Chloe Elizabeth #4 Womeo, Womeo where art thou Womeo? With a stranger while mummy hunts a new man

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
No she can’t. The money she gets from him should go to the child. That’s what child support is. It’s not meant to fund her personal holidays / surgeries.

People have actually been sued for not using their child support correctly.
I know its not meant too but noone is going to come asking her for receipts on what her child maintenance is spent on .Whos been sued for not using their CM correctly ?
 
I know its not meant too but noone is going to come asking her for receipts on what her child maintenance is spent on .Whos been sued for not using their CM correctly ?

They may not ask for receipts but at the same time, if she’s living at home and got no bills to pay and getting thousands from him, yet there’s no sign of a private nursery, private medical care and so on, then he can put in a dispute and say it’s not being used correctly. If he’s giving her money, he should have a say on how it’s spent.

A lot of people have been sued for not using child support correctly. If I was a dad and giving my baby mum money and she’s using it to get designer bags for herself and nothing for the baby, I’ll definitely go to court.
 
No she can’t. The money she gets from him should go to the child. That’s what child support is. It’s not meant to fund her personal holidays / surgeries.

People have actually been sued for not using their child support correctly.

I agree lol he shouldn’t be funding her life, he should just pay directly for things like nappies milk clothes wipes etc top up her electric whatever material things if he doesn’t wanna give her cash. He doesn’t HAVE to give her cash (I know u didn’t say that somebody else did) he just has to provide using a certain amount of his income if he has an order saying so, normally via CSA, and he doesn’t HAVE to do anything if he doesn’t. He can provide that in any way, paying for nursery is another way some people do it. She isn’t owed cash lol. He should be providing for sure but her baby isn’t a cash cow 😂
 
I don’t think CSA exists anymore, it’s CMS now, but if it works the same way, they work out how much money is owed based on the fathers income, number of overnights the child has with the father per month, and he’ll have a slight reduction as he also has a second child to pay for.
I don’t think they backdate the money but can chase for the money if it isn’t paid correctly once the agreement is in place.
Legally, Chloe doesn’t need to disclose what the money is spend on. And the CMS can’t tell you what to do with the payments either, there’s some things payments aren’t intended for and that includes private education. Nursery fees typically start at around £45+ per day before the child is 3 so £300 wouldn’t go THAT far re: nursery fees.
Any decent mother would use the payments only for the child’s needs, and put any leftover in a savings account for the child. Whether they do or not is a different story 😂
 
Do some of you not have kids? £300 a month is barely enough for clothes and food how is she gonna use that for surgery and holidays 🤣🤣🤣 no matter what the circumstances she is the full time parent and deserves the money.

I mean I have 2 kids and it doesn’t cost me £300 each month for their food and clothes. Lol that actually is quite a bit 🤷🏻‍♀️ Not saying he doesn’t need to pay her cause he does but I can’t imagine Chloe spending £300 a month on stuff for Romeo, unless she’s buying his chavvy ‘designer’ stuff
 
I mean I have 2 kids and it doesn’t cost me £300 each month for their food and clothes. Lol that actually is quite a bit 🤷🏻‍♀️ Not saying he doesn’t need to pay her cause he does but I can’t imagine Chloe spending £300 a month on stuff for Romeo, unless she’s buying his chavvy ‘designer’ stuff

This is what I mean. £300 is enough to give for a baby under a year old, considering he should help pay for half of his expenses. If she is smart with her money, £300 is enough. It’s not like she has him in daycare

Regardless of the law, I don’t think he needs to give a percentage of his earnings unless it goes on private education. I would be pissed if I’m giving my baby mum thousands and theres nothing to show for it, but her going on holidays to Ibiza and getting surgeries.

I get £100 a month off my child’s father. I think £300 a month is more than enough.

You should get more than £100. That’s £25 a week. That’s ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
Do some of you not have kids? £300 a month is barely enough for clothes and food how is she gonna use that for surgery and holidays 🤣🤣🤣 no matter what the circumstances she is the full time parent and deserves the money.
Some of us choose not to have children as we can’t afford them... like she should have chosen...

Also, she could just get a proper job if she can’t afford him. I don’t see why men should HAVE to pay unless they want to be in the child’s life. We also don’t know whether he actually wanted another child.
 
bet she’s blown all her money in beefa and waiting for her second cost of living payment, times are tough huns x

I definitely feel like she’s running out of money and that’s why she’s all of a sudden talking about child support.

how long has she been back from Ibiza and she hasn’t even starting on her aesthetics. It’s actually funny how everyone she hangs out with have established careers apart from her.
 
Maintenance payments are based on a percentage of earnings to make the system “fair” for everyone. It’s far from perfect but just the way it is.

