BowelBro #8 Where’s the book, Rich you crook?

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1

Looks like I was wrong then. Not a radio silence day today. Coaching sessions now available, I wouldn't even let this man teach my children to cross the road, he'd most probably mess that up.

My absolute god, I can not believe the absolute bullshit that spouts from this mans mouth. Are we sure Lisa is his wife and not his carer? Does she just sit in another room while he shouts his far fetched ideas, replying with a sigh and "that's nice Richie"?

I am done, this man is a charlatan and a fraud yet he wants to give off the persona like he is the Dalai Lama.

Richard if you read here you need help, serious mental help. You have achieved absolutely nothing, your whole life is a fake scam. To add to it all, this latest step (I will say latest step as I do not believe it is your last), not one thing you have ever done has helped the cancer community, you are a disgrace.
 
For those of you who work in the field, do you know if it is rare for a colonoscopy and CT scan to miss 25-30 tumours? (The number seems to differ - Bowelbro website claimed 25 and Rich’s book claims 30)


Richard’s book says:

“I had in fact 30 additional tumours in my peritoneal lining, my omentum, my pelvis, my abdominal wall, my upper colon, my lower colon and another was wedged against my ribs.”

Why would not all of these (excluding those which can be covered by ‘peritoneal metastasis’) be mentioned in the summary of his cancer journey from Dr Gaya? Is this an inconsistency or is it just that the level of detail isn’t needed in a summary?

“Presented with worsening abdominal pain April 2022. Investigations revealed
primary sigmoid adenocarcinoma at 35 cm from the anal verge. Initially felt to be T3 N1 MO MMR proficient. KRAS mutation. Represented with bowel obstruction prior to elective surgery.
11th May 2022 attempted anterior resection abandoned due to peritoneal metastasis and tumour extending to the lateral pelvic sidewall. T4 N1 M1b (liver, peritoneal). Loop colostomy formed. Primary tumour in situ. 4 small liver metastases, 2 in segment 2, and 2 in segment 4.”
 
For those of you who work in the field, do you know if it is rare for a colonoscopy and CT scan to miss 25-30 tumours? (The number seems to differ - Bowelbro website claimed 25 and Rich’s book claims 30)


Richard’s book says:

“I had in fact 30 additional tumours in my peritoneal lining, my omentum, my pelvis, my abdominal wall, my upper colon, my lower colon and another was wedged against my ribs.”

Why would not all of these (excluding those which can be covered by ‘peritoneal metastasis’) be mentioned in the summary of his cancer journey from Dr Gaya? Is this an inconsistency or is it just that the level of detail isn’t needed in a summary?

“Presented with worsening abdominal pain April 2022. Investigations revealed
primary sigmoid adenocarcinoma at 35 cm from the anal verge. Initially felt to be T3 N1 MO MMR proficient. KRAS mutation. Represented with bowel obstruction prior to elective surgery.
11th May 2022 attempted anterior resection abandoned due to peritoneal metastasis and tumour extending to the lateral pelvic sidewall. T4 N1 M1b (liver, peritoneal). Loop colostomy formed. Primary tumour in situ. 4 small liver metastases, 2 in segment 2, and 2 in segment 4.”

Colonoscopy would pick up anything in the colon, CT wouldn’t necessarily pick up things that accurately - MRI and PETs are better. My question would be where was the MDT discussion? Surgeons don’t just operate without MDT input, and when the scans and biopsies were discussed that would have brought up the possibility of peritoneal spread… it’s not usually such a “shock” to the surgeons.

Did we ever get to the bottom of why he wasn’t referred to St Marks, or Basingstoke for that matter? Tom Cecil is a leading expert in Peritoneal Malignancy
 
Wasn’t he supposedly EOL a day or two ago? Yet now he wants to offer 5 sessions of life coaching 🤷🏼‍♀️. Make it make sense
Claims he’s EOL, what an insult to my mum & dad. My mum suffered incredible pain for 12 weeks couldn’t eat or move from her bed for 12 weeks, my dad I found on the floor didn’t av chance to say bye or be there for him. This clown is playing us, he’s making my blood boil on a daily basis!
 
Colonoscopy would pick up anything in the colon, CT wouldn’t necessarily pick up things that accurately - MRI and PETs are better. My question would be where was the MDT discussion? Surgeons don’t just operate without MDT input, and when the scans and biopsies were discussed that would have brought up the possibility of peritoneal spread… it’s not usually such a “shock” to the surgeons.

Did we ever get to the bottom of why he wasn’t referred to St Marks, or Basingstoke for that matter? Tom Cecil is a leading expert in Peritoneal Malignancy
Thanks, really interesting. I’m guessing also that a surgeon doesn’t tend to tell the patient they’re terminal immediately after operating on them- they might tell them they’ve discovered additional tumours but pathological (?) analysis and MDT discussion would be required before telling the patient the full detail?
 
