Scotch Mist
VIP Member
According to this poster on Quora Meghan is going to lay into Uncle Andrew:
'Meghan is a mouth, a mouth that most of the time speaks a load of gibberish and word salad that she seems to believe shows how intelligent and ‘woke’ she is.
As far as I can remember, her major gripe as a member of the RF was that she wasn’t able to stand on her soap box and refute every little negative thing that was reported in the media. She wasn’t able to phone editors or write letters to to the papers giving her ‘side of the story’.
But BP staff apparently checked every single little fact that Meghan wanted denied - and they found there was at least an element of truth in everything that appeared. Rebuttal, therefore, was impossible.
Had Meghan really read the books about Diana, she would have known way in advance what the media could do to members of the RF. She loves everything that is said about her; negative or positive, so long as her name is appearing in print, she doesn’t seem to care, so claiming persecution by the media is a false claim from the start.
She is unconcerned that rumours have been circulating that Archie was born to a surrogate - something that must almost certainly be true or she would have sued already. Were I in Meghan’s shoes and this was the rumour, were it untrue, I would have scotched in right when they started.
As a member of the RF, she was sufficiently briefed beforehand to know that one of the penalties of the position she was happy to assume was that she could not be controversial. If she wanted her ‘voice’ to be heard, then she should have found another mate and not chosen to marry into the most famous family in the world.
Somewhere along the line, she has been told she has a ‘powerful’ voice - but that’s because she doesn’t listen to it. I have yet to hear her say a single thing that resonates with the world today.
She isn’t exhorting people not to stand by while children in poor countries in Africa and elsewhere are starving; or suffering curable eye infections that provision of a simple and inexpensive drug could alleviate; or railing against leaders whose people are living in poverty and fear; or helping with disabled and disadvantaged children in her own country. Or any number of other burning issues around the globe.
No! She just spouts meaningless platitudes either using her own, jumbled sentences or plagiarising other people’s.
I expect more of the same from the interview but if, as seems to have been said, she talks about Prince Andrew in a derogatory way, I hope he sues her for all she has - and wins. Arrogant and rude he may be but he has not, as yet, been found guilty of any crime - and, anyway, what right has she got to talk, on a public forum, about individual members of The Firm?
Sorry, but I am hoping this interview puts Meghan Markle firmly in her place. That she proves herself to have no moral compass and, therefore, is more or less unemployable.
Through marriage, she had one of the best jobs going - an ability to influence, help and support people throughout the world. She blew it - and I hope now people realise who she is and what she stands for: and it certainly isn’t charity, benevolence, kindness and consideration of others.
Harry, I hope you’re happy with your controller!'
'Meghan is a mouth, a mouth that most of the time speaks a load of gibberish and word salad that she seems to believe shows how intelligent and ‘woke’ she is.
As far as I can remember, her major gripe as a member of the RF was that she wasn’t able to stand on her soap box and refute every little negative thing that was reported in the media. She wasn’t able to phone editors or write letters to to the papers giving her ‘side of the story’.
But BP staff apparently checked every single little fact that Meghan wanted denied - and they found there was at least an element of truth in everything that appeared. Rebuttal, therefore, was impossible.
Had Meghan really read the books about Diana, she would have known way in advance what the media could do to members of the RF. She loves everything that is said about her; negative or positive, so long as her name is appearing in print, she doesn’t seem to care, so claiming persecution by the media is a false claim from the start.
She is unconcerned that rumours have been circulating that Archie was born to a surrogate - something that must almost certainly be true or she would have sued already. Were I in Meghan’s shoes and this was the rumour, were it untrue, I would have scotched in right when they started.
As a member of the RF, she was sufficiently briefed beforehand to know that one of the penalties of the position she was happy to assume was that she could not be controversial. If she wanted her ‘voice’ to be heard, then she should have found another mate and not chosen to marry into the most famous family in the world.
Somewhere along the line, she has been told she has a ‘powerful’ voice - but that’s because she doesn’t listen to it. I have yet to hear her say a single thing that resonates with the world today.
She isn’t exhorting people not to stand by while children in poor countries in Africa and elsewhere are starving; or suffering curable eye infections that provision of a simple and inexpensive drug could alleviate; or railing against leaders whose people are living in poverty and fear; or helping with disabled and disadvantaged children in her own country. Or any number of other burning issues around the globe.
No! She just spouts meaningless platitudes either using her own, jumbled sentences or plagiarising other people’s.
I expect more of the same from the interview but if, as seems to have been said, she talks about Prince Andrew in a derogatory way, I hope he sues her for all she has - and wins. Arrogant and rude he may be but he has not, as yet, been found guilty of any crime - and, anyway, what right has she got to talk, on a public forum, about individual members of The Firm?
Sorry, but I am hoping this interview puts Meghan Markle firmly in her place. That she proves herself to have no moral compass and, therefore, is more or less unemployable.
Through marriage, she had one of the best jobs going - an ability to influence, help and support people throughout the world. She blew it - and I hope now people realise who she is and what she stands for: and it certainly isn’t charity, benevolence, kindness and consideration of others.
Harry, I hope you’re happy with your controller!'
