Freddy My Love #9 will take any freebies going, as long as you like short and white Flossy is flowing

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Nothing screams elegant like off-centre buttons with pulling, wrinkled material around it. Oh-kay.
---
Why is she so freaking dumb? Hi guys! I've been to the chemist who are actual experts in their field who have told me to take this, but I think I'll just ask random people on the internet instead. Well here you go Freddy, I'm a random person on the internet, AND I've been to a chemist and I have the same thing,


get over yourself, you're not special.
 
More like cheap looking material .....

1716411036501.png
 
This one looks scratchy :LOL: She's already put out ugly unwearable pieces...why not go with a more casual collection this time? 🥴

View attachment 2953409 q
I give that vanity project 6-9 months before it folds. There are only so much fashion and brand plagiarism it can do. The products look awful on those who buy them. Sorry but it’s true. The only person it looks reasonably good on is Freddy. She even admitted she bases the look, cut and design on her pear shape figure although she insists hourglass. Also there is the concerns of how it is being manufactured. Freddy has never addressed it and that is concerning. Who are producing the fabrics, who are sewing the dresses is it sweatshops, are they being paid and treated ethically? Also I wonder how long it will be before she gets sued by the Bridgerton lot for using their brand for her own selfish means. Remember they got their own back which had Freddy’s nose out of joint by using her content for their trailer. Not just them but Chanel and Dior are being exploited by her too for her advertisements I doubt she got their permission
 
The cheap polyester outfits are gross. She can do better.
No she can’t. If she could she would have done it by now instead of ripping off other designers. The irony is that women in the era she is trying to emulate never wore things like that leisurely, only at formal events. Jackie O who popularised the pillbox hat never went out shopping wearing it. Women of that era wore a lot of rayon, polyester and new fabrics that were coming out. They were experimental and at times risqué. For those with money, they did not go out head to toe in bouclé tweed and formal hats unless it was to a fashion show, a formal event or to a work dinner to please the husband’s boss and their wife. Freddy has a very skewered vision of what fashion realistically was like back then. Postwar women did not want to dress like their mothers and grandmothers. Whereby they had a few dresses, two suits and a few hats and bags and court shoes. That is why Biba was created. I think the only woman that dresses remotely close to how Freddy thinks women did then was Carroll Petrie, the American socialite who wore pastel Chanel suits everyday and haute couture only but she was an elderly woman who was a philanthropist. It was appropriate wear. Freddy is not a socialite or a philanthropist but a nearly 30 year old woman who lives in pure fantasy land and flogs overpriced, scratchy looking knockoffs for £150 a time with no reference to any ethical work practices regarding who is making those products. A total waste of time, opportunity and zero education on the products she is insisting others wear and that it is relevant and wearable in 2024 and not look like a caricature (which she does and all those others who pose in their dresses afterwards, most of them could do with going to the gym before taking selfies) those dresses remember are made for Freddy’s body she even said it herself, and she’s not 20 and willowy anymore either. She’s nearly 30 and has the body of a 30 year old woman too nothing wrong with that but stop dressing poorly for your shape and physique. The clothes wear her and them not the other way round.
 
or it’s not practical to wear flossy style clothes all the time and sometimes you are bloated or whatever and need comfort
For the first time she actually looks normal. A pair of black boots would have looked better. And Mummy at 30? She’s not posh. She’s as working class as they come and there’s no shame in that either. Mummy is for the age stunted and creakingly posh aristocrats who have issues due to Nanny and Matron raising them instead of Ma Ma, Freddy isn’t in that league much as she fancies herself to be
 
Her mommy said? 🥴 🥴 :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:

she still looks like an idiot in those white shoes in the rain, trainers would do the job lol.....
Her problem is that mentally she seems to be stuck in her teenage years where mummy and daddy take care of her every whim and need. It is reflected in her wardrobe choice as wear - impractical and uncomfortable. There's no way in hell those clothes she launched are everyday pieces.

