Harry & Meghan #405 Harry, you've got the wrong number!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Apparently Keir Starmer is urging the met police to investigate Andrew now but surely that's out of their remit if he didn't commit a crime in London🫠 I'm posting this here as the Epstein thread is full of contention.

Either way it's not good news for any of the RF having all this brought up again. Charles needs to realise that his family reputation is currently in the bin. It's only a matter of time before Hazno does something as stupid as his uncle.
 
Elsa929 said:
After l


The physicist in this interview is pretty convinced that JE was involved in the “intelligence world.” The investigative reporter also had suspicions. AD, the lawyer for JE does not think he was, but he did elaborate how connected JE was in Harvard. If true JE was in the “intelligence world” it could be that there are forces at play using PA to take down the monarchy and the Commonwealth.
I suspect there is much much more to the story than we will ever know.
Click to expand...
I agree and this has turned into a frenzy with revived stories involving a Spitting Images puppet, and Jane Doe 3 saying that she was "forced to have sex with" PA in 3 geographical locations.
The accuser is anonymous but the accused is all over the press.
Did PA know she was forced, did she tell him?
Apparently PA knew that GM and JE were trafficking girls. How do they know he knew?
The Met Police won't confirm or deny that VG was trafficked into the UK, which would have a bearing on her UK accusation against him (that he settled for 12M.)
Is the report about PA having an orgy with six non-English speaking girls true? Six?

At this stage these seem to be allegations, and not new ones. There are few if any public figures who could have these headlines written about them without proof. It's because of who he is. "Clinton likes them young" apparently, and this is OK for him but not for PA.

The fact that Jeffrey Epstein was eliminated suggests this is far bigger and murkier than PA, who is a minnow here. He's been made the focus, but who benefits? The Sandringham Church walk just before these headlines, which BP knew were coming? I feel there's more going on re. the RF.
There should be no link between these allegations and forcing PA to give up the Royal Lodge lease.
A report running alongside that C can't strip PA of his titles or place in the LoS as it would take an Act of Parliament. Handy for the Sussexes to know, reassuring. But I don't think it's true, he could but he won't.
 
Last edited:
Scotch Mist said:
Apparently Keir Starmer is urging the met police to investigate Andrew now but surely that's out of their remit if he didn't commit a crime in London🫠 I'm posting this here as the Epstein thread is full of contention.

Either way it's not good news for any of the RF having all this brought up again. Charles needs to realise that his family reputation is currently in the bin. It's only a matter of time before Hazno does something as stupid as his uncle.
Click to expand...

BiB If he hasn't already....
 
Scotch Mist said:
Apparently Keir Starmer is urging the met police to investigate Andrew now but surely that's out of their remit if he didn't commit a crime in London🫠 I'm posting this here as the Epstein thread is full of contention.

Either way it's not good news for any of the RF having all this brought up again. Charles needs to realise that his family reputation is currently in the bin. It's only a matter of time before Hazno does something as stupid as his uncle.
Click to expand...

Well 17 months of investigation by the MET before wasn't enough. Right?
Hence why Giuffre didn't respond to the offer of deposition of Andrew on neutral ground.
It had to be the USA, or...somebody may question things...like Quash motions by ''journalists .''
Why Harry?
Maybe it will be someone else, we don't know.
 
LadyMuck said:
It was on one of these threads, many times, at that time.

We questioned if it was photoshop
Click to expand...
I know I usually just lurk but I remember this being discussed at that time on here. Despite the photo embargo, someone (probably backgrid) got a sequence of photos of Charles walking on his own down those stairs. In all of the others found on the Internet at that time, h and m were not behind Charles at all. Suddenly scabies posted the one with them in it. Her face is too thin I'm sorry for that period so is an old photo of her. The general consensus on here at that time was it was definitely fake. No one can change my mind on that.
 
Dooley Doo said:
I remember around the time Fred and Mary's engagement announcement that Fred was a bit of a playboy and may be he was settling down.

What's that saying, oh yeh, a leopard doesn't change it's spots.
Click to expand...
It is mandatory that the spouses that marry in to the DRF are foreign.
It's a policy of ''keep the past of the married in another country.
It then creates a different issue , the potential to basically ''force'' (it wouldn't be to obvious publicity )separations of Royals whose choice is domestic .
But Fredo is a special case, still they are popular and liked.
 
