Yeh everyone who was uncomfortable with his tactics wanted pensioners like icicles of a winter. Everything is such a simple dichotomy to some people. I actually do think it's the 1st time she's been challenged. I've been aware of the account for years, all I've ever seen is positivity, signal boosts and praise for 'our nic'. The rage when questioned is exactly like the behaviour of Monroe's flying monkeys, most of whom still can't admit they were wrong now she's throughly discredited. A tiny corner of the internet talking amongst ourselves about our reasonable doubts isn't trolling.
Halton Christmas Toy Appeal
- Thread starter Foxvint
- Start date
1
markcorriganscrisps
VIP Member
The thing is, for these folk defending her, there's an element of not wanting to have been duped or, for some of the less ego driven ones, not wanting to feel like someone doing 'good' really isn't. I think that's behind a lot of the indignation.
Witchfinder Sargeant
VIP Member
People don't like to think they've been conned, and will defend their decisions, in this case, their decision to support someone without doing even the most cursory due diligence.
The minute a potential donor realised money was going to a personal PayPal or bank account, they should have walked away.
She's still locked so no one can see her 'important statement'. I'm no troll, i have never and will never tweet @ the subject of any thread i post on nor would i speculate on twitter. I'm sure she's decided to believe we're all posh brewstied tories trying to snatch the ham butties out of kids mouths when all I actually am is an ordinary scouser with a crappy call centre job thinking something looks well shady and I'll take no lectures from a dubious widnes wool trying to dictate what I'm allowed to talk about on a website.
Attachments
Calm your tits Mother Theresa. No-one hates you. We don't know you. We dislike the tactics of your account and have reasonable doubts. The hyperbole is off the charts.
VeniVidiVicki
VIP Member
This is a lie. You have to register if you’ve set up a charity and your donations are over £5000/pa.
Set up a charity
To start a charity you need trustees, to choose a business structure, decide suitable charitable purposes and you may have to register with the Charity Commission
Her donations are definitely over that. The little one near me which has a much smaller SM presence and no big corporate donors makes that.
The only reason she hasn’t registered as a charity or CIC is to avoid financial scrutiny.
Jelly Bean
VIP Member
I don't understand this urgent appeal to help the mother she visited today. Surely the 'charity' has enough money now to help her out to buy food? Otherwise what is the point of it?
So she visited the mum, told her she couldn't help straight away but would put out an appeal?
The food donations seem to often come from local shops. You'd think a pic would go up to thank/promote them/prove it.
lc04050607
Chatty Member
I don’t believe for a second that the council have essentially advised her to carry on handling donated money with no official registration. I’ve had a Google and I can’t find a clear answer as to what a “constitutional group” even is. It’s definitely not a “status”
Opinion and speculation is not hatred and lies. All that bristling guns blazing self righteousness just makes it sound shadier.
I'd love to know what the correct route is for reporting personal opinion to the authorities cos I'd like to have Mr Vint investigated for thinking cricket is good. Never knew it was an option.
I'd love to know what the correct route is for reporting personal opinion to the authorities cos I'd like to have Mr Vint investigated for thinking cricket is good. Never knew it was an option.
Attachments
Jelly Bean
VIP Member
Oh dear. For some reason these sort of denials make it all worse 
It's the indignance that anyone is even allowed to query how things are run. Any question is trolling and bullying. Just so bloody dodgy.
It's the indignance that anyone is even allowed to query how things are run. Any question is trolling and bullying. Just so bloody dodgy.
markcorriganscrisps
VIP Member
There hasn't been any hatred or lies, just questions. I'm also sure slander is verbal and not written/online?
I would also like to know where the correct authorty is for reporting the opinion that space programmes are interesting, as I feel that mrcrispy is odds on for an at least four year stretch.
Jelly Bean
VIP Member
And the thing is being asked questions is doing these people a favour.
It was always going to happen at some point. If daft Depher had taken on board and addressed the legitimate concerns years ago he wouldn't be in this pickle now.
Instead they dig their heels in and bat away any robust questioning as bullying. Which makes people more suspicious.
She's took it incredibly personally cos she makes it personal with the dickensian details and because it does double duty as her personal account. This thread is not 'incouraging' pile ons, I hate that aspect of social media. If some ppl who read here have questioned her on twitter that's on them. Tattle membership has been closed for donkeys. It's 2 separate things. I doubt all the small businesses that are labours of love for their founders throw their toys out the pram and scream about their good intentions at health inspectors or accountants doing their thing, she needs to get a grip.
---
Thousands of online charities and how many end up with a tattle thread? If everything goes straight in your personal account, if you're happy to post unethical exploitative details like a child being called a woman and urged to unalive herself, if the account is also your platform for posting your batshit safeguarding nightmare views about toddlers being given cbd, if your unqualified arse is presenting itself at vulnerable crisis points like women fleeing DV (does she know a woman leaving is the catalyst for the highest risk point of murder by the perp and that a photo of hotel hall carpet and the knowledge that she's located in an area accessible to Nicolas services could be very useful to an abuser trying to hunt down what he perceives as his lost property), why is it outrageous that ppl have questions? It's outrageous she's been unchallenged so long.
Last edited:
Quoting myself like a dick to say I *think* the post in question was about fleeing DV but it could've just been about a mum being homeless and accommodated in a hotel. Can't go an check with her being locked again. Apologies to Nicola if I'm wrong but there was definitely a hotel carpet photo. I might be mistaken about the DV bit but too late to edit my post. The point still stands that she's unqualified for being involved in complex social crisis like addiction and homelessness. I apologise again if there was no mention of DV in the post in question.
Last edited:
I always think the tweeters who act with extreme horror at the suggestion that there's no proof someone with a private account is acting with 100% integrity are the same ppl who'd have been chipping in to buy that blag Russian 'heiress' Anna a suite at the Ritz-Carlton when she'd forgotten her AmEx.