Harry and Meghan #18 We're really kind, please hire us, as Harry said there is no virus.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Norbs said:
If you go to the ‘similar articles’ or whatever it’s called link, it’s about Hough and hubby. BG’s links are usually a big clue as to who the blind is about.
Click to expand...

I agree with you. Blind Gossip also include clues in their writing:
Who is leading - Leading - Dancing with the stars

And BG have never suggested their marriage is in trouble. Or that she had pulled away when she started dating him, quite the opposite with her.

Most of the blind fits as Harry is Meghan's puppy dog but I don't think this is about them.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This makes me 😂 so much. Meghan has chosen Omid Scobie to write her hagiography. Don’t think she realises he’s an ex-tabloid reporter who made his living flogging stories to the very papers she hates, including the Mail on Sunday! Whoops. <a href="https://tattle.life/threads/19920/">https://tattle.life/threads/19920/</a></p>&mdash; Dan Wootton (@danwootton) <a href="">April 26, 2020</a></blockquote>< script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Campagne said:
Trying to steal the Thunder from Charlotte as it’s her birthday first.
Heres Kate’s pictures of her children

www.hellomagazine.com

Princess Kate and Prince William's sweetest family photos

The Princess of Wales is a keen photographer!
www.hellomagazine.com www.hellomagazine.com


What exactly did they do to be asked to leave?
i read somewhere it was something about overshadowing Charles.
The closing ranks and ejecting them was priceless to watch
Click to expand...
What tickled me was Migraine heading toward the cars and having to be herded away by an usher and Ginger and do the walk(or wobble in her case) of shame all the way back to the house.
I like to think Charles said "Why the duck is cuntface taking over my event? You're not getting a ride in my car, , just get the duck back to the house and sit on the naughty step for three hours you pair of cunts!I'll deal with you later."

While Camilla air kisses bleep face and says "why the feck are you wearing a soup plate on your head, eejit."
 
I expected that the witch would write a' tell all poor me I'm a victim' type book at some point in the future but I never expected that she was vile enough to start work on it while she was still living here and being funded by us to the tune of millions. 😡

I absolutely detest her now and am shocked that Harry would allow her to go ahead with it because we know that she will be writing nasty things about his family (the family she never had).🤮

I would certainly never part with a penny to read anything endorsed by that scumbag grifter. Unless of course parts are posted on here for our amusement.😁

If they do go ahead and publish this book their goose is truly cooked and the royal family will have to cut them off without any more money.
 
magball said:
I didn't have to subscribe either but here it is:


Meghan the narcissist gets her day in court, but she’s too blind to see she’s already lost

Camilla Long

Sunday April 26 2020, 12.01am, The Sunday Times

The trial of the decade kicked off on Friday morning, with much excited fiddling online — a pre-trial hearing conducted, “trickily”, on Microsoft Teams. In one window, the duchess’s little Italian waiter QC appeared, with a plume of glossy turkey hair. In another, there was the silent, clipped, gravedigger QC for the defence, representing The Mail on Sunday and its case for printing Thomas Markle’s letter. Both were in rooms that had been blurred out, while the purring judge — a man not unlike Alan Rickman — sat in a normal Harry Potter panelled courtroom.

Along with 80 or so other journalists, I watched the whole thing from start to finish. It felt vast and important, like Leveson part two. At one point, it lookedless like a trial of the matter at hand and more like a trial of the press in general. If Prince Harry has his way, it will be a monstrous, all-consuming, neverending rapture: a terrible reckoning, a Book of Revelation for the people he hates. For Meghan it will involve an end-times level of self-promotion and publicity. Guess what? She will take the stand. It is their dream circus.

Be in no doubt: this is a circus. It seemed astonishing to me that these skilled and pre-eminent men, with 100 years of experience between them, should waste any time discussing a story of such effervescing Marie Antoinettish frippery and thin-skinned triviality. There was talk of “post-Naomi Campbell jurisprudence” and a comic moment when they stopped to consider whether Meghan’s “favourite snack”, avocados, fuelled “human rights abuses, drought and murder”. That was before we got to the 75 pages of articles that had displeased the couple. First impression: neither the duchess nor Harry can take criticism.

