Harry and Meghan #20 Meghan has lost and it's going to cost

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
acca00 said:
So this was retweeted by Murky Meg. Omid Scobie was on TV talking about the letter Meghan wrote to her father. He explicitly says that the letter was written with the public in mind, that Meghan always knew that the letter would be made public.

Doesn't this expose Meghan completely? In court she wouldn't have a leg to stand on. Omid is Meghan's mouthpiece. I hope the Mail's lawyers know about this.

Click to expand...

Wow that is really blatant! I agree, I really hope the Mail's lawyers have seen this. Can't imagine Meghan would've allowed him to say that if she knew that's what he was gonna come out with? 🤔
 
I had a nitenare about a woman in a green dress...and she opened her mouth and it was like on that TV series V.her mouth hinged right back so she could eat a full frog cos she was an alien reptile who everyone thought was human....🙈and it was on a yacht🤪
Then i received an email asking for money to help a poor American lady who is trying to raise funds for a court case...😎
Been a strange time for we 3.
We are going to twitter later as I could do with something sweet and sugary before lunch ...
KTAW,and take care,there are some very odd ppl out there❤️🤗😘
 
I’m off track here, but my thoughts keep going to poor old Thomas Markle. Regardless of what a wench she is, she’s still his daughter, and he no doubt loves her and would do anything for her. I don’t doubt she occasionally dangles the chance of a reconciliation in front of him like a juicy carrot, only to snatch it back because he’s not followed the plan.

For example, I’ve always thought those pre-wedding suit-fitting pap photos were a clever set up she conned him into. “Daddy, you can’t come to the wedding, but I’m going to send my guys along to photograph a suit fitting so it looks like you tried”, that sort of thing. Which was then cleverly turned against him.

More recently, I can’t help but wonder if the whole letter thing is another stunt gone wrong. “Daddy, let’s publish a letter where I air all my grievances, and then we’ll have the press photograph us meeting to reunite and clear the air”. Except that cunning plan has backfired spectacularly, so she’s once again sh*tting on everyone in an attempt to bail herself out of it.

There was a photo of Thomas Markle’s home in the paper the other day, with the Sparkles’ wedding photo in a silver frame on a shelf. A typical parent thing. The thing is, the photo was one which was released to the media, and the kind of thing a stalkery Stan would display, but that’s what she’s reduced him to - a tiresome fan. Daddy doesn’t fit the narrative, and unlike Doris, he was never given the chance/training to try. The question is whether he’ll have the balls to take the stand against the daughter he so clearly wishes to be reunited with, and spoil potentially the last chance of any sort of reconciliation. Can he ever accept she’s a lost cause?
 
Oatcake said:
I’m off track here, but my thoughts keep going to poor old Thomas Markle. Regardless of what a wench she is, she’s still his daughter, and he no doubt loves her and would do anything for her. I don’t doubt she occasionally dangles the chance of a reconciliation in front of him like a juicy carrot, only to snatch it back because he’s not followed the plan.

For example, I’ve always thought those pre-wedding suit-fitting pap photos were a clever set up she conned him into. “Daddy, you can’t come to the wedding, but I’m going to send my guys along to photograph a suit fitting so it looks like you tried”, that sort of thing. Which was then cleverly turned against him.

More recently, I can’t help but wonder if the whole letter thing is another stunt gone wrong. “Daddy, let’s publish a letter where I air all my grievances, and then we’ll have the press photograph us meeting to reunite and clear the air”. Except that cunning plan has backfired spectacularly, so she’s once again sh*tting on everyone in an attempt to bail herself out of it.

There was a photo of Thomas Markle’s home in the paper the other day, with the Sparkles’ wedding photo in a silver frame on a shelf. A typical parent thing. The thing is, the photo was one which was released to the media, and the kind of thing a stalkery Stan would display, but that’s what she’s reduced him to - a tiresome fan. Daddy doesn’t fit the narrative, and unlike Doris, he was never given the chance/training to try. The question is whether he’ll have the balls to take the stand against the daughter he so clearly wishes to be reunited with, and spoil potentially the last chance of any sort of reconciliation. Can he ever accept she’s a lost cause?
Click to expand...
I really felt for Thomas Markle in that documentary he did earlier that year.
He obviously loves her even now, but is saddened and hurt not angry.
I just cannot believe that a child could use their own parent. Strangers I can see how, although completely unacceptable and ruthless.
But to set up your own father who has only ever loved and supported you is psychopathic.
 
