Harry and Meghan #45 Still flapping their gums and talking out their bums

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Justhereforthedrama said:


Baroness Bruck has on Twitter pointed out that the photo shared by Chris Ship has Hazza with a bloody eye. Other news outlets have shared a clear eye. I’m guessing they didn’t catch that when they first sent the headshots out and then sent a new, updated version without the bloody eye.

but what gives?
View attachment 279337 q
Click to expand...


Welcome to our new posters * waves **

I'm really worried to see Harry's bloodshot eye. Reminds me in a really bad way of friends who had lost control over their habits. What's going on over there?

I cannot believe this shot is out there. Chris Ship of ITV is pro-Harkles and pro-Meghan and is pretty close to being a PR rather than a journalist, so why did they give him this picture?
 
I was really pleased when Harry was given "permission" to marry Ms Markle. I thought that it was fabulous that at last the British Family were joining this century and a modern divorced woman was welcomed. Although I didn't realise for a long time that Ms Markle was biracial. When I saw Doria, I realised that Markle is biracial and I thought good on you HMQ for agreeing with Harry's choice.
I didn't take much notice of the negative stories in the press. I'm old and I remember all the women, and it's always the women, getting incredibly negative and cruel stories about them. Diana, not so much in the beginning. Sarah Ferguson was slated, Waity Katie took a pasting too. Camilla was hammered by the press.
I thought that announcing the pregnancy on October 15th and at Eugenie's wedding was tactless. All the bump clutching was tedious and boring. When Archie was born, his parents behaved like children, no photos. I understood the not wanting to stand on the steps, in full make up. Archie isn't all that important in the line of succession. So ok, carry on with the secrecy.
it did piss me off that they didn't seem to understand that as working members of a taxpayer funded family they have duties to perform.

I thought the interview in Africa was extremely tone deaf. Ms Markle is in one of the most deprived areas of the World and she's whining about Not being OK. She has access to untold wealth, palaces, fabulous stately homes, couture clothes, servants on tap and more luxury than most people can only dream of and she's whining.
The final straw for me was the statement on Instagram, saying that they're stepping away, but they will continue to collaborate with HMQ. Then saying that they can use the term Royal, because the Queen doesn't own that word.
That's when my duck you attitude kicked in, who the duck do they think that they are.
Sorry for the rant, but those two really piss me off now.
 
Just_me1954 said:
harrymarkle.wordpress.com

Ulterior Motives, And Staged Narratives Of The Sussex Saga

The Sussexes claimed they wanted to flee the UK for privacy reasons, yet we know that was untrue. What they wanted was control and free reign to market themselves (money and fame), and to do and sa…
harrymarkle.wordpress.com harrymarkle.wordpress.com

Latest harry markle
Click to expand...

Since we all know Hazno has only 2 brain cells, we can assume it was all Megzy’s idea. He just went along because she had his 2 veg in her hand....
 
Mikesqueen said:
Since we all know Hazno has only 2 brain cells, we can assume it was all Megzy’s idea. He just went along because she had his 2 veg in her hand....
Click to expand...

I've never really thought the control she and the people around her seem to have over Haz was about sex (after the first week or two, anyway) Other things, maybe.

Wonder what Harry Markle is driving at in their latest with this bit

I realize that some people have given up hope, and believe that the duo have ‘won’ and have achieved their aims, but I assure you that there is ‘activity’ behind the scenes. Stooges might have to become fall guys (they should think carefully between now and Christmas as to which side to take), and loyalty to the wrong faction never ends well, as those who supported the Congiura dei Pazzi discovered to their peril.

A friend recently mentioned RICO to me, and then for the past few nights while watching Law & Order, a couple of cases involving RICO were mentioned. A coincidence maybe, but then again I’ve never believed in such things.
 
Baguette said:
I've never really thought the control she and the people around her seem to have over Haz was about sex (after the first week or two, anyway) Other things, maybe.

Wonder what Harry Markle is driving at in their latest with this bit

I realize that some people have given up hope, and believe that the duo have ‘won’ and have achieved their aims, but I assure you that there is ‘activity’ behind the scenes. Stooges might have to become fall guys (they should think carefully between now and Christmas as to which side to take), and loyalty to the wrong faction never ends well, as those who supported the Congiura dei Pazzi discovered to their peril.

