She does that already. I just can’t believe she’s done as well as she has by literally repeating the same content over and over again while continuously exploiting her children. She calls it her ‘forever home’ but it’s a massive risk to rely on an extremely fickle industry for your soul income.
Doubt it will be forever. Why would she want to live there when her children have flown the nest. She'll be rattling around that house just like, I suspect, her veneers could be rattling around her mouth.
She’ll be crazy by then
Or knowing Emily it’s just another marketing ploy to boost her channel and she lied about forever home just like everything else. She will say and do anything for money.
I can't either. I did try
I can’t either
All I can’t think of is #Face getting tighter, teeth getting whiter
I haven't actually watched Emz for ages as I just can't bear her plastic personality. I think any vestige left of real personality was packed up and thrown away when she moved to her new abode. I remember watching a few of her early videos and quite liking her but now I just feel she is so insincere
I think it’s exploitative - and the problem is that other parents see it and think they can make money doing the same. So what happens is you end up with Instagram being literally saturated with accounts of just children. As I’ve mentioned before Instagram is a Mecca for peodophiles - and the photos don’t have to be of anything provocative for them to be shared on the dark web. I just think places like Instagram are too big to bring in forceful legislation. It’s the same with other topics - I reported a comment on one of the footballers who got racially abused after the euros and apparently emojis of bananas and monkeys on a black persons profile ‘doesn’t go against Instagram community
So they’re hardly going to do anything about normal photos of children unfortunately. Sadly, when it comes to legislation I think I agree with you although I wonder if rather than the law legislating against the platform alone the law should also legislate against parents or guardians placing their child on any public social media platform? I too, have commented in the past about the impact of 'presented perfectionism' on others mental health. I believe there are people who negatively compare themselves with influencers because of the 'perfect' world these influencers present . Another problem for me is that when it comes to influencers is this belief that surrounds them that they are some how an authority on parenthood or home making. I actually think the likes of Emz believes this herself.I think it’s exploitative - and the problem is that other parents see it and think they can make money doing the same. So what happens is you end up with Instagram being literally saturated with accounts of just children. As I’ve mentioned before Instagram is a Mecca for peodophiles - and the photos don’t have to be of anything provocative for them to be shared on the dark web. I just think places like Instagram are too big to bring in forceful legislation. It’s the same with other topics - I reported a comment on one of the footballers who got racially abused after the euros and apparently emojis of bananas and monkeys on a black persons profile ‘doesn’t go against Instagram community
guidelines’
Also, I said on one of the Mrs Hinch threads that I have no doubt that people like Norris - with their perfect everything are accountable for mental health issues in some people that follow them. Comparison is the thief of joy and no doubt people will feel that their own life is far less superior in comparison
This is so true - it’s such a new thing and we all managed perfectly well before these influencers were about. I absolutely hate the word ‘hack’ - some of them are just so pointless and not time saving/useful at all!
Or are just common sense!
Gets my vote
The gifts looked like lots of items they had been gifted rather than things they had bought, lots of random mis matched items
I can’t create a new thread either but we definitely need to keep the FHM reference