Izzie321 said:
I’ll post this again, as it was right at the end... https://blindgossip.com/her-circle-of-friends-may-not-hold/
Click to expand...

To claim that multiple friends went independently to the press to tell the exact same story, and that she had no idea or involvement in their actions and that every person acted independently, is patently false and ridiculous. HAHA. yeah & my grandma is The Queen of England. this is another one of her lies. just like the one where she lied in front of a tv interview and in front of her husband to be and said she had no idea who Prince Harry was before they met! HAHA

Face with rolling eyes


jh1 said:
I found this article that lists MM's close friends (loose definition of close as they mention Victoria Beckham)

-Serena Williams
-Priyanka Chopra
-Jessica Mulroney
-Misha Nonoo, friend and stylist in Suits
-Abigail Spencer, co-star in Suits
-Daniel Martin, make up artist
-Janina Gavankar, friends for over a decade
-Mathew Anderson

My guess is the friends that blabbed to the magazine are the ones with the lowest profiles as they'd want to be in M's good graces and could be pushed to do it. I think the 5 are:

Jessica Mulroney of course
Priyanka Chopra, she seems desperate to be close to Meghan
Abigail Spencer as a co-star has been mentioned
Janina Gavankar, she looks up to her and even launched a website similar to the Tig.
Misha, I think she's is the one that's scared, she has really high profile clients, and is friends with Beatrice.
Click to expand...

yeah but i still don't believe they just went out of their way to speak to PEOPLE MAG without MM knowing? Bullshit. How did they know about her very private letter to her dad? She had to have spoken about it to these 5 friends lol

Campagne said:
I really felt for Thomas Markle in that documentary he did earlier that year.
He obviously loves her even now, but is saddened and hurt not angry.
I just cannot believe that a child could use their own parent. Strangers I can see how, although completely unacceptable and ruthless.
But to set up your own father who has only ever loved and supported you is psychopathic.
Click to expand...

she is a psychopath
 
Last edited:
antinoos said:
Morning Ladies it was Mrs Aunties Birthday yesterday and Gin might have been taken so be gentle.

I am a little surprised that my old friend Mark Stephens has been spouting excitedly about this matter. Mark, the media's goto Entertainment Lawyer (because, well, he looks like one) has lost his touch recently. He was involved in another, in many ways, comparable horlicks with that British diver described by the lovely Elon Musk as a "pweirdo guy". I dont know what pweirdo Guy got up to in Thailand, but god did he ever get fucked over. Frankly he would have had a good case here - just not, alas, in Elon's Home State. American jurisdictions are so sophisticated.

There was a lesson in that case, now what was it? Ah yes, thats it: dont sue billionairres because you think they'll pay you off, because if there is anything at all legally wrong with your case they will leave you humiliated and penniless; and they dont give a duck what you or anyone else thinks about them, or how much it costs them. Its a matter of survival for their wealth and sometimes they just do it for shits and giggles.

Anyway the bottom line, in what is a delicious Judgment (one for the connoisseur of the slowly inserted eviscerating tool), is that Skidmarks Boys (I guess shes the type who cant stand actual powerful legal women) tried to make the case about the "values" of the Daily Mail. For some bizarre reason, betting the courts would allow themselves (in the narrow, nerdy and specialised fields of Privacy Intrusion and Copyright) to be turned into a second Leverson enquiry. I can imagine the excited scenes in some boardroom full of tit Art and biscuits (with Harry in a corner wondering if theyre at the Accountants again) whilst Megs is sold the dream of becoming the peoples champion against the evil press who killed the woman she has been necro-stalking. Oh dear....very very big mistake.

