Harry and Meghan #117 Basically, she's unhinged

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
the musician said:
Has anyone seen this crap? How dumb do you have to be to believe that they're trying to protect their daughter's name from exploitation? If anything, HW is the one exploiting her children!
www.harpersbazaar.com

How Prince Harry & Meghan Markle Are Protecting Baby Lili's Name from Exploitation

The couple took a preventive step to protect their newborn daughter's identity ahead of her birth.
www.harpersbazaar.com www.harpersbazaar.com
Click to expand...

Poor Lillibet Oprah Diana she must be thinking what have I done to deserve this loon as a mother and this weasel as a father, it won’t be long till she’s being used as a weapon just like Archie was with the race fiasco.
 
the musician said:
Has anyone seen this crap? How dumb do you have to be to believe that they're trying to protect their daughter's name from exploitation? If anything, HW is the one exploiting her children!
www.harpersbazaar.com

How Prince Harry & Meghan Markle Are Protecting Baby Lili's Name from Exploitation

The couple took a preventive step to protect their newborn daughter's identity ahead of her birth.
www.harpersbazaar.com www.harpersbazaar.com
Click to expand...

Aye, of course, they are. Full o' tricks.

I'm happy to see the criticisms reached their foul ears and this feeble attempt at a response. To me, it shows guilt.

Not really enjoying their maternity leave, are they? Jolly good!
 
Happy birthday, Cassandra! 🎂 🎉 Hope you have a lovely day. Don’t worry, we won’t give you the birthday bump-bumps 😉

Kate looks amazing in those pics, wish I could pull off coral! I also love how almost every word of the article is dripping with shade. They know Smegma is reading and seething at the descriptions of Kate’s natural beauty and fab rapport with the children.
 
@the musician @StrawberrySeed Could one of you do this article too please?

www.thetimes.co.uk

Meghan Markle ‘posted rings back’ when marriage ended

Meghan Markle’s first marriage ended so abruptly that she posted her wedding and engagement rings back to her former husband, according to a new biography (David Brown writes).Ms Markle, 36, who will marry Prince Harry next month, was married to Trevor Engelson, a Hollywood producer, for less tha
www.thetimes.co.uk www.thetimes.co.uk
 
Last edited:
Churchill's Ghost said:
It is hard to keep track!

There have been reports that she was nasty/abusive towards:

1) Palace staff
2) Australia staff
3) Tyler Perry staff
4) Givenchy staff
5) Gospel choir
6) Netflix staff (this came from a post from someone whose mother is high up there)
Click to expand...


That's great thanks @Churchill's Ghost. I hereby appoint you Tattlers Executive Secretary on this matter, and you should prepare daily reports before 5am every morning, in keeping with Megzys demands.

Good luck my lovely.

@Cassandra333 hope you're having a fab birthday xx 🍷🎉🥳🥳🎂💝💖
 
Cassandra333 said:
Good Morning Tattlers :)
Saw this comment on the Arrse forum and thought it worth posting.
"Anyone else think Ms Markle has read all about veteran suicide and is wondering why it's taking so long and what more she has to do? " :LOL:
Also it's my birthday today :D I am now older and delighted to be so. Decades ago, my beloved Mother in Law (RIP) told me it was great to get older because you stopped caring what other people thought. She was dead right too. There's something very liberating about getting old.
Click to expand...

Happy Birthday🎂
 
Might & power said:
Sorry, think I just posted a fangirl page, was looking for the one about the secret child!
Click to expand...
This is about the 'annulment"
www.quora.com

Why did Meghan Markle annul her first marriage with Joe Giuliano? Why not just divorce him?

Answer (1 of 57): Thanks for your question. There’s actually a very simple answer: she could not divorce him because they were never married. It is for this same reason that she didn’t annul her marriage to him either, because you can’t annul a marriage that doesn’t exist. There’s a few other pr...
www.quora.com www.quora.com
 
JAR21 said:
@themusician @StrawberrySeed Could one of you do this article too please?

www.thetimes.co.uk

Meghan Markle ‘posted rings back’ when marriage ended

Meghan Markle’s first marriage ended so abruptly that she posted her wedding and engagement rings back to her former husband, according to a new biography (David Brown writes).Ms Markle, 36, who will marry Prince Harry next month, was married to Trevor Engelson, a Hollywood producer, for less tha
www.thetimes.co.uk www.thetimes.co.uk
Click to expand...
Sure, here it is
 
SaffaQueen said:
Was watching the press review on GB news last night - Carol Malone suggested that her "Union Jackass" of the day was Harry for the admission that the OW interview was done out of spite due to his honorary titles being stripped.
Some young journalist protested - "but, But, Harry fought in afghanistan, he earned them". Honorary titles? And with him not in the country...?
His "heroic military service" is his go to card, just like Smeg's race card.
Click to expand...

:oops: I have no words for just how bleeping stupid you have to be to spout such garbage!
 
the musician said:
I never knew that Robert Lacey was friends with Jamal Khashoggi. Could this also be why he's changed his tune (as well as possibly realising he was backing the wrong horse)?
Click to expand...


Could the publisher/editor have told him that if he wants more copies of his book printed he'll have to change bits and try and disguise the changes as an "update" hoping nobody notices?
(Cos the editor has noticed the change of public opinion)
 
Last edited:
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top