Harry and Meghan #75 Hostage Haz out for show, blink once for yes and twice for no

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
I am convinced that Hazzbean was totally duped. Meghan probably did everything she could to convince him that she'd be an amazing royal wife, they'd use their platform to do great things, she wanted nothing more than to settle down in the UK...when in reality she had no intention of sticking around as a junior royal.
 
Gildinwen-TKB said:
He joined in the teasing calling her "limpet". I think he thought Meghan was a Hollywood actress, and big stuff and he could one up his brother, not realising that her biggest role to date has been as supporting role on a cable show filmed in Canada
Click to expand...
Either way, they were close friends. A bit rich of Harry calling Kate limpet, when Meghan is literally a glorified stalker. Clutching him with her claws, following him to his friends wedding abroad while they were split up. Harry really is dim isn’t he, a quick google search would have proved that MM is not a big deal and a legend in her own mind.

Oh wait sorry I forgot, M and H don’t have access to google, neither of them looked each other up online. They just fell madly in love, nothing contrived about it at all ;)
 
1e91zi.jpeg

Harry in a nut shell

Screen Shot 2021-03-14 at 8.59.30 AM.png


Let's hope Harry has this much sense once the divorce from Meghan begins
 
buflesse said:
I am convinced that Hazzbean was totally duped. Meghan probably did everything she could to convince him that she'd be an amazing royal wife, they'd use their platform to do great things, she wanted nothing more than to settle down in the UK...when in reality she had no intention of sticking around as a junior royal.
Click to expand...
I agree. I don’t think Harry was complicit in her games at all! She would have painted this picture that she’s a humanitarian, just like his mum. Loved breaking tradition, just like his mum. Wanted to use her platform to make a real difference, just like his mum. And the poor guy is not very intelligent and clearly has a weakness when it comes to Diana. He fell for it very easily.
 
Just a quick Google reveals that this Charlie Hebdo cover has received criticism from all quarters.

I cant say I’m pressed about it. Personally, I think CH tries too hard to be outrageous and it makes me roll my eyes more than feel rage. Plus it isn’t particularly well drawn. Just a sad attempt to shock.
 
buflesse said:
I am convinced that Hazzbean was totally duped. Meghan probably did everything she could to convince him that she'd be an amazing royal wife, they'd use their platform to do great things, she wanted nothing more than to settle down in the UK...when in reality she had no intention of sticking around as a junior royal.
Click to expand...

That's EXACTLY what happened. Read this expose on MM (they go more into detail about it)
www.exposingsmg.com

The Scandalous Truth About Prince Harry and Meghan Markle — Scandalous Media

Here is Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's full relationship timeline and how they've been shady from the start plus some crazy things exposed!
www.exposingsmg.com www.exposingsmg.com
 
mb1202 said:
I agree. I don’t think Harry was complicit in her games at all! She would have painted this picture that she’s a humanitarian, just like his mum. Loved breaking tradition, just like his mum. Wanted to use her platform to make a real difference, just like his mum. And the poor guy is not very intelligent and clearly has a weakness when it comes to Diana. He fell for it very easily.
Click to expand...


Childhood trauma will do that for you 🙁
 
Twocats said:
Perhaps they decided to share the cards this year because so many people will be facing their first Mothers Day without their Mothers because of Covid.
Click to expand...
I can see I fell victim there to the "Tattle zombie post" 🧟‍♂️ my half written, unposted words popping up within s new post to make me look sloppy!

I did think back to the "feral" comment when they posted the latest earth mother barefoot 🦶 photo. 🤨
 
Appleblossom said:
I had an interesting conversation with my sister in law this morning.
I commented that the spark has gone out of Catherine. She has lost that light she had in her eyes. You can see it in the video and photos from both the school visit with William and her visit to Clapham Common. She appears really distracted.
During their engagement and early marriage she was tore to shreds, as was her family. She had to give up her job in Jigsaw because the paparazzi were always there, jumping at her and hiding in peoples gardens. The video clips are online.
She never lost that spark though. She carried on with warmth and dignity, endearing herself to everyone.
This is different though, it's not just her and the Middletons.
It’s the Queen, Charles, William, the whole Monarchy really but more importantly her children. There has been viciousness, nastiness and even death threats directed at the children. We know 99% of the death threats are headcases with an internet connection but it only takes one headcase with a gun.
My sister in law said that one of her clients has expressed concerns that William might step down to protect Catherine and his children.
We know he is as hard as nails but would he give the Monarchy up to protect his family?
He would essentially be giving it to H&M.
Did they know what they were doing when they made Catherine the scapegoat in that interview?
Click to expand...
I don’t think William and Catherine would give anything up , certainly not to that dimwit spoilt arse and his appalling, lying manipulative Wife.

Catherine is bound to be upset, both at the interview and when paying her respects at Clapham.
 
mardymare said:
İ think it's a sweet gesture to share the cards at a time when a lot of people are not being able to see their mothers or remembering them. They created cards for TQ and PP's anniversary too. Very relateable to everyone who keeps children's artwork on the walls......
Click to expand...

Yep, it absolutely is in line with stuff they've done publicly re: the kids before many times.

