This is what I'm thinking and i liked what Phil said about not leaving family behind including the weak in the flashback ep so it'll be interesting to see how this plays out.I enjoyed the flashback episode. Phil was very good. Bit confused as to why keeble has it in for Billy when he wasn't the one to shoot her dad, unless she believes he did?
I really enjoyed the episode I thought Phils character was brilliant but that confused me too. I initially thought that maybe it was because Billy was the one that her dad saw first and so she may have thought it was him, but then realised there would have been no CCTV back then so how would she have even known thatI enjoyed the flashback episode. Phil was very good. Bit confused as to why keeble has it in for Billy when he wasn't the one to shoot her dad, unless she believes he did?
Loved when Phil made the fea after battering him
made the fea?
I thought her voice was too deep to be PeggyThat was the first EastEnders episode I have seen in years. I bet it will have the highest ratings in years, people like myself tuning in out of curiosity.
No disrespect to Jamie Winstone, but she is too hard faced.
I really enjoyed the episode I thought Phils character was brilliant but that confused me too. I initially thought that maybe it was because Billy was the one that her dad saw first and so she may have thought it was him, but then realised there would have been no CCTV back then so how would she have even known that
If he didn't die immediately, then he would've heard Billy's name when they were helping him upUnless he didn't die immediately and told someone
I don't think he will get Billy, I don't think he will "leave family behind". Especially when Billy was probably the least involved or interested in harming someone (at that time)
I definitely thought her mum looked like Honey. As for why now? Because the writers needed a storyI’m intrigued as to how long she’s known this and not done anything until now…. What about the other security guard, do we reckon he told the truth? Did anyone think Keebles mum looked like Honey? X
Sam is a few years older than I am, I, sadly remember that from the early 90s. I think she would be 47 in the show now so I checked Wikipedia and it says Sam's birthday is May so it's right that she'd be 3 in the flashback. Good god, I need to get a lifeI didn't mind last night's episode, I wouldn't mind some more flashbacks. Thought the actor playing Phil did a great job.
Was a bit confused with Sam's age though. It was 1979 and I'm sure either Phil or Grant said at the start that Sam was 3. So is she meant to be 46 now?
Sam is a few years older than I am, I, sadly remember that from the early 90s. I think she would be 47 in the show now so I checked Wikipedia and it says Sam's birthday is May so it's right that she'd be 3 in the flashback. Good god, I need to get a life
Top research I think she could pass for being late 30s in looks and attitude!
Roxy was a toddler in it though she could only just walk Ronnie was holding her hand , Ronnie I reckon the little girl was cast for height as isn’t Ronnie tall? Hence why I think she looked tallerI thought the girls who played Sam, Ronnie and Roxy were all slightly too old. Sam and Ronnie would have been 3 and 4 and both looked about 5/6. And Roxy should have been a baby as she was only born the year before.
Yeah possibly it was the height thing with Ronnie. I guess if they had been a bit younger they wouldn’t have been as good at delivering their few lines either.Roxy was a toddler in it though she could only just walk Ronnie was holding her hand , Ronnie I reckon the little girl was cast for height as isn’t Ronnie tall? Hence why I think she looked taller
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.