Hi All,
Newbie/lurker here.
Love these H&M threads. It’s all I can do to keep up with them, let alone post.
Slightly off topic perhaps, but I just listened to the Peter Crouch podcast with PW.
So relatable and funny. H should have a listen to hear how it’s done.
Megz (via Rushbrooke) has said they are 'unwilling'. How would she know? What business is it of hers?This from the express, describing her friends as unwilling participants is interesting, I wonder if some/all have refused to appear in court.
Do we know this was privately provided, or without Megan’s knowledge?Megz (via Rushbrooke) has said they are 'unwilling'. How would she know? What business is it of hers?
A bit unfortunate, then, that Friend B has apparently already provided a statement.
It is so drawn out isn’t it. Thought there is no judgement, some interesting tid bits from today!Hearing over, no judgment today.
Still a mystery to me why she's sueing the Mail and not People Magazine, or has that been explained and I've missed it?
Well exactly.
Hello, you’ve arrived amid a right old kerfuffle. Welcome to the thread. Harry has his chance to be relevant and likeable but the stupid boy blew it.
"Vulnerable"? MM is about as vulnerable as a Komodo dragon riding in a Sherman tank.Meghan's attempt to keep friends' names secret in newspaper battle | ITV News
The Duchess of Sussex’s legal team is back in the High Court in her continuing fight with the Mail on Sunday. | ITV National Newswww.itv.com
V good point. Just like Tatler said they did about the K story. Surely a mag/newspaper has to cover itself?
V good point. Just like Tatler said they did about the K story. Surely a mag/newspaper has to cover itself?