Second impression: for someone who doesn’t like to talk about her private life, the duchess sure does want to talk about it. Before this trial, we knew little about her relationship with her grim Honey Bear father; now there’s little we don’t. The hearing made reference to a whole 33 further pages of mostly personal content she made available 10 days ago, including texts to her father from Meghan and Harry before their wedding.

The messages add absolutely nothing. In one, she appears concerned for her father’s “health and safety”. In another, she seems most interested in getting “security” to the hospital where he’s just had heart surgery, presumably to stop him talking to the press. So why release them? Perhaps to provide a mirage of openness, give the impression she’s happy to lay it all out when she isn’t. If anything, the couple come across as unhealthily obsessed with the press and their own image.

But then, the duchess is someone who thinks she can win at anything; be the centre of all attention; have the moral upper hand in any dispute. Her own ego blinds her; it even blinds the people working for her, like her poor QC struggling to keep up with the vastness of her pompous submissions. I am no fan of the royal family, and in many ways I’d hoped she would expose them as the pale, stale charisma vacuums they are, but at least they have the humility to know when to stop, instead of throwing themselves into this extraordinary trial and its ramifications — the hundreds of pages of overshare, plus the added negative publicity that will never end.

Who wins is irrelevant — in many ways she has already lost. There will be a day’s headlines if she prevails after two, three, even four weeks of lashing stories about her destructive ambition and unedifying obsession with her image. Meanwhile she is reducing the pair of them to supermarket magazine fodder, telling Harry he’s getting better, when he is in fact getting worse. She will brush the whole trial aside as yet another injustice, whatever happens: “See what they made me do,” she will say, by way of explaining the roomfuls of dirty linen about to be laundered. It’s as mad as a box of prancing kippers.

By the end of it, Harry will secretly wish to go back to the relative anonymity of being a royal, living in peace at Frogmore, able to fully disappear once he’s clocked out of the day’s work, just like a normal person would. Royals are the most anonymous celebs in the world — Prince William, for example, lives in obscurity. We don’t know where he buys his clothes, gets his food, even where he goes on holiday. He had a whole job and none of us knew anything about it. As he appeared outside his house on Thursday to clap the NHS, I realised I didn’t even know whether he would like his own front door. All those riches, and all that power and no effort — it is the dream, and Harry is probably already missing it.
Click to expand...

That is awesome.

Meagain to take the stand...that will fall straight into the tabloid’s hands. She is probably being coached on it right now, because she sure isn’t a good enough actress.

THREAD Suggestion
Meghan to take the stand, winning an oscar for the lousiest actress in the land
 
This is a video of them at an event to mark Charles investiture as Prince of Wales.
Theres another video that I can't find which shows more detail, but basically Migraine and Ginger are waiting by the doorway and as the Royals approach she starts forward to join the first ones ... Charles and the Queen. As is Royal etiquette the Queen is always first, then Chas n Cam, then Kate and Wills, but fuckface cannot seem to get that into her thick skull. Anyway she starts forward grinning like a chimp and Chas turns and says something to her which caused the grin to freeze and she looked puzzled and turned to Ginger ... but he was aleady being spoken to by an usher and ignored her. Then they laughed awkwardly and were herded across the back of the room away from the 5 senior royals and had to wait at the exit doors and allow the 5 royals to exit first.
Ginger should have known this routine, what the duck is wrong with him that he expected his wife could walk in front of Kate and Wills and Camilla at a formal event with press in attendance?

From about 38 seconds in.



https://videos.12ft.io/https://www....430973268/960x540_MP4_4089912943430973268.mp4
 
It will be very interesting reading if they did disrespect PC,cos he's giving them millions,hand over fist and what does he get in return...not even a thanks,kiss my arse,nowt as we say in Yorkshire.
Must have the patience of a bloody saint.i mean,what could they say if he stopped the money,they wouldn't have a keg to stand on cos no one would be bothered if they went bankrupt.the RF wouldn't be blamed by the majority of the world,only the sugars would spontaneously combust and that would be a small loss,or a bonus depending on how you look at it😂😂
 
Momof5intheStates said:
I am not in an appropriate position to look at the moment, because the 8 yr old angel child (😈 lies I tell you!! She's spoiled rotten) is snuggled up on my lap watching........animé 😩😩😩
Click to expand...
Youve
magball said:
I didn't have to subscribe either but here it is:


Meghan the narcissist gets her day in court, but she’s too blind to see she’s already lost

Camilla Long

Sunday April 26 2020, 12.01am, The Sunday Times

The trial of the decade kicked off on Friday morning, with much excited fiddling online — a pre-trial hearing conducted, “trickily”, on Microsoft Teams. In one window, the duchess’s little Italian waiter QC appeared, with a plume of glossy turkey hair. In another, there was the silent, clipped, gravedigger QC for the defence, representing The Mail on Sunday and its case for printing Thomas Markle’s letter. Both were in rooms that had been blurred out, while the purring judge — a man not unlike Alan Rickman — sat in a normal Harry Potter panelled courtroom.

