Baby Reindeer Netflix #2

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1 Sort by date Sort by reaction score 2
MrsNorthernGrinch said:
just loads of fake ones have started showing for me for some reason.. was just wondering if she’s posted anything about her interview with Piers?
Click to expand...
No nothing yet, she's not posted for 2 days.
Does anyone know where it will be shown - I don't watch his show. Don't like the guy at all but will be very interesting to see how she responds to direct questions where she can't just write a load of unintelligible waffle
 
judgejohndeed said:
No nothing yet, she's not posted for 2 days.
Does anyone know where it will be shown - I don't watch his show. Don't like the guy at all but will be very interesting to see how she responds to direct questions where she can't just write a load of unintelligible waffle
Click to expand...

supposedly his YouTube channel? That I didn’t know excisted. Am a bit worried for Piers she seems unpredictable
 
troutpout69 said:
Oh I’m so hear for this! She couldn’t have picked a better journalist to interview her and she’s already saying she isn’t happy! Ha ha serves the nasty piece of work right! I hope Pierce has a strong security system in place for when she starts hounding the hell out of him! 😂
Click to expand...
Funny isn't it, she wasn't happy with the other journalist after a while, even though at first she seemed to be happy with him...almost like she's the problem...Piers will be fine, now he is the type who would take action for stalking, libel etc
 
Curly said:
There would be an absolute uproar if it was a man that had stalked a woman and getting air time.
But because she’s a woman it’s deemed as entertainment. Giving her this platform will encourage her fairytale belief she hasn’t done anything wrong
Click to expand...
Not just stalked but sexually assaulted (unless that part was added to TV), but totally agree! A man would never be allowed on TV to garner sympathy, put his side over or whatever. It's disgraceful and triggering to her many victims.
 
emeraldopal said:
I suppose he can afford the security he and his family will need in the coming weeks, months, years, decades

Good luck Piers
Click to expand...
He better not offer her a drink 😆😆😆
---
Fee24601 said:
Agree she has a right to tell her story, if she hasn’t been convicted of a crime. No one is being forced to listen to her story, we all have a choice 👍
Click to expand...
Except she was convicted of a crime haha
 
Julinka81 said:
He better not offer her a drink 😆😆😆
---

Except she was convicted of a crime haha
Click to expand...

Oh sorry, I thought that bit was added for the Netflix series. I’m with the OP then, I don’t agree with her being platformed. My apologies!
---
judgejohndeed said:
She doesn't seem to have been convicted of a crime. I did actually search the other day. Laura Wray had a restraining order but that's not a criminal conviction
Click to expand...

Yeah that’s the bit I’m not sure about.

Despite my confusion, I do know where I draw the line: I wouldn’t personally want to give a platform to someone suspected of any form of abuse or assault, but if they haven’t been convicted by a court then they’re innocent in law and can talk about it freely. We don’t have to listen but they can talk! But if she’s been convicted, I don’t think she should be given the chance to spout off - the courts listened and convicted her. She’s had her chance to put her case across.
 
Fee24601 said:
Yeah that’s the bit I’m not sure about.

Despite my confusion, I do know where I draw the line: I wouldn’t personally want to give a platform to someone suspected of any form of abuse or assault, but if they haven’t been convicted by a court then they’re innocent in law and can talk about it freely. We don’t have to listen but they can talk! But if she’s been convicted, I don’t think she should be given the chance to spout off - the courts listened and convicted her. She’s had her chance to put her case across.
Click to expand...
I do understand this POV but would just say it's worth remembering that getting convicted of something like stalking, rape, DV etc is difficult, more so than other crimes, and just because someone has either not been in front of a court or has been in front of a court and got acquitted doesn't mean they haven't done the thing they've been accused of. We don't know how or why juries make decisions but we do know they often seem to ignore legal directions, and lots of people on juries have horrible/outdated views on sexual violence - for example, that men couldn't possibly be a victim of rape or stalking. I also agree with the person who pointed out that men who are accused of rape, stalking etc wouldn't get this kind of platform or 'chance to tell their side of the story'.
 
Fee24601 said:
Oh sorry, I thought that bit was added for the Netflix series. I’m with the OP then, I don’t agree with her being platformed. My apologies!
---


Yeah that’s the bit I’m not sure about.

Despite my confusion, I do know where I draw the line: I wouldn’t personally want to give a platform to someone suspected of any form of abuse or assault, but if they haven’t been convicted by a court then they’re innocent in law and can talk about it freely. We don’t have to listen but they can talk! But if she’s been convicted, I don’t think she should be given the chance to spout off - the courts listened and convicted her. She’s had her chance to put her case across.
Click to expand...

Sadly I do not think she has ever been convicted or even charged!
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top