For those of you who work in the field, do you know if it is rare for a colonoscopy and CT scan to miss 25-30 tumours? (The number seems to differ - Bowelbro website claimed 25 and Rich’s book claims 30)


Richard’s book says:

“I had in fact 30 additional tumours in my peritoneal lining, my omentum, my pelvis, my abdominal wall, my upper colon, my lower colon and another was wedged against my ribs.”

Why would not all of these (excluding those which can be covered by ‘peritoneal metastasis’) be mentioned in the summary of his cancer journey from Dr Gaya? Is this an inconsistency or is it just that the level of detail isn’t needed in a summary?

“Presented with worsening abdominal pain April 2022. Investigations revealed
primary sigmoid adenocarcinoma at 35 cm from the anal verge. Initially felt to be T3 N1 MO MMR proficient. KRAS mutation. Represented with bowel obstruction prior to elective surgery.
11th May 2022 attempted anterior resection abandoned due to peritoneal metastasis and tumour extending to the lateral pelvic sidewall. T4 N1 M1b (liver, peritoneal). Loop colostomy formed. Primary tumour in situ. 4 small liver metastases, 2 in segment 2, and 2 in segment 4.”
So I’d he had emergency surgery why does it state elective ? There is a difference. So he was due to have surgery it was planned but then he had an obstruction right? And as an emergency they would have opened him up not laparoscopic surgery am I right ? And did anyone know that “The Bowel Movement” donated two thousand pounds to his GFM ?! I’m livid if he’s lying and the money has not been used for treatment it is fraud and theft. That family would be heartbroken.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4101.jpeg
    IMG_4101.jpeg
    52.3 KB · Views: 29
Thanks, really interesting. I’m guessing also that a surgeon doesn’t tend to tell the patient they’re terminal immediately after operating on them- they might tell them they’ve discovered additional tumours but pathological (?) analysis and MDT discussion would be required before telling the patient the full detail?

Yeah, that would not happen. There are a lot of factors that determine life span… second opinions that they can get, they didn’t know it was in the liver at that point so he could have been a candidate for a HIPEC
 
For those of you who work in the field, do you know if it is rare for a colonoscopy and CT scan to miss 25-30 tumours? (The number seems to differ - Bowelbro website claimed 25 and Rich’s book claims 30)


Richard’s book says:

“I had in fact 30 additional tumours in my peritoneal lining, my omentum, my pelvis, my abdominal wall, my upper colon, my lower colon and another was wedged against my ribs.”

Why would not all of these (excluding those which can be covered by ‘peritoneal metastasis’) be mentioned in the summary of his cancer journey from Dr Gaya? Is this an inconsistency or is it just that the level of detail isn’t needed in a summary?

“Presented with worsening abdominal pain April 2022. Investigations revealed
primary sigmoid adenocarcinoma at 35 cm from the anal verge. Initially felt to be T3 N1 MO MMR proficient. KRAS mutation. Represented with bowel obstruction prior to elective surgery.
11th May 2022 attempted anterior resection abandoned due to peritoneal metastasis and tumour extending to the lateral pelvic sidewall. T4 N1 M1b (liver, peritoneal). Loop colostomy formed. Primary tumour in situ. 4 small liver metastases, 2 in segment 2, and 2 in segment 4.”
I’m so bleeping frustrated and confused it says he had liver mets but I thought NGH said he didn’t and Dick and Lisa the liar begged them to check again and again ??!!!
 
So I’d ge gad emergency surgery why does it state elective ? There is a difference. So he was due to have surgery it was planned but then he had an obstruction right? And as an emergency they would have opened him up not laparoscopic surgery am I right ? And did anyone know that “The Bowel Movement” donated two thousand pounds to his GFM ?! I’m livid if he’s lying and the money has not been used for treatment it is fraud and theft. That family would be heartbroken.

I can’t answer the question without knowing the context. If he was scheduled for elective cancer surgery, but had an obstruction prior to going in… they may have just admitted him under the same episode, and it would still count as an elective episode. Open vs laparoscopic I don’t know, I’m not a surgeon, they could have been doing it Robotically for all we know?
 
I can’t answer the question without knowing the context. If he was scheduled for elective cancer surgery, but had an obstruction prior to going in… they may have just admitted him under the same episode, and it would still count as an elective episode. Open vs laparoscopic I don’t know, I’m not a surgeon, they could have been doing it Robotically for all we know?
He has stated time and time again opened him up ?
 
Thanks, really interesting. I’m guessing also that a surgeon doesn’t tend to tell the patient they’re terminal immediately after operating on them- they might tell them they’ve discovered additional tumours but pathological (?) analysis and MDT discussion would be required before telling the patient the full detail?
My daughter's CT scan showed a mass and the possibility of kidney involvement, she was in and had a subtotal colectomy and ileostomy within 3 days of the scan, they wouldn't tell her one way or the other what they thought, she had to wait 3 weeks for the results of the biopsies, so I find it hard to believe they were able to tell him this information straight away.
 
