Harry and Meghan #25 Hairy, Scary and her magic Mary!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
PennyCrayon said:
I think this is her old house in Canada

www.her.ie

The super-girly house that Meghan Markle left behind in Toronto is honestly better than a palace

Before she moved to the UK in 2017, Meghan Markle lived in a cute Toronto townhouse that she stamped her distinctive style all over.
www.her.ie www.her.ie
Click to expand...
That's tiny! My first house was bigger than that.
That has surprised me. I thought she had an apartment in a posh area but that looks really basic.:unsure:

Just noticed the bleeping union jacks cushions ... :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
bah bah said:
(And I don't want Kate to have any more babies, I don't want fund anymore royal babies, not even to bump H further down the line)
Click to expand...
I think they’ll manage to pay for a few more nappies out of their £2m a year Duchy allowance.

Pixillated said:
What happened with MurkyMeg?
I liked her.
Click to expand...
Yankee Wally said a couple of days ago (on the video where she berates Charles), she was having a few days off.
 
Silly-old-Slapper said:
Call-me-H has been let out of the basement, mustn't have been behaving himself as it looks like she's not let him thrive, have a clean shirt or a wash in weeks poor lad. 😂

https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...ses-young-volunteers-Sports-Heart-London.html
Click to expand...
He's still in that bleeping basement isn't he? Hasn't been let off the leash at all.
FFS just join the moonies, scientologists or mormons. Whatever 🥺
He's got cult fodder stamped all over him.
 
Scotch Mist said:
He's still in that bleeping basement isn't he? Hasn't been let off the leash at all.
FFS just join the moonies, scientologists or mormons. Whatever 🥺
He's got cult fodder stamped all over him.
Click to expand...
His hair looked appalling. Did he move to the US with just one rucksack and one change of clothes?

Just posting this about the bump clutching.
Apparently Lady C is friendly with a royal cousin.
The Harkles don‘t tolerate any criticism; and Harry wanted the Queen and Prince Charles to muzzle the press instead of telling his wife to stop with her ostentatious displays.
(Lost bleeping cause)
D10D1A14-B293-489E-A9BD-EACABF529739.png
910649E6-DC15-4F9C-98D6-E34B0D50439A.png
 
Last edited:
Campagne said:
His hair looked appalling. Did he move to the US with just one rucksack and one change of clothes?

Just posting this about the bump clutching.
Apparently Lady C is friendly with a royal cousin.
The Harkles don‘t tolerate any criticism; and Harry wanted the Queen and Prince Charles to muzzle the press instead of telling his wife to stop with her ostentatious displays.
(Lost bleeping cause)View attachment 141212 qView attachment 141213 q
Click to expand...

Seems to me she did it all the more because she’d been criticised for it.

And I don’t know why it is, because being pregnant is nothing to hide away or be ashamed of, she just irritated the duck out of me all the time. Almost like I knew she was doing it deliberately. She was doing it just to annoy ME 🤬.
 
Campagne said:
His hair looked appalling. Did he move to the US with just one rucksack and one change of clothes?

Just posting this about the bump clutching.
Apparently Lady C is friendly with a royal cousin.
The Harkles don‘t tolerate any criticism; and Harry wanted the Queen and Prince Charles to muzzle the press instead of telling his wife to stop with her ostentatious displays.
(Lost bleeping cause)View attachment 141212 qView attachment 141213 q
Click to expand...
So i take it from that excerpt Lady C has not said anything about the fake bump and surrogacy. It's more about the inappropriate tight clothing and PDA.
When is Meghan's fake pregnancy going to be outed by the mainstream media?
I'm not keen on current trends for exposing pregnancy bumps in tight clothing but I accept that it's the choice of each individual. To me it looks a bit tacky and uncomfortable but every woman has the right to choose how they want to dress in pregnancy. I guess Lady Cs book is all a bit of a letdown.
 
Wightgirl said:
I think it’s the bit where someone close to Harry tries to insinuate that her dad had ‘interfered’ with her in an attempt to influence her opinion.
Click to expand...
What did LCC actually write, do you know? Because that is a very serious allegation.

