Conor McGregor #13 We Stand With Nikita

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Things you love to see!🤣
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20241126_180031.jpg
    Screenshot_20241126_180031.jpg
    55.9 KB · Views: 9
He's lost his collaboration with the game hit man now too
---
Ohh, he doesn't even own the brand and they are even taking his image and name off it! 😅

Let's hope they're not relying on those sales solely, because that company is surely f***ed either way if they are. Unless there's a complete rebrand.
---
‘The Double Champ does not do what he wants’



Love to see this 👌👌👌
 
Last edited:
Why is james lawerence so angry when he has been found not liable

Saying she's lied about him and all. Should he not be delighted to be found not liable.

Maybe his bum buddy conor is cross with him

If ever there is evidence he's a paid Patsy it's his outbursts since the trial. I've never known someone get off the hook for a serious crime and have such a reaction. Obviously McGregor has him on puppet strings saying the dumbest tit ever.
 
Is there any way that the jury could have given extra information to the judge that they didn’t find JL liable because they don’t believe anything happened at all i.e they believe Nikita or the opposite if that was true because that has a huge influence on who pays the legal proceedings. Nikita didn’t want to bring a case against him but his claim made her
 
Is there any way that the jury could have given extra information to the judge that they didn’t find JL liable because they don’t believe anything happened at all i.e they believe Nikita or the opposite if that was true because that has a huge influence on who pays the legal proceedings. Nikita didn’t want to bring a case against him but his claim made her
Maybe they saw Conors payoffs to him
 
Is there any way that the jury could have given extra information to the judge that they didn’t find JL liable because they don’t believe anything happened at all i.e they believe Nikita or the opposite if that was true because that has a huge influence on who pays the legal proceedings. Nikita didn’t want to bring a case against him but his claim made her

the fact there was none of his DNA detected at all
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top