Harry and Meghan #34 Maleficent Meghan and her Petulant Prince'

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
It works like this:
MM I want to settle lets "drop hands" and put out a lovenkisses statement.
DM duck off
MM I will pay a contribution of a portion of your costs to charity
DM duck off
MM I will pay your costs
DM Either give us £1m and put out a Statement saying sorry or file a "Notice of Dicontinuance" which entitles us automatically to all our costs (assessed) and is Unconditional Surrender and we will then publish all the tit we have been gathering on you and the Princeling and you can crawl back under a rock
MM Harry!


ie because theres no counterclaim she can unilaterally drop the claim. the rarest outcome in litigation because its admitting your claim was worthless whatever you might say; and its murderously expensive.
If she drops it can she take out a super injunction to stop the paper publishing details?
 
What a beauty
 

Attachments

  • 3F93BD67-213C-4EDA-A468-453AE689B459.jpeg
    3F93BD67-213C-4EDA-A468-453AE689B459.jpeg
    24.3 KB · Views: 144
If anyone is interested, Our Ex-Royal Global Billion Dollar Speaker Haz pops up for about 5 minutes at the start of this morning's Zoom chat (the one they are calling a Travalyst Global Summit). Someone has found him a dark jacket and white shirt so no manky T-shirt, thankfully, and he's inside in a study (at last). He read said his pre-prepared word salad, did some nodding at other's peoples comments and then wasn't seen again. I lost the will to live so he might have popped up at the end.

ETA Oh and he is still using Joe Biden's campaign slogan 'Build Back Better'

I’d laugh like duck if the Biden campaign sued him 😂
 
Sorry if anyone has already posted, too many pages to catch up!

But this MWX thing - how accurate is that report? Why is she clinging onto use of the name Markle? How do wage a public war with your father and disassociate yourself from the whole family but still use the family name?

And Harry's never used the name Windsor, he's always been Wales?
But Archie is Archie Mountbatten-Windsor - perhaps a way of tying it to Archewell, and ensuring Archie's global dominance down the track.
 
Sorry if anyone has already posted, too many pages to catch up!

But this MWX thing - how accurate is that report? Why is she clinging onto use of the name Markle? How do wage a public war with your father and disassociate yourself from the whole family but still use the family name?

And Harry's never used the name Windsor, he's always been Wales?
MWX has been the holding company for the Travalyst trademark for a while. It was thought at the time to be a reference to Mountbatten-Windsor which is his family name. It could equally be Markle Wales though.

Legally, the entity is just MWX so it could be Mozzarella Wensleydale for all we know, which would at least be useful.
 


So, the ‘tent’ they stayed in was £1,500 per night. Is this what he’s suggesting we all do for sustainable travel? He really does need to STFU.

https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...tml?ico=amp-comments-viewall#comments-8575601

I just read the comments on that article, someone said 'he's about as relevant as an ashtray on a motorbike'. Sums it up nicely methinks 🤣
 
Why didn’t they realise this lawsuit was a horrible idea? Why didn’t their PR and legal teams warn them? Everyone could see this was a bad idea from the beginning.
I mean, why didn’t she sue the newsgroup for not moderating the comment section enough? That might have worked. Because some people used the critical commenting as an excuse to write some really horrible racist and sexist comments. The authors of the articles were smart and capable enough to write in a way that might have racist and sexist undertones but it could never be proven. If she would have gone out and sued the tit out of the people that actually made racist remakes I would have supported it. There is no place for that. But that would have been unpopular (royal suing private citizens), a lengthy process and expensive.
I don’t think she cares about the actual racism. Maybe she really didn’t realised that she would totally be vilified by the media- like all of them from time to time? But Harry should have bloody known better. Maybe she really believes all the bad press stems from a deeply ingrained racist bias? Or maybe she thought that would be an easy card to play to shut down negative reporting? It all pretty mind boggling. Now it massively backfires, as does the book that was supposed to set the record straight. Why didn’t they realise this wouldn’t work? You cannot be so blind.
I actually hope they stay together and find a way to live peacefully and happily if not for anything else for their poor child. But please, without titles, without a place in the line of succession and financially independent (aka funding their own lifestyle).
 
Just tried to watch Harry speak, managed about a minute...painful. His facial expressions are weird, he just doesn't speak like his former self at all.

I couldn't watch it either. He could barely take his eyes off the script or auto-cue, zero charisma no presence it's embarrassing to watch.

Why didn’t they realise this lawsuit was a horrible idea? Why didn’t their PR and legal teams warn them? Everyone could see this was a bad idea from the beginning.
I mean, why didn’t she sue the newsgroup for not moderating the comment section enough? That might have worked. Because some people used the critical commenting as an excuse to write some really horrible racist and sexist comments. The authors of the articles were smart and capable enough to write in a way that might have racist and sexist undertones but it could never be proven. If she would have gone out and sued the tit out of the people that actually made racist remakes I would have supported it. There is no place for that. But that would have been unpopular (royal suing private citizens), a lengthy process and expensive.
I don’t think she cares about the actual racism. Maybe she really didn’t realised that she would totally be vilified by the media- like all of them from time to time? But Harry should have bloody known better. Maybe she really believes all the bad press stems from a deeply ingrained racist bias? Or maybe she thought that would be an easy card to play to shut down negative reporting? It all pretty mind boggling. Now it massively backfires, as does the book that was supposed to set the record straight. Why didn’t they realise this wouldn’t work? You cannot be so blind.
I actually hope they stay together and find a way to live peacefully and happily if not for anything else for their poor child. But please, without titles, without a place in the line of succession and financially independent (aka funding their own lifestyle).

In a nutshell, they won't listen, she's a schemer who knows it all and he follows along like the doting idiot he is.
 
It's scary watching the sugars on twitter attack Angela Kelly. How they're certain that Omid Scobie version is gospel but also adamant that Megz had nothing to do with the book.


I am a but sensitive and still recovering following my twitter search for Abigail Spencer earlier and getting pictures off her 'playing with her Mary' 🤢 her phone was hacked back in 2016.
I never see the sugars on Twitter ?
Can Charles refuse to pay?
I mean Fergie ran up a £5million overdraft at Coutts in the 90s and had to flog weightwatchers and cranberry juice in the US to pay it off.

Why can’t Charles leave them to it?
it will hasten the divorce:ROFLMAO::LOL:
I think he will soon get sick of funding them while they are carrying on as they are doing
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top