A friend recently mentioned RICO to me, and then for the past few nights while watching Law & Order, a couple of cases involving RICO were mentioned. A coincidence maybe, but then again I’ve never believed in such things.
Click to expand...

I have a limited understanding of a RICO and a Pazzi, so are these two things being directed at the Markles?
 
Wightgirl said:
And casually mentions a ‘dinner’ at the Lucas’ who are neighbours. Translation “I bumped into George in the local shop and said oh we must pick your brains sometime” 😂😂😂
Click to expand...

Had a google. So that was a variation on their usual PR 'top secret dinner with **insert famous name here** with prior ROYAL connection to PRINCE HARRY THE ROYALEST OF ALL ROYALS when **famous name** gives them free advice on cracking Hollywood/The Internet/Netflix/World Peace.

If it got pulled, then George Lucas's PR team said 'please don't try that crap with Mr Lucas, goodbye'. So they got Liza Minelli'd again. :ROFLMAO: :m
 
NotDumbNotBlonde said:
Lady C's latest video is quite short (especially at 1.75x ⚡) and very interesting. She thinks we are seeing a very real side of Harry which M has brought out. She addresses how Diana might have reacted to M. I've actually bought her book The Real Diana on Kindle for £3.75.

Which reminds me, I hope all's well with @PennyCrayon

Click to expand...


Blimey, she never shy's away from calling a spade a spade and tonight was no different ...
 
Scotch Mist said:
Yes that might explain it but why on earth was such an uncomfortable looking piece of furniture chosen for the shoot?
He must have been bloody sore if he had to spend any length of time sat on that wooden arm.
Not that Smeggy would care, as long as she looks good!
Click to expand...
As someone else said, maybe they were advertising the chair, lol! 🤣 Makes no sense at all, but then again, they often don't employ any common sense at all do they. And she looks like she's gurning!

Welcome to all the new people ❤️:m the more the merrier!
 
50sGirl said:
*disclaimer* I’m not a person who usually comments on a persons looks because, well we can’t help what we are born with. However, I make the exception if said person has had cosmetic surgery for vanity reasons so on that note...

Does anyone else think that’s an unflattering photo of Meghantoinette? It’s the angle I think. I immediately thought of the child catcher...

View attachment 279248 qView attachment 279249 q
Click to expand...
I agree. For someone who boasts that she was able to instruct the lighting team on the best lighting to showcase her wondrousness (cos daddy was a lighting guy doncha know:rolleyes:) she's messed this one up. I thought the lighting on that angle only makes her neb look bigger and when I added glasses to the image upthread it seemed to emphasise it even more and I was waiting for accusations that I'd messed around with her nose. Def not guilty yer honour. If she paid for that nose then she should demand a refund.
 
TheSherryEmoji said:
I've noticed a few women TV presenters sporting that awful top Meghan wore - the sludge-coloured one which looks like a determined toddler had yanked it down.

It didn't suit her and it doesn't suit anyone else.

ETA - that is my first post on here. I figured I had to dip my toe into the water eventually. I've been reading these threads for ages. Thanks to all of you for making lockdown more bearable.
Click to expand...
OOOH new blood, welcome.
Good first post. Yes one of our local newsreaders wore a dress with that neckline and it was the ugliest thing ever, quite distracting too.

Missmoorie said:
First post for me.
Thanks for this thread and the earlier one, it's kept me amused for days
Click to expand...
Welcome. Jump in, the water's fine.

Baguette said:
Had a google. So that was a variation on their usual PR 'top secret dinner with **insert famous name here** with prior ROYAL connection to PRINCE HARRY THE ROYALEST OF ALL ROYALS when **famous name** gives them free advice on cracking Hollywood/The Internet/Netflix/World Peace.

If it got pulled, then George Lucas's PR team said 'please don't try that crap with Mr Lucas, goodbye'. So they got Liza Minelli'd again. :ROFLMAO: :m
Click to expand...
Was it actually pulled? :eek:



:m:m:m
 
Last edited:
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top