BBC Presenter scandal #8 bum pics not allowed

How will the identity of the BBC Predator come out?

  • Person will own up / make a statement

    Votes: 307 32.6%

  • BBC News will finally report the truth from BBC News

    Votes: 85 9.0%

  • Parliamentary Privilege / PM QT

    Votes: 128 13.6%

  • GB News "mistake"

    Votes: 143 15.2%

  • Jeremy Vine will implode and say it

    Votes: 88 9.3%

  • Schofield will do an interview with him

    Votes: 29 3.1%

  • The Sun will just publish and be damned

    Votes: 163 17.3%
  • Total voters
    943
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
FISHWIFE MODE ACTIVATED (are the MumsNet lot covering this btw?)

I think there's definitely a wider issue here, exceeding that of 'protecting onces'

I'm in two minds about it, but you can guarantee there are many Blues and Duws knocking one off to 'barely legal teens'. Scof and now this... who's going to be fucking next? Not a pun.
 
The thread got locked as I was writing this comment:


QUOTE="barabra cundy, post: 15914349, member: 270144"]
so you think they just got each others phone numbers by chance ?

he was 17 and hooked on drugs

for one thing its childporn
secondly a person addicted to drugs is hardly in a frame of mind to 'consent' anyway

dont compare this to OF ......
[/QUOTE]
The age when the pictures were taken hasn’t been confirmed.

how do you know that the person was aware of the drug addiction when sending the money?

you think drug addicts aren’t selling their pics/vids on OF to raise money for their next fix?
 
90sGal said:
But this person exercises impeccable judgement in their job. That much so they are respected by their employer to be given the public facing role they have and the huge responsibilityit comes with. (if who it is alleged)

I dont get it at all.

Something isn't right here.

And I'm not making light of it or defending any actions or being disrespectful to any victims here....just the why child in me is struggling with the WHY? And is the answer to the why worth the loss of everything?
Click to expand...
It’s a story as old as time, that will be playing out up and down the country. Most of the time the fact the treasurer of the local rotary club has been up before the beak for questionable activities will only make the local paper … but the loss in social standing and reputation will be the same.
 
kev1974 said:
Good summary from @Millennial Pink at the end of the last thread:

So, four people:

crack cocaine one
abusive messages one
tea party one
17 year old emoji one

The last thread is here

NO BUM PICS!! 😭


RIP Tattle advanced search ... basic thread title search is available on the home page.
Click to expand...
The search function has only been temporarily moved:

Site help, support and questions here - don't derail threads with offtopic tattle stuff ask here (name changes are not possible ever again!)

Hi, Currently a few issues with the site working slow and intermittently, they're being worked and will be resolved as soon as possible. A few things have been temp disabled like search while we work on it, (No need to reply to this message with anything, thanks!)
tattle.life
 
It sounds like the presenter was more than happy to gift money to people judging by the lockdown tea party person which may be why the Sun isn’t so certain about the claims they made of illegal behaviour originally - receiving money no longer means that the person engaged in certain behaviour

The gifting money situation is weird though, but it also sounds like it could be contained to a dating app which some have speculated could be linked to a sugar baby/daddy situation
 
From Beeb:


We've also been hearing from people on Nicky Campbell's 5 Live Breakfast show. In contast to Jeremy Vine's comments, media lawyer Paul Gilbert says: "There is no reason why the identity of this person should be revealed."

Giving his take on the allegations surrounding an unnamed BBC presenter, he describes them as "an issue for an employer" and none of our business "as the situation currently stands".

Gilbert says court decisions on privacy in recent years often show concern about "the adverse impact of the reporting of these stories on the person" as well as anyone else who "might be affected".

He adds that's why "we don't know the name of the presenter - and quite rightly so".


Love, the horse has bolted. WE ALL KNOW WHO IT IS.

Apart from the people still on thread one who are seriously considering Michael McIntyre or Mr Tumble.
 
Shamelesshorse said:
The age when the pictures were taken hasn’t been confirmed.

how do you know that the person was aware of the drug addiction when sending the money?

you think drug addicts aren’t selling their pics/vids on OF to raise money for their next fix?
Click to expand...

Having worked with a lot of LGBTQ+ vulnerable teens/YAs, the sad reality is that lots do use OF to feed addictions/their own mental health. It's definitely a wider issue
 
Merpedy said:
It sounds like the presenter was more than happy to gift money to people judging by the lockdown tea party person which may be why the Sun isn’t so certain about the claims they made of illegal behaviour originally - receiving money no longer means that the person engaged in certain behaviour

The gifting money situation is weird though, but it also sounds like it could be contained to a dating app which some have speculated could be linked to a sugar baby/daddy situation
Click to expand...
Once again.
Since the police became involved, legally they can only reveal so much & nothing that could jeopardize any future trial.
 
Shamelesshorse said:
The thread got locked as I was writing this comment:


QUOTE="barabra cundy, post: 15914349, member: 270144"]
so you think they just got each others phone numbers by chance ?

he was 17 and hooked on drugs

for one thing its childporn
secondly a person addicted to drugs is hardly in a frame of mind to 'consent' anyway

dont compare this to OF ......
Click to expand...
The age when the pictures were taken hasn’t been confirmed.

how do you know that the person was aware of the drug addiction when sending the money?

you think drug addicts aren’t selling their pics/vids on OF to raise money for their next fix?
[/QUOTE]
you are right - the age of victim when pictures were sent hasnt been confirmed - because theres not been a court case (yet)
but you really are splitting the finest hair - the messages started when the victim was 17 according to his mother - from the date and the victims age now - its a simple calculation he was 17 - you seem very desperate to defend the bbc predator
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top