Coaching?? Does this plamf even know what coaching is? It's a very specific management skill and certainly not one suited to be delivered by a narcissist as it rarely, if ever, relies on the coach talking about their own lived experience, that's the whole point of it, to encourage the coachee to develop their own strengths and solutions. I have done coaching before in a previous role and it's very challenging for both parties. This guy is tuned to the bloody moon.
 
My daughter's CT scan showed a mass and the possibility of kidney involvement, she was in and had a subtotal colectomy and ileostomy within 3 days of the scan, they wouldn't tell her one way or the other what they thought, she had to wait 3 weeks for the results of the biopsies, so I find it hard to believe they were able to tell him this information straight away.

They wouldn’t, it’s just not the way it works at all. He has no idea the internal workings of an MDT etc, therefore his story is all muddled because he hasn’t done his research properly
 
For those of you who work in the field, do you know if it is rare for a colonoscopy and CT scan to miss 25-30 tumours? (The number seems to differ - Bowelbro website claimed 25 and Rich’s book claims 30)


Richard’s book says:

“I had in fact 30 additional tumours in my peritoneal lining, my omentum, my pelvis, my abdominal wall, my upper colon, my lower colon and another was wedged against my ribs.”

Why would not all of these (excluding those which can be covered by ‘peritoneal metastasis’) be mentioned in the summary of his cancer journey from Dr Gaya? Is this an inconsistency or is it just that the level of detail isn’t needed in a summary?

“Presented with worsening abdominal pain April 2022. Investigations revealed
primary sigmoid adenocarcinoma at 35 cm from the anal verge. Initially felt to be T3 N1 MO MMR proficient. KRAS mutation. Represented with bowel obstruction prior to elective surgery.
11th May 2022 attempted anterior resection abandoned due to peritoneal metastasis and tumour extending to the lateral pelvic sidewall. T4 N1 M1b (liver, peritoneal). Loop colostomy formed. Primary tumour in situ. 4 small liver metastases, 2 in segment 2, and 2 in segment 4.”
My aunt had routine colonoscopies she had one in June 21 then Nov 22 was diagnosed with st 4 colon cancer the family asked how this could be missed and apparently it can be
 
I’m so bleeping frustrated and confused it says he had liver mets but I thought NGH said he didn’t and Dick and Lisa the liar begged them to check again and again ??!!!

That’s weird actually as he said on Instagram that cancer in his liver was confirmed in March 2023 and when he came back in June 2023 after closing his account briefly he said the liver mets had gone wild and there were 9 there.

But Dr Gaya’s summary reads as though liver mets were identified prior to chemo in June 2022 and additional growths were identified in March 2023.

“Presented with worsening abdominal pain April 2022. Investigations revealed primary sigmoid adenocarcinoma at 35 cm from the anal verge. Initially felt to be T3 N1 MO MMR proficient. KRAS mutation. Represented with bowel obstruction prior to elective surgery. 11th May 2022 attempted anterior resection abandoned due to peritoneal metastasis and tumour extending to the lateral pelvic sidewall. T4 N1 M1b (liver, peritoneal). Loop colostomy formed. Primary tumour in situ. 4 small liver metastases, 2 in segment 2, and 2 in segment 4. FOLFOXIRI chemotherapy June 2022. Several large gaps in chemotherapy due to admissions for sepsis. October 2022 stable disease. PCI (peritoneal cancer index) 24. Ongoing stable disease January 2023. March 2023 stable primary tumour, stable peritoneal disease, new oligo progressive liver metastasis segment 5. Other liver metastases relatively stable.”
---
Yeah, I’ve just read through that thing someone else posted earlier… the way he’s said it, it makes it sound like they fully opened him up for sure, but you’d have scars. Also, what is this HIRAS he’s talking about… it’s HIPEC 😂

Wow that error made it into all the newspaper articles about him as well!
 

Attachments

  • 779C3923-091D-47D5-87D0-BABB4183D9C0.jpeg
    779C3923-091D-47D5-87D0-BABB4183D9C0.jpeg
    91.1 KB · Views: 27
  • 0DE5DAC3-A52A-42E4-81B2-F834664134EE.png
    0DE5DAC3-A52A-42E4-81B2-F834664134EE.png
    35.7 KB · Views: 30
  • 255FBD6D-6876-4E08-9BDA-D2CEECB69B6F.png
    255FBD6D-6876-4E08-9BDA-D2CEECB69B6F.png
    38.9 KB · Views: 31
  • 6D3305FF-0710-453C-A479-07EFD0883ADB.png
    6D3305FF-0710-453C-A479-07EFD0883ADB.png
    52.1 KB · Views: 28
Last edited:
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top