Samsmummy2004
Member
Ha ha feel freeIf you allow me @Samsmummy2004 I would like to submit this thread suggestion: Rick the Dick you are an absolute lying deceitful prick!
Ha ha feel freeIf you allow me @Samsmummy2004 I would like to submit this thread suggestion: Rick the Dick you are an absolute lying deceitful prick!
Wonder how much he’s going to charge? Anyone ?Wasn’t he supposedly EOL a day or two ago? Yet now he wants to offer 5 sessions of life coaching . Make it make sense
God clearlyJesus christ on a bike. What is this idiot on?! Seriously?! What does he think he is?!!!
For those of you who work in the field, do you know if it is rare for a colonoscopy and CT scan to miss 25-30 tumours? (The number seems to differ - Bowelbro website claimed 25 and Rich’s book claims 30)
Richard’s book says:
“I had in fact 30 additional tumours in my peritoneal lining, my omentum, my pelvis, my abdominal wall, my upper colon, my lower colon and another was wedged against my ribs.”
Why would not all of these (excluding those which can be covered by ‘peritoneal metastasis’) be mentioned in the summary of his cancer journey from Dr Gaya? Is this an inconsistency or is it just that the level of detail isn’t needed in a summary?
“Presented with worsening abdominal pain April 2022. Investigations revealed
primary sigmoid adenocarcinoma at 35 cm from the anal verge. Initially felt to be T3 N1 MO MMR proficient. KRAS mutation. Represented with bowel obstruction prior to elective surgery.
11th May 2022 attempted anterior resection abandoned due to peritoneal metastasis and tumour extending to the lateral pelvic sidewall. T4 N1 M1b (liver, peritoneal). Loop colostomy formed. Primary tumour in situ. 4 small liver metastases, 2 in segment 2, and 2 in segment 4.”
Claims he’s EOL, what an insult to my mum & dad. My mum suffered incredible pain for 12 weeks couldn’t eat or move from her bed for 12 weeks, my dad I found on the floor didn’t av chance to say bye or be there for him. This clown is playing us, he’s making my blood boil on a daily basis!Wasn’t he supposedly EOL a day or two ago? Yet now he wants to offer 5 sessions of life coaching . Make it make sense
Thanks, really interesting. I’m guessing also that a surgeon doesn’t tend to tell the patient they’re terminal immediately after operating on them- they might tell them they’ve discovered additional tumours but pathological (?) analysis and MDT discussion would be required before telling the patient the full detail?Colonoscopy would pick up anything in the colon, CT wouldn’t necessarily pick up things that accurately - MRI and PETs are better. My question would be where was the MDT discussion? Surgeons don’t just operate without MDT input, and when the scans and biopsies were discussed that would have brought up the possibility of peritoneal spread… it’s not usually such a “shock” to the surgeons.
Did we ever get to the bottom of why he wasn’t referred to St Marks, or Basingstoke for that matter? Tom Cecil is a leading expert in Peritoneal Malignancy
So I’d he had emergency surgery why does it state elective ? There is a difference. So he was due to have surgery it was planned but then he had an obstruction right? And as an emergency they would have opened him up not laparoscopic surgery am I right ? And did anyone know that “The Bowel Movement” donated two thousand pounds to his GFM ?! I’m livid if he’s lying and the money has not been used for treatment it is fraud and theft. That family would be heartbroken.For those of you who work in the field, do you know if it is rare for a colonoscopy and CT scan to miss 25-30 tumours? (The number seems to differ - Bowelbro website claimed 25 and Rich’s book claims 30)
Richard’s book says:
“I had in fact 30 additional tumours in my peritoneal lining, my omentum, my pelvis, my abdominal wall, my upper colon, my lower colon and another was wedged against my ribs.”
Why would not all of these (excluding those which can be covered by ‘peritoneal metastasis’) be mentioned in the summary of his cancer journey from Dr Gaya? Is this an inconsistency or is it just that the level of detail isn’t needed in a summary?
“Presented with worsening abdominal pain April 2022. Investigations revealed
primary sigmoid adenocarcinoma at 35 cm from the anal verge. Initially felt to be T3 N1 MO MMR proficient. KRAS mutation. Represented with bowel obstruction prior to elective surgery.
11th May 2022 attempted anterior resection abandoned due to peritoneal metastasis and tumour extending to the lateral pelvic sidewall. T4 N1 M1b (liver, peritoneal). Loop colostomy formed. Primary tumour in situ. 4 small liver metastases, 2 in segment 2, and 2 in segment 4.”
Thanks, really interesting. I’m guessing also that a surgeon doesn’t tend to tell the patient they’re terminal immediately after operating on them- they might tell them they’ve discovered additional tumours but pathological (?) analysis and MDT discussion would be required before telling the patient the full detail?
