I think she just uses the Barbour and wellies on a cold or rainy day until she gets to her photo shoot location in a field nearby. At least I hope that's what it is and that they are not meant as a "look"
.Oh dear indeed
:
I don't think he knew she was filming in that clip. I think he came in to get ready for bed and was just babbling to her.Agreed, I've just watched the clip with him going on and on about the number of fireplaces in the house and that display gave me such secondhand embarrasment, as he's such a clueless idiot
Josie on the other hand has a mean streak I just never noticed before, because it was always just her talking to the camera in her filming room.
She could have edited that cringy interaction out, but she chose to leave it in on purpose. The eye rolls she gave the camera were just her way of making him look like a fool (literally) behind his back.
I think she secretly looks down her nose at him and wants us to do the same. Pure manipulation.
Oh! Thank you for putting this up! So happy now! XI think she just uses the Barbour and wellies on a cold or rainy day until she gets to her photo shoot location in a field nearby. At least I hope that's what it is and that they are not meant as a "look"
Oh dear indeed
View attachment 172683 q
This is what he was trying to say re. shorts...This might be a cultural thing.
I've noticed that American men like to wear their shorts long (mostly to their knees), whereas the length Charlie showed us in today's vlog is perfectly acceptable in the Netherlands. They see the other ones as too long (as you can't tan your thighs with them on).
On a personal note: I thought his advice about the right shorts for short legs was very good and that he looked nice in them. (And no, I'm not suddenly blinded by his "good looks", as he is not my type at all)
Nope she was gaslighting this poor woman by claiming that it was a YouTube Mod who decided to delete those posts and not her, because they were offensive, which they were not.She replied to that person about deleting the post. Nothing on the real issue about ad placement though. Does anyone remember if the comments were indeed offensive?
.
.OMG bloody brilliant, this could have been written about my hubbyI think she just uses the Barbour and wellies on a cold or rainy day until she gets to her photo shoot location in a field nearby. At least I hope that's what it is and that they are not meant as a "look"
Oh dear indeed
View attachment 172683 q
Nope. They were just agreeing with Tonia and questioning Josie’s honestyShe replied to that person about deleting the post. Nothing on the real issue about ad placement though. Does anyone remember if the comments were indeed offensive?
That's a new low for her. I am not surprised though. I expect anything from that greedy woman. I am surprised at her followers. With the exception of a couple of them, no one asked her if the ad situation was true. I suppose her followers have to be very ignorant, insecure people who need someone to admire. There is no excuse for them because they were given a lot of opportunities to realize her greedy and dishonest character.Nope she was gaslighting this poor woman by claiming that it was a YouTube Mod who had decided to delete those posts and not her, because they were offensive, which they were not.
That way she did have to take any responsibility for her own actions and she didn't have to address the real issue here: she was lying again and she was caught again
And then she was lying to cover up her previous lying
Have I missed something/your point?
I wish someone asked her it what the woman said was true
She replied to that person about deleting the post. Nothing on the real issue about ad placement though. Does anyone remember if the comments were indeed offensive?
No quite sure, but I think she loves it.View attachment 171593 q
This tashenka has lost is just as bad as Josie has
Is this our OG tashenka back haha
does this site really need to stoop so low and refer to physical violence? I really hope not, wtfIs this a possible contender for our next thread? I know we're only just into this one, but, food for thought
excellent
))If she has blocked words the comment wouldn't even post at all. It wouldn't wait hours to delete and then delete the whole thread.She replied to that person about deleting the post. Nothing on the real issue about ad placement though. Does anyone remember if the comments were indeed offensive?
Lidl has blocked words. Even on IG you can block certain words.
Nope she was gaslighting this poor woman by claiming that it was a YouTube Mod who decided to delete those posts and not her, because they were offensive, which they were not.
That way she did have to take any responsibility for her own actions and she didn't have to address the real issue here: she was lying again and she was caught again
And then she was lying to cover up her previous lying
