Grace Beverley #25 It’s a hard fall from Grace

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
iz157 said:
It gets so much worse when she shows the trousers 😭😭 why did she leave the house like this
View attachment 2897342 q
Click to expand...
This outfit was crying for some skinny jeans!! I know the trend is over, but everything else about the outfit (hair, top, shoes) says sleek, but then the jeans completely ruin the vibe.

I've heard a general rule for creating outfits is baggy on top/tight on bottom or baggy on bottom/tight on top, but this is clearly an exception!
 
hereforthefood said:
This outfit was crying for some skinny jeans!! I know the trend is over, but everything else about the outfit (hair, top, shoes) says sleek, but then the jeans completely ruin the vibe.

I've heard a general rule for creating outfits is baggy on top/tight on bottom or baggy on bottom/tight on top, but this is clearly an exception!
Click to expand...

I don’t even think it’s the fact the jeans are baggy, it’s the weird balloon shape. They look like the shape of those inflatable sumo suits.
 
I’m ngl I tried the bodysuit n it was good but why so she always producing nee collections I don’t get it. I thought she was building a niche brand
 
fwooper said:
Really not the flex she thinks it is. The only reason she can do this not because of her success as a businesswoman but because she’s a white woman with generational wealth; she’s generally a non threatening person to the Tory government. She’s an upper middle class woman that advocates for surface-level equality but glosses over economic and class struggles - like most Tories.

The thing is, she could actually use that privilege to advocate for people who need it but instead she’s going to use this time to advocate for women to become billionaires more easily. She’s not doing any good work here; the Tories will love her for wanting to encourage more people getting super rich.
Click to expand...


Just to come back to this - I'm pretty sure this is the meeting she's referring to with Bim Afolami from Treasury and she is definitely not there...

Why post about something that's so easily disprovable?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240429-155708~2.png
    Screenshot_20240429-155708~2.png
    164.7 KB · Views: 41
No.Name.Nancy said:
Just to come back to this - I'm pretty sure this is the meeting she's referring to with Bim Afolami from Treasury and she is definitely not there...

Why post about something that's so easily disprovable?
Click to expand...
It was a different day - she ostensibly met him the following day according to her screengrab of the meeting (25th April). The Treasury might be doing some consultation on inclusion within investing, hence the meetings with her and these people. Like others have said, even if it was just her meeting him, it’s not a massive flex, particularly if they move in similar (posho) circles. If you get them to change policy, yeah you can flex a little, but just a meeting isn’t a huge deal. MPs literally spend their lives meeting people in either their constituency, or who have relevant interests to their ministerial briefs and/or APPGs/committees they’re involved in.
 
thisisntreal said:
It was a different day - she ostensibly met him the following day according to her screengrab of the meeting (25th April). The Treasury might be doing some consultation on inclusion within investing, hence the meetings with her and these people. Like others have said, even if it was just her meeting him, it’s not a massive flex, particularly if they move in similar (posho) circles. If you get them to change policy, yeah you can flex a little, but just a meeting isn’t a huge deal. MPs literally spend their lives meeting people in either their constituency, or who have relevant interests to their ministerial briefs and/or APPGs/committees they’re involved in.
Click to expand...
As you say, these "meetings" are sp ten a penny they often mean nothing
 
I know this is retreading old ground because she posts the same shite every day but god these are annoying. Recording a voice over for 15 mins is not a “block”, it’s one point on a to do list.

is she really expecting us to believe she does 30 mins of approvals at 5 and then teleports to her lash appointment at 5:30 lmao please, how dumb does she think people are
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2543.jpeg
    IMG_2543.jpeg
    56.2 KB · Views: 20
influencersmakemewannadie said:
I know this is retreading old ground because she posts the same shite every day but god these are annoying. Recording a voice over for 15 mins is not a “block”, it’s one point on a to do list.

is she really expecting us to believe she does 30 mins of approvals at 5 and then teleports to her lash appointment at 5:30 lmao please, how dumb does she think people are
Click to expand...
Also how is she fitting an ab workout and presumably shower/hair/makeup/getting dressed/breakfast (and a commute to the office or was she wfh?) into 45 minutes?
 
mindlessness said:
Also how is she fitting an ab workout and presumably shower/hair/makeup/getting dressed/breakfast (and a commute to the office or was she wfh?) into 45 minutes?
Click to expand...

There is 100% a new shreddy challenge coming because this girl hasn’t talked about/ shown working out in weeks and now it’s all- look how easy I plan workouts into my day

She’s so boring
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top