BBC Presenter scandal #8 bum pics not allowed

How will the identity of the BBC Predator come out?

  • Person will own up / make a statement

    Votes: 307 32.6%

  • BBC News will finally report the truth from BBC News

    Votes: 85 9.0%

  • Parliamentary Privilege / PM QT

    Votes: 128 13.6%

  • GB News "mistake"

    Votes: 143 15.2%

  • Jeremy Vine will implode and say it

    Votes: 88 9.3%

  • Schofield will do an interview with him

    Votes: 29 3.1%

  • The Sun will just publish and be damned

    Votes: 163 17.3%
  • Total voters
    943
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
@InTheDollsHouse

I whole heartedly agree with you!
this is extremely concerning.
IMG_3192.jpeg

---
firefireemblem said:
Get him back on our screens already. Whole load of nothing.

Old closeted gay man wanted to trade his old wife in for a handsome, young homosexual -- of legal age.

He's done nothing illegal.
Click to expand...
Huw are you?
 
Kay's Good Cooking said:
Having worked with a lot of LGBTQ+ vulnerable teens/YAs, the sad reality is that lots do use OF to feed addictions/their own mental health. It's definitely a wider issue
Click to expand...
I know several gay and straight sex workers entered that life because of an addiction. But with some of them, you would never know just by looking at them that they had substance abuse issues so I don’t know how their punters can be blamed for paying into that addiction.
 
VielleFemme said:
@ImNotJeremyVine you joined this site at the weekend, since when you've posted 150 posts, almost all of them extremely long, and all of them on one subject only.

Yeah. Totally normal forum behaviour.
Click to expand...

Playing devils advocate, and as someone who joined in 2021 so who definitely didn’t join for this thread… didn’t we all join at one point for something? Let’s be real, Tattle can be very addictive. I dunno, I guess I just don’t like the calling out of new members for being new 🤷🏻‍♀️ Maybe you’re right, but could easily just be someone who has got very into the gossip of this thread.
 
firefireemblem said:
Get him back on our screens already. Whole load of nothing.

Old closeted gay man wanted to trade his old wife in for a handsome, young homosexual -- of legal age.

He's done nothing illegal.
Click to expand...
Hi Huw!

Just to clue you in, it’s kind of creepy and icky to be approaching much much MUCH younger (perhaps therefore vulnerable) men and then
threaten them over it.

Plus, I don’t think your wife is too impressed with you right now.

Angus Deyton and Schofe both lost their careers because people don’t want to watch sleazy twirps on tv. You are no exception.

Hope that helps!

Love,

The Internet
 
the Presenter will likely lose his job now anyway, so I could see the BBC and the Presenter releasing statements about this at the sine time or together at the end

jamesgets said:
Once again.
Since the police became involved, legally they can only reveal so much & nothing that could jeopardize any future trial.
Click to expand...
Yet they were more than happy to release that in the original article knowing full well that they were making allegations of criminal behaviour that should be investigated by the police. The Sun is scummy, they’d find a way to report this little development, unless they don’t know of it because the person(s) has gone to the BBC or the police themselves

A few threads ago people were writing essays about how the legal team at The Sun will have made this tight and ensured it’s all watertight but since then we have had reports of them distancing themselves from having made allegations of criminal behaviour which clearly shows they’re not so confident themselves about having made those claims to begin with
 
My colleagues are fond of describing the content of this call as “really interesting” - even under normal circumstances I’d challenge their definitions but when I’m suffering this at the expense of Tattle Time it’s particularly hard to swallow 🙈
 
Last edited:
Silverback said:
Hi Huw!

Just to clue you in, it’s kind of creepy and icky to be approaching much much MUCH younger (perhaps therefore vulnerable) men and then
threaten them over it.

Plus, I don’t think your wife is too impressed with you right now.

Angus Deyton and Schofe both lost their careers because people don’t want to watch sleazy twirps on tv. You are no exception.

Hope that helps!

Love,

The Internet
Click to expand...

Executive summary:

You’re a bad boy xxx
 
barabra cundy said:
The age when the pictures were taken hasn’t been confirmed.

how do you know that the person was aware of the drug addiction when sending the money?

you think drug addicts aren’t selling their pics/vids on OF to raise money for their next fix?
Click to expand...
you are right - the age of victim when pictures were sent hasnt been confirmed - because theres not been a court case (yet)
but you really are splitting the finest hair - the messages started when the victim was 17 according to his mother - from the date and the victims age now - its a simple calculation he was 17 - you seem very desperate to defend the bbc predator
[/QUOTE]
I’m not desperately defending at all.

However, I don’t agree with people saying the person in question should kill themselves. They haven’t been charged with anything, there has been no confirmation of anything illegal taking place. No one even knows the full story other than the parties involved.
 
stardust21 said:
Playing devils advocate, and as someone who joined in 2021 so who definitely didn’t join for this thread… didn’t we all join at one point for something? Let’s be real, Tattle can be very addictive. I dunno, I guess I just don’t like the calling out of new members for being new 🤷🏻‍♀️ Maybe you’re right, but could easily just be someone who has got very into the gossip of this thread.
Click to expand...
I'm not calling them out for being new.

I'm calling them out for joining the site just as this story broke publicly, with a username directly related to this story, and then very quickly posting over 150 long, detailed messages on only this subject, every single one of which has had exactly the same purpose - to exonerate the person in question, to smear their accusers, and to excuse and explain away and obfuscate every aspect of it.

Apparently even continuing to do this throughout the working day.

Come on...
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top