Baby Reindeer Netflix

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1 Sort by date Sort by reaction score 2
wellwellwellitsanotherad said:
You don't need a law degree to be aware that once something is out there on the internet it's very much hard to get rid of some things.

That's why many professionals don't use their real names in practice. Lawyers that use maiden names etc. when a gang related case for example doesn't go as expected they don't want gangs searching for them online.

I used to live next door to someone who worked for the police and their surname online was the opposite to their real name for that very reason he gave statements in a lot of cases.

When we were at school be careful what you out online as it might not disappear if you delete it and still tell students that now.

A colleague of mine refuses to have anything online about him even linkedin etc because he doesn't trust the internet.

There used to be a process with Google that you could ask for anything related to you to be removed not sure if that's still the case.
Click to expand...

Yes, I meant she would be more likely to know how to get Google to remove things.

She must know the dangers of making claims about people online. She must.
---
The Devils Arse said:
If you use https://archive.ph/ and out in the link in the box below, it will bring up the article x
Click to expand...

Thank you!!
 
Gillybean42 said:
I wonder why she keeps mentioning his dad 🤔
Click to expand...
In the show every time she contacted RGs parents, his dad answered and gave her a mouthful, confronting her about the stalking/lies. I imagine that probably happened irl, especially given her previous and the fact she keeps mentioning him. She doesn’t like being confronted about her behaviour so he is probably on her hit list cause of that.
 
Wow read that sun article she is claiming to be a competent lawyer now that's an offence and if she tells the court she is that would also be contempt of court. It's likely she will get into trouble for that as it brings the industry into disrepute.

There is no way that 1 she is a lawyer and 2 that a judge would allow her to represent herself due to the way she comes across objectively they would want her to have a guardianship representative and have capacity assessments.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top