To add insult to the injury that set she's wearing is practically her Coco dress divided into a skirt and a dress... and I am pretty sure she had a very similar set she had in her collection. It's baffling how she thinks people will buy her "designs" when she literally copies and pastes other designs. I remember her hauls when she'd buy some poor quality item from River Island and exclaim how it's a "Zimmermann" dupe. She has basically taken a leaf out of these high street handbooks where they copy an original design and replicate it with poor quality materials.

I feel sorry for those people who spend so much money on a product which they can buy from a high street alternative at a much cheaper price. And this is why she no longer films haul videos. Why should she promote her competitors for free (Zara, RI, ASOS, etc) when she can sell her fans her overpriced crap?
 
Her problem is that mentally she seems to be stuck in her teenage years where mummy and daddy take care of her every whim and need. It is reflected in her wardrobe choice as wear - impractical and uncomfortable. There's no way in hell those clothes she launched are everyday pieces.

To add insult to the injury that set she's wearing is practically her Coco dress divided into a skirt and a dress... and I am pretty sure she had a very similar set she had in her collection. It's baffling how she thinks people will buy her "designs" when she literally copies and pastes other designs. I remember her hauls when she'd buy some poor quality item from River Island and exclaim how it's a "Zimmermann" dupe. She has basically taken a leaf out of these high street handbooks where they copy an original design and replicate it with poor quality materials.

I feel sorry for those people who spend so much money on a product which they can buy from a high street alternative at a much cheaper price. And this is why she no longer films haul videos. Why should she promote her competitors for free (Zara, RI, ASOS, etc) when she can sell her fans her overpriced crap?
I feel more sorry for the designer she’s plagiarising
 
She really needs to give it up already....this 'collection' is her worst yet..... she keeps making the same cheap looking dresses/and pieces over and over....hate everything she's shown so far 🥴 the material is awful and these pieces look outdated..... nothing cute, nothing sophisticated here.

1716855783984.png



1716855817319.png


 
To add insult to the injury that set she's wearing is practically her Coco dress divided into a skirt and a dress... and I am pretty sure she had a very similar set she had in her collection. It's baffling how she thinks people will buy her "designs" when she literally copies and pastes other designs
It’s identical (or near enough) to the Mina set from Ladies Ldn.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7986.png
    IMG_7986.png
    113.2 KB · Views: 27
  • IMG_7987.png
    IMG_7987.png
    79.2 KB · Views: 20
  • IMG_7988.png
    IMG_7988.png
    79.3 KB · Views: 25
Those shorts are awful :sick: only she has such bad taste in everything. They are a replica of her beloved Zimmerman diaper shorts and they do not flatter her legs .....at.....all.....can't imagine many people will purchase them. :LOL: sorry hate them!


View attachment 2964055 q

View attachment 2964053 q



View attachment 2964060 q

View attachment 2964062 q

View attachment 2964063 q




Why is the waist where the zipper is....doing that. Sorry I don't know the terminology but it's out of alignment which surely shows how poorly manufactured and or fitting it is.
---
Why is the waist where the zipper is....doing that. Sorry I don't know the terminology but it's out of alignment which surely shows how poorly manufactured and or fitting it is.
You can also see how thin the fabric is, even in these edited photos you can tell where the fabric has been doubled to make the hem. Also it looks so cheap seeing the hemming inside the shorts at the bottom where it flares out, shouldn't they be lined?
 
Why is the waist where the zipper is....doing that. Sorry I don't know the terminology but it's out of alignment which surely shows how poorly manufactured and or fitting it is.
---

You can also see how thin the fabric is, even in these edited photos you can tell where the fabric has been doubled to make the hem. Also it looks so cheap seeing the hemming inside the shorts at the bottom where it flares out, shouldn't they be lined?

they look so cheap and unflattering....um, and sorry I don't like a breeze blowing up my hoohaa :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:
 
Whatever the heck is going on in this picture with the lining makes it look as though she’s lost the elastic in her knickers and they’re halfway down her legs. I can’t believe she actually looked at this and thought it was flattering to post it
 

Attachments

  • EDA67227-5841-426A-8262-BBEDD84821FD.png
    EDA67227-5841-426A-8262-BBEDD84821FD.png
    104 KB · Views: 24
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top