Danny Dalimore #2 Will a kid mark the end of the show? Let me know in the comments below!

1
1000033466.jpg


This looks like the drop from Tiana's Bayou Adventure, not sure it was open on his last trip so this I would assume means he has been back already......anything is possible with this twit
 
Emmy79 said:
View attachment 3016231 q

This looks like the drop from Tiana's Bayou Adventure, not sure it was open on his last trip so this I would assume means he has been back already......anything is possible with this twit
Click to expand...
Might be a good idea to spend some time with the kid you allegedly fought so hard for Dan. I cannot believe you run away at every opportunity to chase a dream that will never happen. Maybe time to be responsible. Maybe time to grow the duck up. Maybe time to be a dad. You're not 6 anymore. Mentally maybe but that's beside the point. Sort your bleeping life out and prioritize the more important things now in your life.

And I don't mean Disney you thick twit.
 
Have had the misfortune of this one cropping up in the algorithm from time to time and the nonsense trips before “doing it on a budget” etc, his general idiocy astounds, but it’s been taken to an uncomfortably disturbing level with the addition of a vulnerable child thrown into the life of someone so… well.

Watching this latest video, day 3, Animal Kingdom. I’m 10 mins in and had to pause because of two things. The first is that two men (?) have a child with them that they both make say Daddy after having him for a few weeks, they’ve rushed him to Disney parks, taken him into tropical weather - on the morning, made him change resort, and go to a theme park, and Pizzasafari is open so I’m guessing it’s past 11.

He says the kid is ‘hangry’ because he hasn’t eaten. Sorry, what? What? You have not fed that child in that scenario, and you’re complaining with a joke that he’s telling you he is hungry.

How did he pass any test, surely authorities will be watching these and seeing the alarming negligence? Then you feed him a pizza, while you have a chicken salad. All of it played out on screen.

The thing that’s made me pause and come on here is ‘little man’ wanting to go on roller coasters because “this is his least favourite park” and he doesn’t UNDERSTAND THAT LOOKING AT THE BIRDS IS IMPORTANT. “It’s his age… it’s to be expected.” Danny himself wouldn’t know ‘what’s important‘ about it, he wouldn’t be able to tell you, or educate you… and I enjoy the Disney parks, I enjoy their educational stuff, but this man who has been given the responsibility of looking after a vulnerable child is actually putting this across as some substitute for education. And worst of all, that he’s put that scenario across on camera, and so we know.. we know.

“I have to pinch meself I’m in animal kingdom with me boy” - that says it all. It’s all about you matey.

It makes me actually feel physically sick and uncomfortable, out of worry, for the neglect he is putting on screen, thinking that because he took a child to Disney that solves all ills.

It’s funny in a car crash way to see one person who’s so lacking in basic intelligence, but to inflict it on a child is really problematic.

Am I culpable, in watching this? Do we have a responsibility here?
---
Clarification there because it seems they’ve had the kid for more than a few weeks - my comment about him calling them ‘daddy’ was to do with the rush of it all, but I’m sure he was doing it from day dot.
 
Last edited:
I had to stop watching after their travel day to Paris. I couldn’t believe the noise a grown man was making in the company of “little man”. Screeching at every turn and forcing Con onto camera against his will. I found it extremely uncomfortable, haven’t watched since.

Using a vulnerable child as click bait across all platforms is wrong and I bet the only reason we’re not seeing his face is because Con has put his foot down.
 
Charrots said:
Clarification there because it seems they’ve had the kid for more than a few weeks - my comment about him calling them ‘daddy’ was to do with the rush of it all, but I’m sure he was doing it from day dot.
Click to expand...
How old even is the lad. My child is infant school age, and I am 'Dad' now, not daddy.

Totally agree with your post, you don't just take a child out in the morning without feeding them! When we go, there is breakfast stuff in the room, and our child eats before heading out, even if just some fruit and having a late breakfast or early lunch when in the parks.

As someone who is such an expert, you'd have thought he'd realise it takes time to get to the parks. Poor kid was likely really hungry by the time they got some dirt pizza.
 
He went to great lengths to explain how he's not putting the kid's face on camera to respect his privacy and he can't consent at his age so he'll be blurring his face out. Ok, well intentioned. But then he goes and puts him all over the vlogs (yes his face is mostly blurred) but he's including conversations, the kid speaking, and just generally being "on camera". How does that protect his privacy? If he was better at this, he could tell the story of the kid being there, having a family holiday without actually putting him on camera at all. He seems to manage to keep Con out of shot most of the time at his request. Makes a mockery of the whole kids can't consent argument. If he can't consent, he shouldn't be on camera at all. End of.

Oh and don't get me started on the way he actually calls him "little man" to his face. I understand he doesn't want his name out there so you refer to him as little man, but he actually calls him little man! It's ridiculous, the kid must think that's his name!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top