Does it also serve the current sleazy propaganda war that they've been dragged into unwillingly? Yes. And why the duck not?

Let's not forget how Hazno has bogarted his mother's memory, and his wife has bogarted her image and attempted to BECOME Harry's mother. How the duck is William supposed to feel about that? Great? She has cynically taken and weaponized her image for her own cynical, greedy purposes. Diana was the mother of TWO sons (who got on fine for 35 years until Markle appeared) and Meghan Markle has NO right to steal Diana's identity and legacy.

Let's just sit back a moment and wonder how we'd all feel in normal life about the kind of girlfriend/wife who DRESSES UP AS HER INTENDED'S DEAD MOTHER on the regular? Who buys a perfume she would not normally wear and decides to smell like her intended's deceased mother on their alleged first date? I think everyone, but everyone including people who 'support' Meghan and Harry would feel it was nasty, weird and actually quite psychotic if this wasn't a weird celeb war with a nominally 'black' woman who they have decided they need to suppport because of dumb identity politics.

So if the Cambridge's issue of their children's drawings helps nudge the public and the Sussex's memory and remind them that yes, William lost the same mother as Harry, and isn't sitting in a chicken coop in California with a dodgy foreign cow determined to shatter her sons' relationship with each other and destroy their family, I say good for them.
 
NotaHincher said:
They're not in Norfolk though, the children are back at school so therefore they will be at Kensington Palace. They were out on official duties in London this week too. Also, there were a lot of people not wearing masks, it was taken on somebody's mobile. I doubt she's shallow enough to use a murdered woman as a pr stunt. Unlike the other one who took her own photographer, watermaked the pic so she got the publication money.
Click to expand...

And she always makes sure her clothes are advertised via Meghan’s Mirror!
Perhaps we should do one called Catherine’s Closet with all money made via affiliate links going to the Cambridge’s charity!
 
Doc said:
Just a quick Google reveals that this Charlie Hebdo cover has received criticism from all quarters.

I cant say I’m pressed about it. Personally, I think CH tries too hard to be outrageous and it makes me roll my eyes more than feel rage. Plus it isn’t particularly well drawn. Just a sad attempt to shock.
Click to expand...

EXACTLY, Charlie Hebdo always try SO HARD to be inflammatory just to get some coverage 😒
 
Fushiafaro said:
Long time lurker of these threads (admittedly hard to keep up at the speed of them recently 👏 👏). One thing I just can’t understand is the interview; what was the end game here? Surely they can’t have thought that the allegations and statements they made couldn’t be relatively easy to fact check.

Genuinely, what did they expect this interview to do?

One scenario I keep thinking of is Oprah may have helped when they first left to find ‘freedom’ (financially or by providing contacts/housing) and the interview was Oprah collecting her dues. Either way it was pretty shoddy interviewing technique on Os part (no follow up Qs, leading Qs and not exploring a balanced view) it’s not something that would fly if the interview conducted by a British reporter.
Click to expand...
I my opinion, and I have said this before on another thread.... I think they are wanting a Negotiation, titles, security , a role in the Commonwealth,. could be wrong. Also, H hasn't got access to all his funds yet and the accountants probably pointed out how long they could go on for. Mind you they got 7 mil from Oprah for the show so that should help for a while !
 
mb1202 said:
Either way, they were close friends. A bit rich of Harry calling Kate limpet, when Meghan is literally a glorified stalker. Clutching him with her claws, following him to his friends wedding abroad while they were split up. Harry really is dim isn’t he, a quick google search would have proved that MM is not a big deal and a legend in her own mind.

Oh wait sorry I forgot, M and H don’t have access to google, neither of them looked each other up online. They just fell madly in love, nothing contrived about it at all ;)
Click to expand...
Something about those photos from the inskip wedding has me thinking she stalked him there after she broke up with her and stopped taking her calls. She got there and told him she was knocked up as he was away from his family and looked panicked in some photos. I could be imaginjng things, of course. Just a gut feel
 
Did anyone here read Omad Scabies book? There's a few inconsistencies with what Meghan now claims... I can't even be arsed to read that book again, but the Googling thing is bogus, i am 99% sure the book claims Meghan did a quick google.

xforeverlove21 said:
View attachment 481621 qView attachment 481622 q
View attachment 481628 qView attachment 481630 q
View attachment 481631 qView attachment 481634 q


Her Diana obsession is so creepy
Click to expand...

I read somewhere that Meghan wears the same perfume as Diana....
 
mb1202 said:
Here is a prime example of the level of intelligence and lack of critical thought displayed by MM fans.

This person is referring to Piers Morgan in their comment. She accuses him of being an incel- a married man with 4 kids. Says he felt entitled to M’s time and friendship- she was the one who got in touch with piers to milk all his industry knowledge and contacts, then dropped him because that’s what she does. His supposed vitriolic rant that this person describes in fact just consisted of him saying, in a fairly shouty way, that he didn’t believe her. And to top it all off the phrase lived experience rounds off the comment! Full marks for stupidity and ignorance here. I despair/feel sick when I read these sorts of comments. View attachment 481604 q
Click to expand...
Piers's wife Celia Walden is stunning, intelligent and feisty!
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top