And men should absolutely have to pay for their children. It’s fucked up not to want anything to do with your kids in the first place, but if you are going to have sex you need to be prepared to take on the possible outcome. No contraception method is 100% so it’s up to the individual if they want to take the gamble.
 
Considering he earns £10000 a month, If CMS end up contacting him, I think he’ll have to pay her around £1000 a month.

If so, she has no excuse to keep living with her mum and should have more than enough money to rent a two bed flat in Newcastle.
 
Maintenance payments are based on a percentage of earnings to make the system “fair” for everyone. It’s far from perfect but just the way it is.

And men should absolutely have to pay for their children. It’s fucked up not to want anything to do with your kids in the first place, but if you are going to have sex you need to be prepared to take on the possible outcome. No contraception method is 100% so it’s up to the individual if they want to take the gamble.

Tough one…. With the “pro choice” movement the woman ultimately has 100% choice on whether or not she keeps the baby and father has no say … with that IF a man wants nothing to do with the child then it’s his “choice” to not have to pay or have any involvement

I’m not saying I agree with this .. but that’s the stance some people will take which is valid and fair

The thing is how do you prove the man didn’t want the baby?

The issue is look at the likes of Lauryn Goodman who basically got pregnant by a footballer on purpose PURELY for maintenance support … no way is that fair
 
Some of us choose not to have children as we can’t afford them... like she should have chosen...

Also, she could just get a proper job if she can’t afford him. I don’t see why men should HAVE to pay unless they want to be in the child’s life. We also don’t know whether he actually wanted another child.
You joking mate? 😂😂 He should of CHOSEN to wear a condom then. Also circumstances change and money circumstances change, you don’t know one day you could be homeless you can’t predict the future like that.
 
You joking mate? 😂😂 He should of CHOSEN to wear a condom then. Also circumstances change and money circumstances change, you don’t know one day you could be homeless you can’t predict the future like that.
How do you know the condom didn’t split or something? Also, 3 people agree with me ‘mate’

You joking mate? 😂😂 He should of CHOSEN to wear a condom then. Also circumstances change and money circumstances change, you don’t know one day you could be homeless you can’t predict the future like that.
& she isn’t homeless, this is based on HER situation. I’m not saying this about anyone else am I??

Tough one…. With the “pro choice” movement the woman ultimately has 100% choice on whether or not she keeps the baby and father has no say … with that IF a man wants nothing to do with the child then it’s his “choice” to not have to pay or have any involvement

I’m not saying I agree with this .. but that’s the stance some people will take which is valid and fair

The thing is how do you prove the man didn’t want the baby?

The issue is look at the likes of Lauryn Goodman who basically got pregnant by a footballer on purpose PURELY for maintenance support … no way is that fair
THIS. I’m sorry but if people are naive enough to think that people don’t get pregnant by someone ‘famous’ for the money, then that’s on them. Men should also have a choice not to have a child, they don’t get the choice of abortion. This comes from someone who has no ‘father’ figure.
 
How do you know the condom didn’t split or something? Also, 3 people agree with me ‘mate’


& she isn’t homeless, this is based on HER situation. I’m not saying this about anyone else am I??


THIS. I’m sorry but if people are naive enough to think that people don’t get pregnant by someone ‘famous’ for the money, then that’s on them. Men should also have a choice not to have a child, they don’t get the choice of abortion. This comes from someone who has no ‘father’ figure.
He didn’t wear a condom tho?? Chloe was on birth control as she stated that’s why she was so shocked! He chose to rely on it (obviously) instead of wrapping it, if he didn’t want a baby he should of protected HIMSELF, not that I think for one minute he didn’t want him as when they announced the pregnancy he was happy about it? I don’t know what’s gone on after. I don’t care that three people agree it’s idiotic 😂 I’m saying she might of been able to afford him at the time then her money circumstance could’ve changed how do you know??

How do you know the condom didn’t split or something? Also, 3 people agree with me ‘mate’


& she isn’t homeless, this is based on HER situation. I’m not saying this about anyone else am I??


THIS. I’m sorry but if people are naive enough to think that people don’t get pregnant by someone ‘famous’ for the money, then that’s on them. Men should also have a choice not to have a child, they don’t get the choice of abortion. This comes from someone who has no ‘father’ figure.
Also to say women should only have them if they can afford them is stupidddddd, there’s women who can not abort after being raped. Think about what you say before it leaves your mouth.
 
How do you know the condom didn’t split or something? Also, 3 people agree with me ‘mate’


& she isn’t homeless, this is based on HER situation. I’m not saying this about anyone else am I??


THIS. I’m sorry but if people are naive enough to think that people don’t get pregnant by someone ‘famous’ for the money, then that’s on them. Men should also have a choice not to have a child, they don’t get the choice of abortion. This comes from someone who has no ‘father’ figure.
Why you defending luis so hard?? He ain’t gonna shag you mate
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top