hehehe
VIP Member
Sure hope they actually have some evidence to unleash that will shut up Ginge and Cringe's fans once and for all instead of alleging and alleging.It's like Christmas Day for the UK papers, as they get to really unleash.
Sure hope they actually have some evidence to unleash that will shut up Ginge and Cringe's fans once and for all instead of alleging and alleging.It's like Christmas Day for the UK papers, as they get to really unleash.
Hoo, there's quite a bit of dirt buried in that article. Richard Kay is clearly sitting on quite a lot.
Even the Australian trip got a wee mention... The tea is going to be spilled folksWhat a fab headline ...
UK Home | Daily Mail Online
I forgot about that sermon. Everyone's reactions were priceless!Posted this on the last thread and got a fair few likes but has to be said again:
Meghan needs to actually shut tf up with this narrative that it was so difficult. She got the wedding, the titles, the multi million pound refurbished cottage, the patronages, the wardrobe. She got invited to Sandringham at Christmas before they were married which is against protocol. Charles walked her down the aisle. She had the wedding planned to her spec with that gospel choir and ridiculously inappropriate preacher. She was not silenced or mistreated, she just expected she would come in and be the new Diana and it didn’t happen, the public saw straight through her.
This interview will be the end for them. Anyone with a brain will see meghans hubris, arrogance and beady little eyes, and Harry’s sweaty, under-the-thumb nonsense. Get rid of their titles QEII !
Anyone else think it’s insane that this trashy nobody was able to bully members of the royal household? Meghan seems to think it’s because she’s important and worthy, when in fact it’s purely due to the line of succession and also the queens affection for Harry. Anyone that married him would have been afforded the same courtesies. She isn’t special or worthy, she’s a nobody and a bullyA better link
https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...-inside-story-fairytale-turned-nightmare.html
Did you also suggest they were a pweirdo? Just to throw in the "what about Andrew" narrative as well ;-)On Twitter i found some sugar using Archie's photo as their avatar and the Christmas card as their header.
I told them I thought it was creepy using a photo of somebody else's child and that they were invading Archie's privacy.
I reported them and then blocked them
I doubt it'll have any effect but it amused me for 2 minutes.
Not sure if this was implied or not by your comment, but MM fans are so quick to throw in ‘well Andrew is a n o n ce’ ‘why aren’t you focusing on the paedophile’. Firstly, he’s a strange and shady man obviously, can’t deny it. But I disagree that paedohile is a fair assessment. 17 year old girls, unacceptable and weird yes but not paedophilic. Doesn’t mean we can’t criticise Meghan too!Did you also suggest they were a ponce? Just to throw in the "what about Andrew" narrative as well ;-)
Zara and Mike Tindall were genuinely trying not to laugh. HilariousI forgot about that sermon. Everyone's reactions were priceless!
An American work ethic?? Scobie clearly's forgotten that Knauf is American, too...so presumably would have known if it was just the work ethics clashing there. Scobie is such an obedient yappy lap dog. Oh wait, don't mean to offend any dogs!Omid via Harpers Bazaar is going for the expected dribble about this being a conspiracy to smear a confident woman of colour who has 'an American work ethic'
Duchess Meghan Is “Disturbed” by Palace Aide’s Bullying Claims: “They Knew It Would Get Ugly”
After being accused of causing “emotional distress” to Kensington Palace staff, sources and friends close to the Sussexes speak out.www.harpersbazaar.com
America, where all men are created equal, should have nothing to do with a power-crazed, tea-throwing Duchess reducing junior women staff to tears, and leaving them shaking with fear.
She'd fit in nicely in North Korea though, maybe a prisoner exchange could be negotiated?
Omid via Harpers Bazaar is going for the expected dribble about this being a conspiracy to smear a confident woman of colour who has 'an American work ethic'
Duchess Meghan Is “Disturbed” by Palace Aide’s Bullying Claims: “They Knew It Would Get Ugly”
After being accused of causing “emotional distress” to Kensington Palace staff, sources and friends close to the Sussexes speak out.www.harpersbazaar.com
America, where all men are created equal, should have nothing to do with a power-crazed, tea-throwing Duchess reducing junior women staff to tears, and leaving them shaking with fear.
