Harry and Meghan #3 Duke and Duchess of Narcissism!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
mindlessness said:
^^Apparently he thought H&M were moving too fast. My favourite rumour was the advice from Prince Phillip that you don't marry actresses. Which may or may not be true but sounds very in character from him!
Click to expand...
Yes! I can just imagine him saying this! I also wonder if he made reference to her being American and/or divorced ... He'd remember Wallacegate only too well.
 
Millie0411 said:
But something so obviously untrue to him/his family would be easy to identify the source...? People constantly print stories they'll have another baby etc and his reputation wasn't tarnished. Plus, as people have said in this thread (and as Charles reportedly said himself), the Prince of Wales (current or in waiting) always have affairs.

I can see the argument both ways but we'll never know the truth.
Click to expand...
It's not uncommon for any of the senior royals, remarkably (going to go back to the Duke of Gloucester the predecessor to the current title holder, his eldest son died not exactly sure what he was like as a man to be bluntly honest, but his current successor (formerly a trained architect) 2nd son of the former title holder as such, usually those who don't expect to get which ever title do remarkably well with it.

I can say that probably going back to even Edward I (Longshanks the way with his legs being so incredibly long was at least 6ft tall by own military and Hammer of the Scots in Scotland) son where the title Prince of Wales traces it's roots back to (being that the to be Edward II was born and died (killed by his own nobles after being deposed by them, almost bringing England to the brink of civil war as well) he had at least things to do with Piers Gaveston (not like in the Braveheart film Philip they didn't simply exist) whether or not he was genuinely gay is highly debated but certainly would seem so the way after his father died he was effectively taken out of exile to France, which was utterly hated by his own nobility.

katiesmith81 said:
I can say that probably going back to even Edward I (Longshanks the way with his legs being so incredibly long was at least 6ft tall by own military and Hammer of the Scots in Scotland) son where the title Prince of Wales traces it's roots back to (being that the to be Edward II was born and died (killed by his own nobles after being deposed by them, almost bringing England to the brink of civil war as well) he had at least things to do with Piers Gaveston (not like in the Braveheart film Philip they didn't simply exist) whether or not he was genuinely gay is highly debated but certainly would seem so the way after his father died he was effectively taken out of exile to France, which was utterly hated by his own nobility.
Click to expand...
When taking Piers Gaveston out of exile Edward II made him 1st Earl of Cornwall which really p***ed off the nobility in England.
 
Last edited:
Vera Stanhope said:
Not spending Christmas with the Royal Family shows blatant disregard for the Queen and Duke of Edinburgh at their advanced age.
Harry will regret this when it's too late.
Click to expand...
Divide and conquer........ She's taking him away from his family, using the "much needed time with her mother after a difficult year" as the premise ........ How selfish. The Queen and Duke of Edinburgh are not going to live forever.... No one does..... Harry is an absolute fool.

Looking on the bright side we won't have to see her on Xmas day. It wouldn't surprise me if this is what it's all about. They've embarrassed themselves among the family with the ridiculous Tom Bradbury interview, and feelings towards them within the family is a little frosty..... Understandably so....... So they run away to Lala land. 🙄
 
There are stories now about them ditching the LA Thanksgiving and flying Doria in so they can spare Archie the flight and Meghan can volunteer at a soup kitchen. You know, the same Archie that according to Serena Williams flew out to NY when he was half this age for only a weekend. I think it’s a translation for: you are free to go to the States, but we’re not paying for security on your holiday, kthxbye.
 
Last edited:
Topanga said:
There are stories now about them ditching the LA Thanksgiving and flying Doria in so they can spare Archie the flight and Meghan can volunteer at a soup kitchen. You know, the same Archie that according to Serena Williams flew out to NY when he was half this age for only a weekend. I think it’s a translation for: you are free to go to the States, but we’re not paying for security on your holiday, kthxbye.
Click to expand...

I was sure she would play the card of being a volunteer at an emergency homeless shelter for Christmas (but Thanksgiving : whow...) That's MM...
She wants to be the centre of attention and to portray the BRF being far from people.

SS is on it : a devoted MM, a newly-wed, a brand new mum who wants to be a role model for Archie helping poor people.
We can expect an amount of MM's pals praising her ("she has always been so kind, generous. Motherhood made her an even better person blah blah blah).

I am pretty sure she's already watched and read every single videos & photos of Diana visiting homeless people (key words, facial expressions and dress code). I am looking forward to see photos of her "secret" visit.

I also think those 2 will release photos with Archie in front of their Christmas tree (Archie trying to grab a Christmas star or a Christmas tree ball).

That must be hard for her, after so many efforts, and so much money spent that Kensington's IG has more followers than their IG. I thought she would buy (more) followers.