So the Claim says that the Mail acquired her letter and published parts of it misleadingly in breach of her copyright and privacy, not as a newspaper releasing information in the public interest but BECAUSE: (a) they were engaged in a Campaign to destroy or damage her (for some unspecified reason "Is it becoz I is black?"); (b) in pursuit of which they had deliberately "stirred up" the problem between her and Daddy in the first place; and (c) they had acted throughout dishonestly and maliciously.

The lawyers seem to have forgotten (or more likely they just thought it would be a smash and grab as Skids was at the time beloved by us grateful peasants as a touch of Holywood hooker glamour in our mud stained lives) that its not good enough simply to claim things, you also have to indicate what evidence or legal arguments you might be going to rely on to prove them or what are the defendants supposed to be defending? You cant disprove a general allegation that you're a bit of a bleep - you need specific, teapot throwing bridesmaid humiliating, detail.

The response of Megatrons lawyers to having this pointed out to them before it got to the Application was a small masterpiece of deluded snotty arrogance and clearly got up the Judges nose as he takes Sherbourne to the woodshed. Ruling unappeallably, that in respect of all 3 arguments set out above they had either failed to make out proper legal claims; or failed to indicate just what facts and matters they claimed demonstrated them; and crucially that these mistakes were so fundamental that they couldnt be put right by simply amending the Claim and must be struck out. Elementary legal errors in the Skegness County Court.

Now the Mail still have the basic problem of explaining why publishing Megs's weirdo Magna Carta wasnt actionable of itself. On its face its a private document and no-one else is mad enough to (admit to) having written it BUT without all these aggravating factors its not actually worth that much in damages and anyway it had already been released by the 5 stooges; and crucially Daddy to whom it was sent (and could thus waive any confidentiality or copyright of Megans and have it published) had co-operated with the article and thus it was not a breach of her rights.

The judge has said, as they do after theyve left you bleeding to death, that you can always staunch the wounds (difficult if its your head theyve lopped off) put your case properly and have another go - but the question is can she? You need brains, grit and money not built in kneepads to win against utter bastards.

Have a nice day Im off out with the dog..... what I think she's fucked. Her lawyers wil have known after the hearing (when he gave them such a hard time and said theyd have judgment the legal equivalent of straight away) that they'd gone down with all hands; and in the circumstances their response is feeble. I imagine theyve spent the intervening 7 days preparing the client "No dont get your hopes too high we always said this was a uniquely difficult case.... The judges family owned sugar plantations.... Hows loveable scamp Harry?"

My bet is she will at some suitable point in the news cycle discontinue blaming the evil Brits with our law and slavery and racism - and then lets see who, if anyone, pays up.
Click to expand...
Happy birthday for yesterday! 🎂🥂🍸🍹🤸‍♀️🤸‍♂️
 
Margo_Channing said:
Somebody said that the people magazine interviews with the famous five were conducted by email, and how easy is it to set up a new email?! Meghan sent the emails. They need to check the IP address (this lie that influencers spread explained here) and see where those emails were sent from
Click to expand...
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
etc....

she may well get into even worse trouble if she’s faked their names.
so maybe she isn’t lying saying she didn’t authorise any of her friends..... cos it was the little friends in her head who wrote those emails when she wasn’t looking....
 
Campagne said:
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
etc....

she may well get into even worse trouble if she’s faked their names.
so maybe she isn’t lying saying she didn’t authorise any of her friends..... cos it was the little friends in her head who wrote those emails when she wasn’t looking....
Click to expand...
You don't need a good memory if you tell the truth.

(OH how I wish Judge Judy would do this case)
 
bubbadabut said:
Thanks to all who welcomed me on the last thread. I'm usually around to see what everyone is saying but only get the chance to post when I get a break from my kids!

I just noticed a few people throwing shade on Omid 'Scabie's' post about Princess Charlotte's birthday.


I just did a bit of research on Scabie. Apparently he used to work for Heat magazine and is 'gender neutral' 🤦‍♀️
Click to expand...

He definitely looks it, I did wonder when I first saw his pic 😄
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top