But she was home with Z before he was 2 weeks old...she's a charlatanShe’s got #preemiestrong in the hashtags. What an awful person she is.
And in her stories “for the first couple of weeks of his life we had to have the help and permission of his nurses to touch him” he was in for a week. Stop trying to make it about you Beth, some babies are in for months or very sadly don’t get to go home.
Edited: did the maths as it doesn’t make sense : she did her weekly updates on Thursdays and was 33 weeks on Feb 25th. Z was born on March 26th so she was 37 + 1 on the day he was born. What part of that is being born in his 36th week?! Surely that’s considered his 37th week or am I just being a bit dense over here. Clearly it’s getting difficult for her to remember her lies, luckily we have receipts.
He was born on Friday 26/3 and home by Tuesday 6/4 ...so it wasn't 2 weeks before you could hold him, bec he was out of NICU well before then and not wired up to monitors ( there was even a photo her mum had posted
my sister's first son was born at 27 weeks ( over 40yrs ago) and sadly never made it home ....her subsequent pregnancies involved prolonged stays for both her and her preemies due to incompetent cervix .
....my eldest ended up in NICU and intubated for 48hrs and was largest baby there at 4kg!
I despise that Beth is using this false narrative to gain more followers and associated work ....oh for the world of influencers to come crashing down amongst their kindly gifted tat