Fleur De Force #10 This one should see us through til 2030

1
Never thought Fleur would ever post a picture of herself in a swimwear. She’s obviously much happier in her body post weight loss good for her. She’s said she’s struggled all her life, and Hannah having always been quite petite must have been hard. Wonder if she’s had a bit of lipo or tuck after ‘completing’ her family. Or just ozempic, they’re super rich so she could afford the best.
 
For someone who recently posted a lengthy explanation as to why she doesn’t post her children‘s face, she sure likes to feature her little girl a lot on her professional Instagram. I don’t know Fleur, I’ll applaud you for your oh-so-protective attitude when you stop including your kids for klicks and views.
IMG_3316.jpeg
IMG_3317.jpeg
IMG_3318.jpeg
IMG_3319.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Sorry for the double post, but it’s even worse than I thought, she has her daughter model in these pics because it was a „pr invite“ 😳
IMG_3320.jpeg

Also, a kids spa? Really? I know she’s raising a mini Fleur who will never have to work a day in her life, but these luxurious girls trips she takes with River are weird. Rich people have some interesting habits 😁 (yes, I know non-rich people go to spas too!)
 
Is it just me or does a kids spa feel super inappropriate? Not sure what they’re doing but I don’t think I’d be comfortable with a stranger touching my child, especially if they’re lightly dressed?

Is River at least wearing a swimming costume or something underneath the cover??
---
From the website…

“ Tailored for children aged 6-16, our Bonpoint spa menu introduces young ones to wellness. Pan Pacific London is the second hotel globally and the first in the UK to offer Bonpoint Beauty experiences for children.
Highly recommended - The Fairy Tale Treatment offers a whimsical and playful experience, combining a child's perspective with interactive storytelling during a facial.”

Wtf. No. They’re the only ones offering because I’m seeing massive safeguarding issues here!

---
Not everything needs to be made child-friendly… some activities should be adults only imo.
 
Last edited:
curious.alice said:
Is it just me or does a kids spa feel super inappropriate? Not sure what they’re doing but I don’t think I’d be comfortable with a stranger touching my child, especially if they’re lightly dressed?

Is River at least wearing a swimming costume or something underneath the cover??
Click to expand...
Don’t know, luckily she hasn’t provided us with any more photo material. But how was Fleur herself not weirded out by the fact that she had to put a toy bunny in the pic to make sure people understand there’s a child, not a small adult.
All the River model pics are not as artistic as Fleur thinks and she’s not protecting her privacy at all. And all this just for a spa visit she could have easily paid for by herself.
 
curious.alice said:
Is it just me or does a kids spa feel super inappropriate? Not sure what they’re doing but I don’t think I’d be comfortable with a stranger touching my child, especially if they’re lightly dressed?

Is River at least wearing a swimming costume or something underneath the cover??
---
From the website…

“ Tailored for children aged 6-16, our Bonpoint spa menu introduces young ones to wellness. Pan Pacific London is the second hotel globally and the first in the UK to offer Bonpoint Beauty experiences for children.
Highly recommended - The Fairy Tale Treatment offers a whimsical and playful experience, combining a child's perspective with interactive storytelling during a facial.”

Wtf. No. They’re the only ones offering because I’m seeing massive safeguarding issues here!

---
Not everything needs to be made child-friendly… some activities should be adults only imo.
Click to expand...
Yes this was my immediate thought! I would not feel comfortable with a stranger massaging my young child! Given River has nothing on her shoulders I would imagine she’s topless?! I guess there could be a strapless swimsuit under the towel.
 
That kids’ spa comes under “things you could do with your money other than setting it on fire.”

I’m aware that sadly even having food in the fridge and several pairs of shoes is a privilege these days- but this crosses absolutely every single line that one could possibly think of. Yes, she got it for free. Yes, it’s advertising. But simply endorsing the fact that it exists is wrong, wrong, wrong.
 
PineappleTopper said:
Did she say River was having a massage or just a spa experience? Could have just been some cucumbers on the eyes and some face or hand cream administered by a lady, whilst her mum was in the room watching.. not creepy. Not weird. A cute girlie experience.. 🤷🏽‍♀️
Click to expand...
There's an image of her lying with a towel over her, bare shouldered, looking very tense. And a mention of a facial. Reference in the company blurb to it being an introduction to regular spa treatments - that's the key really, start em as early as possible!
 
PineappleTopper said:
I find kids having facials a bit ick tbh, it’s cute at home, but a 6 year old does not need any ‘products‘ on their face. The price would suggest it’s not just a cute quick slap of Nivea and a jade roller.
Click to expand...
Yeah, playing spa at home is fun, but actually taking a five (?) year old to a place and let another adult do treatments on them is another level. But - Fleur‘s content is not supposed to be relatable, so I get it. What I don’t get are the modeling shots of her daughter in a bathrobe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top