I’m so bleeping frustrated and confused it says he had liver mets but I thought NGH said he didn’t and Dick and Lisa the liar begged them to check again and again ??!!!For those of you who work in the field, do you know if it is rare for a colonoscopy and CT scan to miss 25-30 tumours? (The number seems to differ - Bowelbro website claimed 25 and Rich’s book claims 30)
Richard’s book says:
“I had in fact 30 additional tumours in my peritoneal lining, my omentum, my pelvis, my abdominal wall, my upper colon, my lower colon and another was wedged against my ribs.”
Why would not all of these (excluding those which can be covered by ‘peritoneal metastasis’) be mentioned in the summary of his cancer journey from Dr Gaya? Is this an inconsistency or is it just that the level of detail isn’t needed in a summary?
“Presented with worsening abdominal pain April 2022. Investigations revealed
primary sigmoid adenocarcinoma at 35 cm from the anal verge. Initially felt to be T3 N1 MO MMR proficient. KRAS mutation. Represented with bowel obstruction prior to elective surgery.
11th May 2022 attempted anterior resection abandoned due to peritoneal metastasis and tumour extending to the lateral pelvic sidewall. T4 N1 M1b (liver, peritoneal). Loop colostomy formed. Primary tumour in situ. 4 small liver metastases, 2 in segment 2, and 2 in segment 4.”
Strangely I found this random comment amongst all the arse licking ones, no context, just this.Wonder how much he’s going to charge? Anyone ?
---
God clearly
So I’d ge gad emergency surgery why does it state elective ? There is a difference. So he was due to have surgery it was planned but then he had an obstruction right? And as an emergency they would have opened him up not laparoscopic surgery am I right ? And did anyone know that “The Bowel Movement” donated two thousand pounds to his GFM ?! I’m livid if he’s lying and the money has not been used for treatment it is fraud and theft. That family would be heartbroken.
He has stated time and time again opened him up ?I can’t answer the question without knowing the context. If he was scheduled for elective cancer surgery, but had an obstruction prior to going in… they may have just admitted him under the same episode, and it would still count as an elective episode. Open vs laparoscopic I don’t know, I’m not a surgeon, they could have been doing it Robotically for all we know?
My daughter's CT scan showed a mass and the possibility of kidney involvement, she was in and had a subtotal colectomy and ileostomy within 3 days of the scan, they wouldn't tell her one way or the other what they thought, she had to wait 3 weeks for the results of the biopsies, so I find it hard to believe they were able to tell him this information straight away.Thanks, really interesting. I’m guessing also that a surgeon doesn’t tend to tell the patient they’re terminal immediately after operating on them- they might tell them they’ve discovered additional tumours but pathological (?) analysis and MDT discussion would be required before telling the patient the full detail?
He has stated time and time again opened him up ?
Lol filbychick has her profile pic as a flower, I’m surprised he hasn’t kicked her off his insta !!Strangely I found this random comment amongst all the arse licking ones, no context, just this.View attachment 2407472 q
My daughter's CT scan showed a mass and the possibility of kidney involvement, she was in and had a subtotal colectomy and ileostomy within 3 days of the scan, they wouldn't tell her one way or the other what they thought, she had to wait 3 weeks for the results of the biopsies, so I find it hard to believe they were able to tell him this information straight away.
My aunt had routine colonoscopies she had one in June 21 then Nov 22 was diagnosed with st 4 colon cancer the family asked how this could be missed and apparently it can beFor those of you who work in the field, do you know if it is rare for a colonoscopy and CT scan to miss 25-30 tumours? (The number seems to differ - Bowelbro website claimed 25 and Rich’s book claims 30)
Richard’s book says:
“I had in fact 30 additional tumours in my peritoneal lining, my omentum, my pelvis, my abdominal wall, my upper colon, my lower colon and another was wedged against my ribs.”
Why would not all of these (excluding those which can be covered by ‘peritoneal metastasis’) be mentioned in the summary of his cancer journey from Dr Gaya? Is this an inconsistency or is it just that the level of detail isn’t needed in a summary?
“Presented with worsening abdominal pain April 2022. Investigations revealed
primary sigmoid adenocarcinoma at 35 cm from the anal verge. Initially felt to be T3 N1 MO MMR proficient. KRAS mutation. Represented with bowel obstruction prior to elective surgery.
11th May 2022 attempted anterior resection abandoned due to peritoneal metastasis and tumour extending to the lateral pelvic sidewall. T4 N1 M1b (liver, peritoneal). Loop colostomy formed. Primary tumour in situ. 4 small liver metastases, 2 in segment 2, and 2 in segment 4.”
I’m so bleeping frustrated and confused it says he had liver mets but I thought NGH said he didn’t and Dick and Lisa the liar begged them to check again and again ??!!!
Yeah, I’ve just read through that thing someone else posted earlier… the way he’s said it, it makes it sound like they fully opened him up for sure, but you’d have scars. Also, what is this HIRAS he’s talking about… it’s HIPEC