Along with 80 or so other journalists, I watched the whole thing from start to finish. It felt vast and important, like Leveson part two. At one point, it lookedless like a trial of the matter at hand and more like a trial of the press in general. If Prince Harry has his way, it will be a monstrous, all-consuming, neverending rapture: a terrible reckoning, a Book of Revelation for the people he hates. For Meghan it will involve an end-times level of self-promotion and publicity. Guess what? She will take the stand. It is their dream circus.

Be in no doubt: this is a circus. It seemed astonishing to me that these skilled and pre-eminent men, with 100 years of experience between them, should waste any time discussing a story of such effervescing Marie Antoinettish frippery and thin-skinned triviality. There was talk of “post-Naomi Campbell jurisprudence” and a comic moment when they stopped to consider whether Meghan’s “favourite snack”, avocados, fuelled “human rights abuses, drought and murder”. That was before we got to the 75 pages of articles that had displeased the couple. First impression: neither the duchess nor Harry can take criticism.

Second impression: for someone who doesn’t like to talk about her private life, the duchess sure does want to talk about it. Before this trial, we knew little about her relationship with her grim Honey Bear father; now there’s little we don’t. The hearing made reference to a whole 33 further pages of mostly personal content she made available 10 days ago, including texts to her father from Meghan and Harry before their wedding.

The messages add absolutely nothing. In one, she appears concerned for her father’s “health and safety”. In another, she seems most interested in getting “security” to the hospital where he’s just had heart surgery, presumably to stop him talking to the press. So why release them? Perhaps to provide a mirage of openness, give the impression she’s happy to lay it all out when she isn’t. If anything, the couple come across as unhealthily obsessed with the press and their own image.

But then, the duchess is someone who thinks she can win at anything; be the centre of all attention; have the moral upper hand in any dispute. Her own ego blinds her; it even blinds the people working for her, like her poor QC struggling to keep up with the vastness of her pompous submissions. I am no fan of the royal family, and in many ways I’d hoped she would expose them as the pale, stale charisma vacuums they are, but at least they have the humility to know when to stop, instead of throwing themselves into this extraordinary trial and its ramifications — the hundreds of pages of overshare, plus the added negative publicity that will never end.

Who wins is irrelevant — in many ways she has already lost. There will be a day’s headlines if she prevails after two, three, even four weeks of lashing stories about her destructive ambition and unedifying obsession with her image. Meanwhile she is reducing the pair of them to supermarket magazine fodder, telling Harry he’s getting better, when he is in fact getting worse. She will brush the whole trial aside as yet another injustice, whatever happens: “See what they made me do,” she will say, by way of explaining the roomfuls of dirty linen about to be laundered. It’s as mad as a box of prancing kippers.

By the end of it, Harry will secretly wish to go back to the relative anonymity of being a royal, living in peace at Frogmore, able to fully disappear once he’s clocked out of the day’s work, just like a normal person would. Royals are the most anonymous celebs in the world — Prince William, for example, lives in obscurity. We don’t know where he buys his clothes, gets his food, even where he goes on holiday. He had a whole job and none of us knew anything about it. As he appeared outside his house on Thursday to clap the NHS, I realised I didn’t even know whether he would like his own front door. All those riches, and all that power and no effort — it is the dream, and Harry is probably already missing it.
Click to expand...
Read this earlier today in the paper....spot on..(but then I'm a fan of this journo's acerbic tongue )...especially the bit about William. The Harkles tried to control the narrative and it bit them on the bum. They could easily have lived a quiet, private life, but it's clear that's not what they wanted. Most people had put her relationship with her father to the back of their minds but this court case will put her poor treatment of him back in the spotlight at a time when their ratings are low. I can't see how she's going to turn it round with her five imaginary friends either.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top