Harry & Meghan #457 Dandelion Whine

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
It's an odd bandwagon to jump on. Their kids are 3 and 5 allegedly. So, hardly likely to be getting cyberbullied on their tik tok or insta Sm. They are 3 & 5. Unplug the bleeping wifi and tell them the paw patrol puppies have gone to bed and job done surely??

I have zero experience of the day to day travails that happen a teen, because my son isn't at that point in his life yet. I could probably give classes on what having a newborn is like, or a kid or a preteen... but teens? No idea yet. So how could I pontificate to other parents on it??

As well as that, they aren't teens who grew up with online bullying aimed at them. If anything, they've shown themselves to be horrible to others and only have unsubstantiated claims that they were bullied themselves.

They need to keep going with this type of tit, because this is how they show who they really are.
 
SunsetBeach said:
Def think the ‘barely scratched the surface’ is a threat to RF that there are going to be more accusations. At some point everyone is going to realise how she spent virtually no time as a working royal and has been living off it for years.

The cos playing Kate is so weird-trying to subliminally get ‘cancer victim’ sympathy. It is so creepy.
Click to expand...

The witch plans on more public scratching; wasn't once enough?
 
Meghan on CBS seemed uncomfortable discussing the insufferable pain of parental loss.

I wonder if it’s because they’ve subjected her father, her siblings and his entire family to complete alienation and constant media abuse. I certainly wonder how they reconcile their prolonged taunting and cruel vilification with the saviour role they now seem intent on promoting.
The unawareness, the cheek and bare-faced hypocrisy of them is beyond understanding. I’m buggered if I know how the rest of the world can’t see this.
 
Kotare said:
Meghan on CBS seemed uncomfortable discussing the insufferable pain of parental loss.

I wonder if it’s because they’ve subjected her father, her siblings and his entire family to complete alienation and constant media abuse. I certainly wonder how they reconcile their prolonged taunting and cruel vilification with the saviour role they now seem intent on promoting.
The unawareness, the cheek and bare-faced hypocrisy of them is beyond understanding. I’m buggered if I know how the rest of the world can’t see this.
Click to expand...
Her family are far better off without the bleep.
 
PurvyPanda said:
Wow - like I always say, her name is toxic. She brings out the worst in anyone who pays her attention. Myself included. I never normally use the word ‘bleep’ but find myself using it frequently on this thread.
Click to expand...
Interesting isn't it!
This word is definitely the very best fit for certain individuals.
We could use the Spanish equivalent, conõ as highlighted on the last thread.

It was one of the first words I learnt when I went to live in Spain.... Spanish men's pronunciation adds so much - think of the welly Billy Connolly thrusts into his cussing :ROFLMAO::LOL:
 
Shade. And you? said:
A really good point on Real Housewives - the whole interview on CBS had no follow up. No go here for resources or this is the next step. It was literally a word salad, but make it pointless.



:mad:
Click to expand...

Why would it. They never follow up or build anything. Also I wonder how Netflix are feeling. Yet more content for other channels but them.

They're trying to steal the PoW early years work as their own while she's recovering from treatment. And dropped this at a time they know all the royals are in Balmoral. Unfortunately it's 3 years too late as no one believes or likes her now.
 
wibble said:
Just saying.

Starmer should never have gone to Southport.
None of the what has subsequently happened, would have occurred had a member of the Royal been sent to lay flowers on the the nation' behalf.
Click to expand...
I know it’s the wrong thread, but Starmer didn’t speak to people, so if felt more like a photo op. He should have spoken to people and taken the opportunity to listen to people’s concerns and outrage. He marginalised them instead because he doesn’t want to hear, because there is no appetite to fix things.

I guess the Royals are deemed as more neutral, but I think there’s understandably a lot of anger up there about all this that i’m not sure even they would have got the warmest welcome.
 
PurvyPanda said:
I know it’s the wrong thread, but Starmer didn’t speak to people, so if felt more like a photo op. He should have spoken to people and taken the opportunity to listen to people’s concerns and outrage. He marginalised them instead because he doesn’t want to hear, because there is no appetite to fix things.

I guess the Royals are deemed as more neutral, but I think there’s understandably a lot of anger up there about all this that i’m not sure even they would have got the warmest welcome.
Click to expand...
Indeed, but that is precisely the point of the Royal Family.

In exactly the same way as the Emperor of Japan would "invite" all the rival warlords to spend the summer (the campaigning season) at the palace (and if they didn't turn up he would make war on them)
To prevent the kind of civil strife we currently see.
 
wibble said:
Indeed, but that is precisely the point of the Royal Family.

In exactly the same way as the Emperor of Japan would "invite" all the rival warlords to spend the summer (the campaigning season) at the palace (and if they didn't turn up he would make war on them)
To prevent the kind of civil strife we currently see.
Click to expand...
Yes. I do think this is as a result of years of not listening to people, and brushing them aside and trivialising their worries as branding them gammons and bigots. Civil unrest is the last stop saloon.
 
PurvyPanda said:
Yes. I do think this is as a result of years of not listening to people, and brushing them aside and trivialising their worries as branding them gammons and bigots. Civil unrest is the last stop saloon.
Click to expand...
I agree. The riots are terrible but if politicians keep not listening to people's concerns they will carry on. At this rate we'll end up with regular riots like in France.
 
Hannahebee said:
For those wondering Sophie is the patron of NSPCC who have made not said anything in regards to teaming up with Archewell and The Parents Network.
View attachment 3091952 q
Click to expand...

they are going after Sophie now but I think they are in for a massive shock because Sophie & Edward are very much loved by all the family and the Country because like Princess Anne They work damn hard & have raised two sensible kids .

I do think Sophie might of have had a few quiet words to smeg about Her behaviour in the past because Sophie was very close to the Queen and would not of stood for any of smegs bullshit behaviour .

Re smegs recent interveiw I am absolutly pissed that she has brought up those false suicide claims again She is just bleeping evil
 
Scotch Mist said:
I agree. The riots are terrible but if politicians keep not listening to people's concerns they will carry on. At this rate we'll end up with regular riots like in France.
Click to expand...

I sound so bad here, but why are people rioting? I know I sound ignorant, but I barely follow the news 😔

Harry's disdain of Meghan, he must be so embarrassed, bet he can't wait for the day they announce the divorce!
 
PurvyPanda said:
Yes. I do think this is as a result of years of not listening to people, and brushing them aside and trivialising their worries as branding them gammons and bigots. Civil unrest is the last stop saloon.
Click to expand...
If Charles or William had laid the flowers, perhaps talked to the parents, or the well wishers...
It needn't have been them (Anne would have been the nest choice, if Charles or William weren't available)...
But either way it would have taken the sting out of the situation...

Instead we got Starmer (the least voted for Prime Minister in living history) and Mrs Balls marching in front of a parade photographers with all the sincerity of Fingers in an un-ironed donkey jacket and matching ra-ra skirt....

I am sure Starmer (like fingers) thought he got the pictures he wanted....
But less than a week later, he's threatening (like fingers) to arrest half the country.

I go back to this...

1722838855242.jpeg


Blair for all his evil faults was far more popular that Starmer - so he did at least have some room to humiliate the Queen.

Not that anyone can stop Starmer doing what he wants... and if burns the country down, so be it....
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top