Admirable that she studied for and passed the Bar exam but it's doubtful that it improves her employment chances in Seattle. She can't compete against recent local law school graduates whose training is more up-to-date, and she certainly can't compete against attorneys her age who graduated an American law school at the same time she did but have steadily worked as attorneys ever since. As far as her chances of finding a job similar to the one she had in Vancouver - that's hardly likely to happen either: not only would they prefer someone familiar with American regulations but even a superficial check into her background is pretty certain to land her application in a rejection folder. Let's face it: she was by far not an exemplary employee and her former agency was likely very happy to get rid of her. A stellar reference is not exactly in the cards for her. It's indicative that while she bragged to no end about working as an "attorney", she never said a word about her job specifically, other than vaguely referencing securities field. No doubt she annoyed her supervisors by routinely leaving early, taking two-hour lunch breaks and likely doing only a bare minimum she could get away with, and she annoyed other investigators by routinely walking into the office carrying a Chanel bag, wearing a Sentarel coat, her hair freshly blow-dried at a salon and all-too-often carrying Nordstrom bags while they, on the same salary, struggled to pay rent while repaying their student loans. No wonder she didn't seem to have made any friends among her former co-workers or have participated in any activities with them.
At this point, it's hard to imagine what career avenue may be open for her. By the age of 30, when most people are just starting to progress in their careers, she successfully ruined hers. If I were in Ginette's shoes I would be very disappointed in my daughter.