Harry and Meghan #113 threatening another lawsuit, the media needs to put them on mute

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Scotch Mist said:
That's well frightening.... Smeggy should run now. They forgot to take away the hair with the ageing too! He's going to be pretty bald soon.
Click to expand...
H didn't look well in that Invictus video, he looked dead behind the eyes and didn't smile!! (how these Sugars think he is thriving is beyond me) he had no passion and looked like he was depressed. Honestly it is the worst i have seen him look in my opinion
 
Lollydyerx said:
H didn't look well in that Invictus video, he looked dead behind the eyes and didn't smile!! (how these Sugars think he is thriving is beyond me) he had no passion and looked like he was depressed. Honestly it is the worst i have seen him look in my opinion
Click to expand...

Yes he does look awful but, sorry zero sympathy from me quite honestly if his bad mouthing the family and the UK is getting to him he has only himself to blame and perhaps he should dry up and blow away.

He is a Cupid stunt and I dislike him intensely alongside hi s old doxy,and a kick up the jacksey is well overdue for this pair.
 
Xales said:
So they buy her book give them away to poor suckers and then write it off as a tax/charitable donation while the number of copies sold goes up?

Will cost her next to nothing. Nice scam.
Click to expand...
Since this is obviously a vanity printing (not a title acquired by Penguin Random House but one the author paid PRHto print) the gruesome twosome have already paid for the books upfront. Again, there is nothing in the trades about an advance paid or RH acquiring the book. Zip zero zilch. Also absolutely nothing about the book on Random House’s Twitter, where they are pushing Fathers Day books for adults and children. It’s not on their “new this week” thread either. if they had paid an advance, PRH would be promoting.

Plus, Nothing about the book outside of the illustrator meets professional standards.
 
Lollydyerx said:
H didn't look well in that Invictus video, he looked dead behind the eyes and didn't smile!! (how these Sugars think he is thriving is beyond me) he had no passion and looked like he was depressed. Honestly it is the worst i have seen him look in my opinion
Click to expand...
His bleeping horrible awful ferret teeth and eyes. Ewww (shivers).
Say what you want but having to look at that rodent halfwit on a regular basis might be Ms well-deserved purgatory.
Honestly, get thee to a bleeping dentist before your colombian marching powder erodes those twiggy stubs into nothingness.
He makes Austin Powers look like the Colgate Kid
 
ResidentMerkin said:
His bleeping horrible awful ferret teeth and eyes. Ewww (shivers).
Say what you want but having to look at that rodent halfwit on a regular basis might be Ms well-deserved purgatory.
Honestly, get thee to a bleeping dentist before your colombian marching powder erodes those twiggy stubs into nothingness.
He makes Austin Powers look like the Colgate Kid
Click to expand...

His eyes have always been WAY too close together, gives him an untrustworthy look imo.
 
ResidentMerkin said:
His bleeping horrible awful ferret teeth and eyes. Ewww (shivers).
Say what you want but having to look at that rodent halfwit on a regular basis might be Ms well-deserved purgatory.
Honestly, get thee to a bleeping dentist before your colombian marching powder erodes those twiggy stubs into nothingness.
He makes Austin Powers look like the Colgate Kid
Click to expand...
His eyes look dilated (again - or rather, as usual). Dark room or too much ganja :-)?
 
Churchill's Ghost said:
Since this is obviously a vanity printing (not a title acquired by Penguin Random House but one the author paid PRHto print) the gruesome twosome have already paid for the books upfront. Again, there is nothing in the trades about an advance paid or RH acquiring the book. Zip zero zilch. Also absolutely nothing about the book on Random House’s Twitter, where they are pushing Fathers Day books for adults and children. It’s not on their “new this week” thread either. if they had paid an advance, PRH would be promoting.

Plus, Nothing about the book outside of the illustrator meets professional standards.
Click to expand...
I read an article about Waterstones not being able to receive sufficient books because of their agreement with PRH so they have said they won't be doing a display of them in any of their branches.

Azalea said:
His eyes look dilated (again - or rather, as usual). Dark room or too much ganja :)?
Click to expand...
He's definitely a puffer. 🚬 🐡
 
Scotch Mist said:
What have the BBC said about this threat of being sued? Have they backed down? Frankly the BBC are desperate to be as woke as possible these days.

If the Harkles sue the BBC then they are effectively taking money from the British people who are paying to fund the BBC through the bloody licence fee.

Obviously this is also in Hazno's warped little mind about the Diana interview with Martin Bashir.
Click to expand...
İn an ideal world they would reconsider using Lilibet and replace with Lili, cancel lilibetdiana.com domains, and let TQ grieve without the grief they give her. They really need to forego all titles, face up to their commoner status and run with it. Nobody wants to see them in UK for anything royal-statue unveiling, jubilee, trooping, remembrance. How can they possibly be happy with their unending obsession for the royalty they left behind. They cheapen and tarnish everything they touch.
 
Felix45 said:
Pump-pump?

View attachment 611286 q
Felix45 said:
Pump-pump?
Click to expand...


The boy" actually makes my skin crawl, no not the kiddie, the way she has addressed him... My dad had a witch of a sister and when she talked about her son she never said his name, "the boy said" " the boy did" etc ... Very very weird , impersonal like you would mention "the shoe" " the dog" "the window" etc .... my parents found it very disturbing too.... fyi "the boy" grew into a real weirdo....won't go there 😱
Click to expand...
 
Rockin' Robin said:
Probably not going to be a popular opinion, but I have always suspected that Harry is not Prince Charles's son. Harry may have discovered the truth, within the last 5 years. His recent behaviour has been a reaction to this discovery.
The real reason the Royal Family, have not retaliated against this behaviour, is because of the secrets (even more of them) that Harry might reveal.
I'll leave through the back door shall I?
Click to expand...

But even if so...
Diana is dead. We aren't insulting her virtue by telling the truth. And the royal family have had centuries of dealing with the fallout from affairs and bedhopping. As have many other non-royal families around the world.
Nothing new to see here.

More painful for harry but he still has to man up and grow a new pair like many others in the same situation.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top