Harry & Meghan #457 Dandelion Whine

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
I had a ‘friend’ like this once and over time a very small incident would become huge and completely different because with each retelling it changed and more and more in their favour. It was awful.

My mother broke her left arm about 30 years ago. Admittedly, it was a bad break that needed a metal plate but it healed and she's right handed so the slight restriction to her arm movement really didn't make any difference.

I don't sound very sympathetic because for years she would have a lecture that started "When I broke my arm..."

Amongst many others, the two worst were:

"Your uncle has a brain tumour. It's inoperable but when I broke my arm..."

and

"Your dad has Parkinson's but when I broke my arm..."

(When I post bits about my narc mother I'm aware of how melodramatic and over the top they seem but every word is true and, for those of you who live narc free lives, they show how low a narc is willing to go )
 
I remember when Archewell first started and they wanted people to send them "Compassion" stories that they could use for their Netflix/podcasts - down in the small print were terms and conditions that meant you were signing over all rights to Archewell to make money of it to you story by e.mailing it in. In 2021 it didn't really get the attention it should have done although the Sun ran an article.


"The T&Cs state: “By submitting material, you are granting Archewell (Archewell, LLC, Archewell Foundation, Archewell Productions & Archewell Audio, collectively Archewell), its principals, related entities, successors and assigns (Archewell Parties), an irrevocable, royalty free, fully paid up, in perpetuity, worldwide.
This includes royalties from their Netflix and Spotify channels.
The T&Cs continue: "If any Archewell Party elects to use the submission for any purpose, all rights under copyright or other intellectual property rights… relating to your Submissions shall be the sole property of Archewell.
You shall not be entitled to any credit, consideration, notice or payments of any kind."



It is disgusting that they are exploiting worried and bereaved parents for a datamining exercise
That’s genuinely awful. I was going to say something about how they get away with this endless nonsense but then I guess they really don’t. Everything they do flops. They don’t stick to one thing…they bounce from one headline grabbing event to another. How theyndont get called out on monetising other peoples grief does baffle me. They would sell anyone down the river for a dime.
 
I know it’s the wrong thread, but Starmer didn’t speak to people, so if felt more like a photo op. He should have spoken to people and taken the opportunity to listen to people’s concerns and outrage. He marginalised them instead because he doesn’t want to hear, because there is no appetite to fix things.

I guess the Royals are deemed as more neutral, but I think there’s understandably a lot of anger up there about all this that i’m not sure even they would have got the warmest welcome.
You are spot on - particularly about Starmer - but I do think that even though people might not have given the warmest of welcomes to say the Duchess of Edinburgh - they would have respected her, and they would also have thought that her distress about the attack was sincere.

Starmer has nothing to commend him. I know he's reaping the harvest up 40 years of rubbish governments, but he is continuing to divide people and communities - doesn't even try to bring them together.
---
That’s genuinely awful. I was going to say something about how they get away with this endless nonsense but then I guess they really don’t. Everything they do flops. They don’t stick to one thing…they bounce from one headline grabbing event to another. How theyndont get called out on monetising other peoples grief does baffle me. They would sell anyone down the river for a dime.
The dreadful thing is that they soil everything they touch and damage other people's lives too - look at the mess they've made Invictus because they used it to promote theimselves and feather their own nest. Who is suffering for that? The ex-service personnel who worked so hard to participate, and the families who made sacrifices to support them.

I wish they''d stop fecking things up for other people.
 
When she talks about it there is no show of emotion on his part …. No hand on her knee or a gentle squeeze of her hand to show he cared …. Nothing.


I haven't watched the interview but have seen the clip - this to me is very telling on their relationship and his 'believing' her about the suicide risk.

I would defy anyone not to respond to their partner if they start talking about wanting to end their life, even if it was just his hand over hers when she put it on his knee - there was nothing from him, no sympathetic look, encouraging smile, squeeze of the hand, or other physical gesture- just blankness.

No one normal could not and would not respond even in the smallest way of acknowledgement to the thought of , or harrowing story of how someone they are meant to love being so low that they are contemplating ending their life, but he just sits there.

Gone are the days of grasping hands and not being able to be separated.
 
I haven't watched the interview because I can't stand her voice.

But did she really say this?

