulated an photoshopped photos and videos of the Ho's childhood and adolescence, designed to tell a different story from the truth. TRG showed examples including the appearance of Snakebite, the Ho's height differences, the friend in the photo who appears to have no arms or trunk, photoshopped Ho feet.
Northwestern Uni was a fraud.
The Ho couldn't have done the photoshopping on her own, and has had the help of the Markles who provided the photos to manipulate. However it's not just them either as they had help too.
Noticeably most of the Markle interviews are with Australian media, and TRG says Australia is at the forefront of curtailing free speech backed by a three-letter organisation. It's a military-grade censorship operation and Australia is trying to push the censorship of free speech and get the US to fall into line.
I got a bit lost here 🤔
Click to expand...
Except Northwestern says she graduated from there?
 
SharkAttack said:
As cancers go, how scary is bladder cancer, generally speaking?
Click to expand...
Terrifying, to put it mildly. My brother had the BCG treatments which unfortunately did not get rid of the cancer, ended up having his bladder removed, this in turn has affected his kidneys (repeated infections). There was no radiotherapy or chemo given after the bladder removal. He has now been diagnosed with secondary bone cancer, attributed to the original bladder cancer cells.
 
SharkAttack said:
As cancers go, how scary is bladder cancer, generally speaking?
Click to expand...

Well all cases are different but I had a number of patients who had had bladder cancer for some years. They had regular cystoscopies and if any abnormalities were found they’d have several doses of intra-vesicular chemo. This was in the days before immunotherapy was available. Treatment will depend on many things depending on the stage of cancer. Surgery or radiotherapy may be used. Surgery can range from resection of the tumour to removal if the bladder. Like all cancers, how ‘scary’ it is is dependent on a number of factors.
 
Maggiemaynot said:
William gets DisneyPlus without breaking sweat or being an annoying twit at a premiere.

Ouch, that’s gonna sting … 🤣🤣

View attachment 3242400 q
Click to expand...


And I love how no one knew about it.

Not a hint, not a whisper, not a countdown anywhere.

No one leaked it because while the royal reporters are watering olive trees, Prince William is making real moves and actually working.
 
Elainne said:
Would it be so that no one presses him to stand up to his traitor of a son, or because he was unwilling to let Catherine take attention away from him in any arena at all, he must know how very popular the Waleses are and wasn't going to play second fiddle even though it's something Catherine certainly had no control over.
I wouldn't put anything past him after he tried to stage a coup while his parents were out of the country and has a chef to make his desserts in this economic climate, plus all the other things that he has lied about. Oh no deciding to announce he has cancer on the same day as Catherine is too convenient in my admittedly consciously biased opinion, I just don't like the man, I thought he was just a bumbling harmless fool until the Queen died but now after the reparations debacle I believe that he is dangerous.
Plus he doesn't look at all poorly yet mentions his cancer ten times a day, he can just stop treatment any time he fancies going on a ego boosting jolly and intends to revisit Samoa again, if he had cancer he wouldn't tempt fate with such pronouncements, it's all another gaslit pantomime, he's done it at least once before when playacting the Flatpacks birth and bogus christening and he is so convinced of the general populations gullibility when dazzled by royalty that he has a real taste for it now.
Click to expand...
That's a post and a half!
It's very difficult to criticise a man who is ill. His cancer diagnosis has certainly been used to excuse his failure to deal with the Sussexes, it promoted Cam in his stead, (his life's ambition) and drew commiserations from world leaders. He's been able to portray himself as a man who might have little time left, torn by his warring sons but being brave. HM travelled with bags of blood and doctors, but we weren't told about it. I've lost count of how many times I've read that Chuck's got his blood as hand-luggage as well as doctors on standby.

The consequences of not being clear about his cancer (which is his right) leaves everything open to interpretation - is he getting cutting-edge new treatments, invisible gentle treatments, coffee enemas? At the same time we're told he's suffering gruelling treatment, battling, but seems to be having a whale of a time and looking great. Which is it? His wife bursts into tears with the free pig when he mournfully says he doesn't know how much time he's got left. None of us do, Chuck, even babies.

I can't figure out how Catherine fits in other than she's unlikely to appear alongside Cam. Or how well Catherine is, but whatever's going on imo Chuck will be calling the shots and I don't think he's a doddery old goat allowed by William to indulge himself and see out his time in the sun.

I agree the timing within hours of Catherine's illness was weird as they were supposedly in hospital at the same time, and Chuck capitalised on her illness with press articles for his own PR and twisted the truth.

Cam has proved a perfect foil and partner for over 40 years, and imo they're a ruthless pair.

I was looking in the wrong place for parallels with my husband, because I was reading and believing the press reports of how Chuck was suffering and making no sense of them. I should have looked instead at how Chuck looked , because there lies the truth imo. There's a huge gap between how we're told he is and how he really is. I've been trying to reconcile the two since February and failed, but things are clearer to me now.
 
Last edited:
GirlWithThePearlEarhole said:
I can’t remember whether I posted this on MN or on here but as a former oncology nurse I suspect that, after talking with friends who worked with me, KC has bladder cancer. I think he looks too well and is able to do much more than I would expect, to be having intravenous chemotherapy. Bladder cancer is frequently treated with intra-vesicular chemo, that is chemo that is instilled directly into the bladder via a catheter, left in for a number of hours then drained out again. Therefore you don’t get the generalised effects that is usually the case with IV chemo. Of course I could be completely wrong but to me, bladder cancer is the one that jumps out at me. I very much doubt he has pancreatic cancer as that usually makes you unwell very rapidly and may have significant noticeable effects on appearance and ability to function.
Click to expand...
Yes agree with this. My father in law had bladder cancer and was treated this way. I sadly lost my mum to pancreatic cancer 10 years ago and before she was diagnosed the health decline was extremely rapid. Thanks to treatment, she had an extra 2 years albeit the last 9 months she was extremely ill and suffered a lot
 
ETA last post.
I can't remember exactly what the article said except it was about the Wales children, and Catherine and William wrote it when she was in hospital or just after she left.
A day or two later the same article appeared with a completely different slant, full of praise for Chuck and no mention of the Wales children at all. He got them to them re-write it.
Does anyone else remember this? I was livid and posted here about it at the time.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top