Harry & Meghan #467 Harry the People's (magazine) Prince.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Ambrosie said:
Can someone please tell me what ILBW means? I’ve forgotten but I bet it’s really obvious and I just can’t work it out. I checked the abbreviations in the Wiki and it wasn’t there that I could see.
Click to expand...

It is in the Wiki!!

Screenshot 2024-10-09 at 14.14.26.png
 
I am in the camp that the children do not exist or if they do they live with their surrogate mothers. However the lack of children is a big obstacle if they ever do divorce as how will they explain custody of two flatpacks.? So my guess is they will carry on married and unhappy like the Duke of Windsor and Wallis. It is what they deserve too.
 
Ubu1uk said:
I am in the camp that the children do not exist or if they do they live with their surrogate mothers. However the lack of children is a big obstacle if they ever do divorce as how will they explain custody of two flatpacks.? So my guess is they will carry on married and unhappy like the Duke of Windsor and Wallis. It is what they deserve too.
Click to expand...


They could get kidnapped and the stress and sense of betrayal broke them up 🤷 He couldn't protect his family - an excuse that works either way and has potential to reflect badly on the BRF/set the Gruesomes up with security and money for life.
 
CELESTE CROCKETT said:
She looks drowsy there and a half smile unlike her usual rictus grin
Not living HER BEST LIFE is she?
---


She did have to cancel gigs because of terror threats didn't she?
Click to expand...
Yes but she’s a billionaire she could afford her own security. Plus the police had already said no, as there was no definite credible threat to warrant it initially. It was our sleaze bag politicians (including Sadie Khan) who all funnily enough got given free tickets. It smacks of cronyism. I was more annoyed at the implications for the court case with the ginger whinge though. You just know he’ll jump on this.
 
WestSideIsDaBest said:
A friend had some interactions with her. My friend is stunning and has done a bit of tv and radio work my friend was dating an associate of lizzy and lizzy quickly latched on to said friend. It’s like she clings on to these beautiful young girls and she tries to fix them up with footballers/celebs and train them in being “IT” girls.
Click to expand...
She didn't do a very good job with Meg. Well, actually, Meg is an it girl, but not in the way she thinks....
 
Ubu1uk said:
I am in the camp that the children do not exist or if they do they live with their surrogate mothers. However the lack of children is a big obstacle if they ever do divorce as how will they explain custody of two flatpacks.? So my guess is they will carry on married and unhappy like the Duke of Windsor and Wallis. It is what they deserve too.
Click to expand...


She looked like she was carrying baby weight when they presented the baby to the cameras though.

There are so many question marks.
 
ChaoticArtist said:
They could get kidnapped and the stress and sense of betrayal broke them up 🤷 He couldn't protect his family - an excuse that works either way and has potential to reflect badly on the BRF/set the Gruesomes up with security and money for life.
Click to expand...

I was on this ‘kidnapped’ idea quite a few months ago, and they might have got away with a ‘cunning plan’ like this at that time, but now all the rumours going around that the kids don’t actually exist have virtually scuppered any such plans

They would be the prime suspects from the get go. No matter how many ‘one tear left eye’ she shed the police know how they lie through their teeth (terrifying car chase anybody?) and would be hard pushed to believe anything they told them. In fact they would probably think they had set it all up and paid somebody else to do the deed ….. if they believed the kids actually existed in the first place.

They are on the slippery slope to nowhere …… the future is not bright nor orange for them (maybe in her case depending on which Ronseal shade she uses).
 
Piglet&Pooh said:
Is the security for TS linked to the terrorist threats that led to the cancellation of her Vienna concerts?
Click to expand...

Looks like it might have been. They wouldn't have wanted the possibility of another Manchester.

If there was any sort of "quid pro quo" in the form of freebies, that would be the problem. Not the security escort itself which could be justified under "public safety". I've seen football team coaches arrive at away games with a police escort for that reason.

metro.co.uk

New security measures for Taylor Swift’s Wembley Stadium shows revealed

Fans have expressed safety fears after a foiled terror attack in Vienna.
metro.co.uk metro.co.uk

I suppose Haz could always offer up a few jars of jam. :p
 
Last edited:
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top