Today, they share unseen photo from Archie's christening.
https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...-Markle-enjoy-Frogmore-Cottage-Christmas.html
They look pathetic :
1/ constantly use Archie when they get in trouble ;
2/ want to show off a so called special bond Archie would share with Charles except that they don't have any other photo because Charles may have met Archie that day, and may have never seen him since the christening (by the way, Charles doesn't seem to be impressed with Archie) ;
3/ she is spreading 20 rumors/minute because she badly and desesperetly wants people to be the center of attention. She doesn't care if it's bad or good comments, even bad can be useful for her pity party.
 
Last edited:
Another photo from Archie’s Christening.
 

Attachments

  • 80849F2F-AB71-4B42-8C31-A92AB169D46A.png
    80849F2F-AB71-4B42-8C31-A92AB169D46A.png
    126.7 KB · Views: 230
I am actually sad about all this mess. Like Harry said she was coming into the family she never had. If she had played it right, she would have had the adulation that she craves. Instead she is creating a toxic mess. As much as Harry is an arse, he will suffer for this. He will either try and cling on so he can have some form of family life. Or when it does end, he will spiral out of control and who knows what might happen. It’s just sad all round. 😐
 
Harry and Meghan have become full-time professional victims, and want the world to know it.

Am I quoting Piers Morgan.
Yes, yes I am. I love how triggered he gets 🤣

First, back in February, Meghan presented prostitutes with horribly patronizing and inappropriate ‘empowering’ bananas carrying hand-written messages like ‘You are strong’.

Then came her absurdly over-the-top $500,000 celebrity-fuelled baby shower in New York, which took place at the exact same time as she and Harry posted a tweet demanding we all do more to combat poverty.

When their baby Archie arrived in May, they acted in a ridiculously secretive way, hiding even basic details of their newborn son’s birth and refusing to do the normal hospital doorstep press photo. All this while they were merrily spending $3 million of taxpayer money refurbishing their luxury home Frogmore Cottage in Windsor.

In June, Meghan’s security team stopped people taking photos of her at the Wimbledon tennis tournament ‘to protect her privacy’, at the same as she was secretly planning her self-promotional guest editorship of British Vogue magazine.

Then, despite being the only American member of the royal family, she deliberately snubbed President Trump’s state visit, yet appeared at the Queen’s birthday celebration two days later.

In August, Harry and Meghan lectured us about the need for everyone to take personal ownership of their carbon footprint - then promptly hopped on private jets to and from Elton John’s home in the South of France.

This was as hypocritical as their constant preaching about empathy, whilst Meghan has disowned her own distraught father Thomas, just as she’s also disowned myriad family and friends since landing her handsome rich prince.

But it was the couple’s recent royal trip to South Africa that was to prove to be the catalyst for a full-blown sulky meltdown of epic proportions.

It was supposed to be the tour that got the Sussexes ‘back on track’ after their tricky year, and for the first week it was very successfully achieving that aim: they did their duty well, and were unanimously praised by the media for it.

Then, before it had finished, came the bombshell double whammy of Meghan’s lawsuit against the Mail on Sunday newspaper for publishing a letter from her to her father Thomas that he had given the paper, accompanied by a raging and hysterically emotional personal attack on the press by Harry that effectively declared all-out war.

This baffling act of PR self-harm had the disastrous effect of instantly converting all the positive media coverage of the South African tour into gigantic negative coverage.

Things got worse when a documentary of the tour was later broadcast, containing yet more tearfully self-indulgent moaning about media intrusion from the pair of them.

It was inexplicably devoid of self-awareness that they could spend ten days in South Africa meeting some of the most impoverished, damaged and vulnerable people in the world – then use a film about the trip to whine about THEIR ‘struggle’ to exist as privileged multi-millionaire royals.

Can you imagine how this entitled bullsh*t must have sounded to the abused township women they met who’ve survived horrific domestic violence and worry every day about how to put food on the table for their kids?

But that’s the problem with the modern-day snowflake victimhood culture that Harry and Meghan personify – once it takes a grip, all sense of perspective flies out of the super-woke ‘me, me, me’ window.

The documentary also featured Harry sensationally confirming his rift with his brother William ensuring that this huge revelation eclipsed any coverage of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s own big tour of Pakistan.

The royals have a golden rule of never doing anything to overshadow each other’s royal tours but Harry and Meghan deliberately chose to take a wrecking ball to that rule.

That was selfish and stupid.

It also exposed the real problem with the Sussexes: that, in their desperation to be perceived as victims, they seem to have forgotten what it actually means to be a member of the Royal Family, or have any concept of the ‘duty’ that goes with being funded by the tax-payer.

Sorry it's so long, but he summed it up so well.
He enjoys offending people but he’s not wrong all of the time 😬
 
CringeHard said:
It took me a long time but actually yeh if you look at when she stands up as she puts her hand to her belly it does look like it springs out to her hand. Weird
Click to expand...



YES, I SEE IT NOW!!
I was looking for the "wrong" thing.......an up/down "drop"...........what it actually is is an in/out "pop".

Is there any way, physically this could happen with a real baby bunp'??
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top