She'd fit in nicely in North Korea though, maybe a prisoner exchange could be negotiated?
Bet it was that SturgeonBBC Scotland just accidentally showed part of Phil's obituary.
Agree it seems inexcusable but I think the race issue was a massive problem for the RF and they tiptoed around an unstable Hazzno plus Minge and her aggression like a UXB. H&M had the RF where they wanted them and held the race issue like a loaded gun to their heads.To see if lessons can be learned. Wtf is that about. Bit late for that now
I’d argue that Robbie and Madonna would be Divas, but MM is a sociopath. She honestly thinks she is deserving of ultimate fame, adoration and wealth, and no criticism. Kind of hilarious when you think about her objectively- middle aged ex yacht girl marries dumb prince. The only interesting part about her is that she married a prince but when you look into Harry’s favourite hotspots and hangouts it really becomes very accessible, especially for a woman who was an avid reader of the book ‘the Rules’ a 90s book about how to marry up, and was also Diana’s biggest fan.From the article...
One of those employees, personal assistant Melissa Toubati, left Kensington Palace in October 2018 after reportedly being “driven to tears,” according to British tabloid reports at the time. An aide anonymously defended the abrupt departure, quickly giving a glowing account of her tenure to the Daily Mail. However, it later emerged in court documents during Meghan’s privacy case against The Mail on Sunday that Toubati had, in fact, been dismissed from her role by the couple due to misconduct (the details of which are known to this author but cannot be repeated for legal reasons). In the Sussex biography, Finding Freedom, sources revealed that it was Knauf’s longtime friendship with Toubati that had led the Sussexes to believe that certain staff, including their own press secretary, were “more interested in protecting one of their own than [Meghan].”
Did I miss it being made public that it was Melissa Toubati dismissed for misconduct? I’m sure I read she worked for Robbie and Madonna who are probably pretty demanding (I do at least hope Robbie is nice with it though!). There was also a nanny fired in the middle of the night wasn’t there?
As for that final sentence (in bold), you’ve got to ask yourself why would this even be a source of conflict if nothing was going on? For what reason would any of the aides have for wanting to ‘smear’ her if she was a genuinely kind and compassionate person? We are talking about people where this is their job/career, they have so much to lose and for what, because they are supposedly just a bunch of racists? I don’t know how people can keep defending her.
I love how Omid has to get in that he knows the reasons why Toubati was dismissed, but can’t say. head.
It’s unraveling at speed - Royal reporter claiming she witnessed the poor behaviour
Revenge of the Sussex survivors' club: How fairytale turned nightmare
#
Honeychild, do you think that smeggy would answer such a thing truthfully? She might(at a pinch and to look cooperative,) gift them a tiny morsel of something that could be swatted aside as of no importance, but any genuine dirt will remain buried carefully. She'll fob them off with "Well I feel I could have been more assertive in my support of BLM in the MylittlePony mess *sad face and wonky are-you-ok eyebrows * ... or some such tit and job done.In my corporate PR past if you were about to launch a client CEO onto some major media platform (tv interview/fly-on-the-wall documentary/Question Time etc) you would automatically hold a pre-launch meeting along the lines of 'Soooo Mr/Ms CEO, it's great that you're doing this gig but we all know some people aren't going to like your style/views/tie colour & it could get a bit hairy on social and/or in print. Can you just run us through any skeletons in your past that people might use against you so we can draft some messaging and role play appropriate responses? All under client confidentiality of course.'
Seems to me it would be a dereliction of duty if Sunshine Sucks or CBS' equivalent hadn't done the same with the Harkles pre Orca.
Which is a long way of saying do you think they're ahead of the game on this with media messaging and even filmed interview sections all pre-prepared? I so don't want that to be the case. The thought of them scrabbling around & firefighting is delicious. But they must have known it was/could be coming. No?