Regarding the tight clothes, I’ve never been pregnant but would wearing skintight clothes in restrictive material make you feel hot and uncomfortable?

Scotch Mist said:
guess Lady Cs book is all a bit of a letdown.
Click to expand...
I kinda guessed this from the start. Same with the Omid one. If anything actually scandalous was written the lawyers would be all over it like a wet flannel.
 
Still reading the chapter about surrogacy / titles / birth certificate.
Under UK law, the woman who gives birth is the mother ( even if she didn’t provide the egg).
If the surrogate is not married to the bio father; the baby is considered illegitimate, so cannot inherit any titles.
The father registers the birth, so can put any name down as the mother.

Lady C has been very careful not to say Archie was born to a surrogate, but the circumstantial evidence makes it look like he was.

2CFA9E70-B7CF-4589-9D25-D9331B683EFB.png
 
Campagne said:
Still reading the chapter about surrogacy / titles / birth certificate.
Under UK law, the woman who gives birth is the mother ( even if she didn’t provide the egg).
If the surrogate is not married to the bio father; the baby is considered illegitimate, so cannot inherit any titles.
The father registers the birth, so can put any name down as the mother.

Lady C has been very careful not to say Archie was born to a surrogate, but the circumstantial evidence makes it look like he was.

View attachment 141246 q
Click to expand...
Thank you for your updates. Has Lady C ever said it's Meghan's third marriage?
 
Campagne said:
Still reading the chapter about surrogacy / titles / birth certificate.
Under UK law, the woman who gives birth is the mother ( even if she didn’t provide the egg).
If the surrogate is not married to the bio father; the baby is considered illegitimate, so cannot inherit any titles.
The father registers the birth, so can put any name down as the mother.

Lady C has been very careful not to say Archie was born to a surrogate, but the circumstantial evidence makes it look like he was.

View attachment 141246 q
Click to expand...
Well as someone who believes that she did use a surrogate that might explain why they chose not to give Archie a title. It's more likely than assuming they didn't want one. I'm sure Meghan would have wanted a title for her son if she could get one.
Technically he shouldn't even be in the line of succession but it's highly unlikely that he would ever be likely to inherit now.
 
Doodlebug005 said:
Thank you for your updates. Has Lady C ever said it's Meghan's third marriage?
Click to expand...
I can’t remember!

Lady C says a psychologist who knows him says that Harry is codependent on Meghan.
She has a combo of letting him be the « big man » and mothering him, and this ties in with the death of his mother / loss of a Meghan.
People close to a Harry are concerned that he will either have a nervous breakdown or commit suicide if his relationship with her fails.
 
Last edited:
PennyCrayon said:
Seems to me she did it all the more because she’d been criticised for it.

And I don’t know why it is, because being pregnant is nothing to hide away or be ashamed of, she just irritated the duck out of me all the time. Almost like I knew she was doing it deliberately. She was doing it just to annoy ME 🤬.
Click to expand...
It was done in a gloating way as if she were the only woman to ever be pregnant.
 
Campagne said:
Still reading the chapter about surrogacy / titles / birth certificate.
Under UK law, the woman who gives birth is the mother ( even if she didn’t provide the egg).
If the surrogate is not married to the bio father; the baby is considered illegitimate, so cannot inherit any titles.
The father registers the birth, so can put any name down as the mother.

Lady C has been very careful not to say Archie was born to a surrogate, but the circumstantial evidence makes it look like he was.

View attachment 141246 q
Click to expand...
Under the law in England and Wales the most usual course for commissioning parents in surrogacy is a parental order , which can be applied for 6 weeks after birth - 6months after birth. Some case law has allowed parental orders in surrogacy after 6 months and the law on this is under review - Law Commission . So LC is right to say that under our law the women who gives birth is regarded as the legal Mother - even if the child is not biologically hers - policy reasons re. certainty Etc . However the position is usually corrected through a parental order. Easier and quicker than adoption.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top