Churchill's Ghost said:
Oh waaaauggghhhh, the grieving King who had just lost both parents in a short amount of time and now had the pressure of taking the crown wasn't warm and nurturing enough to the Stoats...

nypost.com

Meghan Markle, Prince Harry were ‘alienated’ at last gathering with King Charles: expert

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex joined the royal family at Westminster Abbey in Sept. 2022 for the late Queen Elizabeth II’s funeral.
nypost.com nypost.com
Click to expand...

What a bunch of hooey this article is. Body language expert - that's a laugh. And weren't the photos on the staircase taken by a photographer with a long range lens set up by Smegs and Haznoballs, as I remember? They have no problem at all exploiting the King's grief by setting him up as he prepares to meet his mother's coffin. Disgusting.
 
Scotch Mist said:
Apparently Keir Starmer is urging the met police to investigate Andrew now but surely that's out of their remit if he didn't commit a crime in London🫠 I'm posting this here as the Epstein thread is full of contention.

Either way it's not good news for any of the RF having all this brought up again. Charles needs to realise that his family reputation is currently in the bin. It's only a matter of time before Hazno does something as stupid as his uncle.
Click to expand...
Keir Starmer should check out JE's black book - he needs to ask questions why his Labour chums TB and AC appear in it before he invites either of them to continue to provide their services to his party.
 
Scotch Mist said:
Apparently Keir Starmer is urging the met police to investigate Andrew now but surely that's out of their remit if he didn't commit a crime in London🫠 I'm posting this here as the Epstein thread is full of contention.

Either way it's not good news for any of the RF having all this brought up again. Charles needs to realise that his family reputation is currently in the bin. It's only a matter of time before Hazno does something as stupid as his uncle.
Click to expand...

Detraction from Tonny Blair and his bossom buddy Bill
 
Rosesarepink said:
Canada House was the sweaty pits day
Click to expand...
The timeline we were fed wasn't necessarily true, when they went to Canada, what they did and if they were invited to Sandringham for Christmas but chose Canada instead as we were told. We have no idea how, when or why they left the UK and likely never will.

I think the purpose of the trip to the UK for the Platinum Jubilee was to "bring the children" so that later the Sussexes could say that Chuck had met them, and the Queen too.
This was duly reported everywhere. Initial articles said that "PC and the Duchess of Cornwall" both met the Flatpacks. Soon afterwards C's wife was removed, and the press reports now read that Prince Charles had an emotional meeting with his grandchildren at the PJ.
Why was his wife removed? Did she meet them or not?
Of course this has never been commented upon.
Harald's speech at HM's funeral implying that she'd met the Flatpacks was slippery.
 
AGC Blind
42. ENTERTAINMENT LAWYER 01/04 **13**
The alliterate one dropped a long long time friend because she thought the friend would make her look bad by association. Can we expect the same thing with the offspring of the royal who have been feeding news and gossip to the alliterate one. Will she dump them because they would make her look bad by association. Meghan Markle/Jessica Mulroney/Princess Eugenie (Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Just Vacationed in Portugal — and May Have Visited a Royal Relative: Report) (BLIND ITEM REVEALED 02/26/23
)
Will Eug now get markled by her association?
or if the rumours are true re the Y sisters allegedly used for financial purposes, then Smeg could jump on a 'victims of JE et al' cause bandwagon gig ??
the prospect is 🤮 (as is the rumour).
 
I Should Know Better said:
What a bunch of hooey this article is. Body language expert - that's a laugh. And weren't the photos on the staircase taken by a photographer with a long range lens set up by Smegs and Haznoballs, as I remember? They have no problem at all exploiting the King's grief by setting him up as he prepares to meet his mother's coffin. Disgusting.
Click to expand...
I sourced the Getty original here.
The overlay is called ''film grain'' (there are others) it is used to create the ''paparazzi illusion '' to enable claims that one didn't call them, or in this case that the Palace wouldn't allow it.
Of course the one where the Harkles are photographed from the inside (was it Queens funeral ?) are confirming this.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top