Harry & Meghan #446 Where Are Archigon and Invisibly

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
No need for such an aggressive attack. A simple polite 'Thank you for reviewing my book. Excuse me but X is right because of ABC evidence' would suffice.

I think I may have innocently stepped on her toes once. I can't really remember now- something to do with the Campbell family which I do know about! My post and the friendly little back and forth I was having with another poster disappeared within 2 mins!
I don't understand Lady C's popularity, myself. But many people, including many YouTubers seem to have a very high regard for her.

Avid Gardener even had a smart dress and pearls on and was visibly starstruck when she interviewed her (ie promoted Lady C's book). I didn't watch the interview because Lady C's voice is too much for me. From the little I've seen, her writing appears to be quite good and engaging, but I can't bear to listen to her. My opinion of her character plummeted when I heard about the way she had attacked Cheere Denise, It's only a little YouTube channel - as you say, she could have offered a correction and then ignored the whole thing, especially as I think Lady C, like Tom Bower, is very careful about only publishing stuff she can verify and offer proof for.

There was no need to be nasty about it.
 
Personally I’m a bit gutted they won’t be at the wedding of the year, I’d have loved to have seen what she turned up wearing! I can’t believe he’s still banging on about his security in the UK being an issue


They say they arent attending the wedding because they dont want to cause drama and then have loads of stuff put out in the media causing drama about the wedding.


Their hypocrisy ever more evident.
 
I have just been watching Cherre Denise for over three hours, I only went to take a quick look after I read your post, she is good at showing how very desperate H seemed to be to find love as the lies and manipulation coming from M were obvious. I find her really interesting.
The attack upon Cheery Denise by lady C was completely uncalled for, she probably thinks no one will see her over reaction because of it being a small channel, she comes across as a bigoted snooty witch constantly saying she knows best because she is older. This has really shown me what a nasty person lady c is. I shouldn't be surprised because apparently lady c is also a narcissist too. How many percent of the population are narcissist I begin to wonder.
snooty witch . . . also a narcissist

Just about sums it up IMO. And she's always promising to give a Big Revelation and never does. She's not stupid though, and wouldn't leave herself open to a libel case, so I think that she will have written the truth.

She acted like a nasty bully the way she pounced on a small YouTube channel. Until then, other than not liking her voice I hadn't had an opinion either way about her as a person. I have one now, and I don't like her. It was cruel and unnecessary.

Edit - missed a bit.
 
Found madams new shoes for the next car park walk…yours for only$$$$ the most sought after accessory this year
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6075.jpeg
    IMG_6075.jpeg
    82 KB · Views: 11
I don't believe a birthday party for Lili took place at the weekend nor do I believe that Lili was ever christened at the Montecito mansion last year because let's face it if these 2 things had happened we would have got pictures of the events.


Meh....the Nakedness of Sussex - despite her legion of faults - is definitely a patient planner. Not for important things like their Foundation or ARO, mind. She's proven herself tit at that. But whether it's for puff piece PR campaigns, car park "pap" stunts or petty revenge against people for perceived slights ..she's got it covered....and then some. She might even use a podcast to get revenge /even some 10 years later, that's how good she is at patiently planning.

She will have some footage of the birthday party somewhere - even if it gets "filmed" just before christmas 2024. Remotely. On a lap top. Or maybe she already has a stash of pictures taken 2 years ago last Tuesday? People might notice her face looks different, or that it's the exact same outfit she wore to a highly publicized event 6 months ago. They will scrutinize the photo's and notice that despite her attention to detail and everyone vehemently denying any photoshopping, Lilibucks' head has somehow merged into a doorframe, and she is wearing clothes that only came out in a year from now. And Meghan is still wearing the blood diamonds, but not her wedding ring. Or something.

But Meghan won't care - there'll be a cake moment and a Misan "100% not photo-shopped, but lots of photography experts say it absolutely is"TM picture somewhere. Beng stored. For future use. To be given to the world on a specific and patiently planned date... like Catherine's birthday. Or maybe her Christmas concert. Probably.

Problem is. By the time she releases it, will anyone give a shiny tit?

Allegedly. Maybe. Other truths may vary.

🤣
 
I went down a rabbit hole on X regarding the alleged first husband Joe Guiliano. Apparently this is him and his daughter. Has this photo been seen before? I don’t know if it’s real but the kid, from what can be seen, sure looks like Smeg

more in depth info

Very interesting read. I had heard the rumour of the first, annulled, marriage and a baby before, but you can never tell what is true and what is fabrication.
 
Which way was the wind blowing for this party?

It would be terrible if their lovely garden stank of cannabis from the cannabis farm.
Harry may have been forced to get the scrubber out.
too late....... shes been out and about for aaaaaggggeeeees.... soho house, london, Nigeria , South Africa etc etc etc - dont call her Karcher for nothing - as weird as it sounds she both Sucks and Blows.... a bit like my vacuum :)
 
I went down a rabbit hole on X regarding the alleged first husband Joe Guiliano. Apparently this is him and his daughter. Has this photo been seen before? I don’t know if it’s real but the kid, from what can be seen, sure looks like Smeg

more in depth info

We've seen it before. There's some stuff in the Wiki:

 
Personally I’m a bit gutted they won’t be at the wedding of the year, I’d have loved to have seen what she turned up wearing! I can’t believe he’s still banging on about his security in the UK being an issue
The last society wedding they rolled up to she looked an absolute fright. Like they had been shagging in the back of the Range Rover en route (poor chauffeur!) and she’d piled a load of loo roll on top of her head before exiting the vehicle.
 
Yea because you're so much more important than anyone else 🤮
What a pretentious wanker! Seriously handbag, spin it however you want but we know YOU WERE NOT INVITED COS YOU'RE A PRICK...
View attachment 2974947 q
Next puff piece will probably be that Harold was iinvited to be the monarch after QEII passed, but he turned it down due to challenges. The challenge being the LOS, and also he would use a crayon to sign his name.

This film tells you all about it. It's true, Tom Quinn said so.

Screenshot_20240606_090647_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
The article saying they were invited but chose not to go smacks of such desperation.

it serves them right after all their shenanigans with Thomas Markle’s wedding invite. The idea that William can happily be an usher but Harry can’t even step into the country due to his ‘security concerns’ is such a nonsense

every time I look at Meghan I can’t stop looking at her terrible veneers. They look too long. Terrible work
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top