1722854405680.png


She blamed her suicidal thoughts on the avocado and tummy stories?
 
off topic but, are the riots happening in the areas who voted in the majority for Brexit? Is this demonstrating/rioting being carried out by the 17 million Brexit voters who feel they didnt get what they voted for?
Honest answer...
(Cos I'm less likely to get banned here - but hey if I get banned at least I might write great novel before the cancer gets me)

The "incidents" (I'll call them that because having lived through the aftermath of the Bradford riots, and talked to the OH, who experienced the actual rioting) aren't riots - so much as staged provocations - that Starmer has either fallen for, or taken advantage of...

And I know there is an argument that you cannot blame the Labour government because 14 years of etc... and they have only been in power for a month - but this government have announced they intend an amnesty for migrants, a new race relations bill and outlawing Islamophobia (whatever that means)

At which point you can ask (assuming questions are still allowed) if Harehills, Manchester Airport and Southport were the spark.
Or if this was always something that was waiting to happen - given that Labour is a party of student politics, and parliament no longer has any real function in politics beyond deciding how many middle class tzars are required control the lower classes - and keep them in their place.

As to the Brexit point...
Instead of listening to the talking heads, get yourself a map of the look at the Red Wall.
Now cast aside all political allegiance and what you will see is is the towns surrounding the newly formed mayoralties (which vote Labour) voted Conservative.
Quite why no one in the Conservatives noticed this - I can only guess is because the north is up there, and we've run out of ideas.

No doubt pundits will come up with endless theories as to why this happened.

But since I have already outed myself as having a connection to Bradford, I shall mention the Bradford plan (and don't worry it doesn't officially exist, I only found out about it because of a disgruntled trade union official) - basically the plan is this - all services (libraries, registrars, poll tax payments, etc) were all cntralised in order that people in the surrounding towns would go to Bradford and take advantage of Blairs regeneration project that had built a new shopping centre.

And I don't doubt this all seemed like a brilliant idea to whoever dreamed it up - but for the most part you are dealing with areas of the country still dealing with the 1974 local government reorganization - I well recall friends in Middlesbrough who absolutely refused to accept they were in Cleveland and not part of Yorkshire.

So not only have you got towns separated from their proper county, with Super Mayors stripping them of services services, and status - But, it is not uncommon to find them not only been stripped of services, but they are paying vastly more to Mayorality than they are receiving.

I'm not slagging off Bradford (as in truth I rather like the place) rather using it as an example.
And assuming the failings there, apply more widely across the Red Wall, with regard to the failure of the Super Mayors.

Btw, the only way religion comes into this (beyond the extremeists funded by government money) is that sometimes the Muslims go nuts... at which point Labour will go all out for the Muslim clan vote (Which doesn't exist - but everyone knows it does) and completly ignores the votes of everyone else -in case you are wondering.... look at every election George Galloway has ever won.
Or in the last election, when 'islamicist' candidates won in Blackburn, Dewsbury etc....

It isn't any surprise, to me (and I am no doubt risking arrest, as seemingly Starmer is going to arrest everyone) to see the list of towns that reacted to the siren call...

They are pretty much places that have in one way or another attempted to escape the firm hand of Labour only to be recaptured by the principled middle classes (who wouldn't vote for anyone but Labour, becauseit is their duty to oppress save the poor) mainly because by now, anyone with any common sense knows that change is impossible - at least with Labour there will always be food banks, for those undignified to use them.

Oh, and btw...

I had a chat with the OH tonight.
And we both agreed that given the chance, the kids should get the hell out of this county.
They can write to us if they want, to let us know how they getting on,,, but it's fine if they don't.

Which is a converstaion I never thought I'd have.
And this is from someone who considers it a blessing that my daighter was stillborn at the height of Labour's last suprression of free speech during the grooming scandal.
 
The woman who said she was suicidal who went to Palace HR and didn't describe getting anymore help once she got fobbed off by them and the man who, while in institutional mode, told his suicidal wife to get ready for a night out instead of ringing the therapist he has on speed dial are the ones preaching the importance of being first responders?


was there not a rumour that smeg pulled this stunt in order to get a long spa break at one of those really really expensive places that i think one of her mates owned or something but all she was offered was a therapist which is why she ' opened up about it '
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top