AnnaRose Richards #4 Scamma's collection's sold 30%, but still not acknowledged by "boyfriend” Trent

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
WellAndWealthyBossBabe said:
Making a tit load of money in a short amount of time is not SuCcEsS. It means you e got to make that money streeeettttccchhhh over the years that your grifting is not successful. Good luck Scammy Annie. No wonder you always look like you are broke. Get a real job…much more lucrative to earn money DAILY, WEEKLY, MONTHLY than once every 10 years 🤣🤣🤣 and many of us have careers and our own successful businesses that we love and provide us financial stability and even wealth. Oh the lols at her version of sUcCess. Every single one of my girlfriends is kicking her ass in the areas that she thinks she eXceLLiNg in 🤣
Click to expand...
Also she will pay so much more tax getting it all in one lump! Tax that goes to the controlling lying government that she hates so much 🤪
 
babybuns88 said:
Also she will pay so much more tax getting it all in one lump! Tax that goes to the controlling lying government that she hates so much 🤪
Click to expand...

idiot probably thinks that, because it’s (the income from her TAW sales) is in a crypto wallet, she doesn’t need to pay tax on it until she converts it to $AUD. Wrong, Scammie. It’s income. The moment there’s a transaction from someone to you or your business - IN ANY FORM - you have to declare it and pay tax on it.

The ATO flagged back in March that it is tightening scrutiny on cryto transactions used for either investment or business purposes.
 
The 1950s called and want Carlz back.
In all seriousness though this woman is so full of hypocrisy that it blows my mind. Wasn’t it she who was comparing lockdowns to communist regimes? Like Carlz, you should have been grateful during the pandemic that you house door was boarded shut with you inside like they did in China! Like fark what are you complaining about? Just like women today should not complain about violence against women, gender pay gaps, unpaid domestic labour because there are women in other countries not who are 100 years behind us and not allowed to work (amongst other misogynistic things). Ps Carlz some countries are more progressive (your favourite word but you say it like it’s a bad thing) BECAUSE the fights have been fought by the “feminazis” Ps that term is highly offensive to those who were impacted by the nazi regime…but just keep spewing hate and wanting the world to go backwards.
 

Attachments

  • 52DB1274-F95C-4EFE-BD9B-084D59EC8A86.jpeg
    52DB1274-F95C-4EFE-BD9B-084D59EC8A86.jpeg
    57.1 KB · Views: 143
I wonder who this is? The “us” is very misleading. It’s not Trent. He doesn’t have tattoos. I think it’s someone from gymbros. I think they are collabing
 

Attachments

  • 6E54B640-4D7D-4E0B-91EC-856BAA0E295A.png
    6E54B640-4D7D-4E0B-91EC-856BAA0E295A.png
    120.9 KB · Views: 192
Oh please, yes we’ll stay in the Twitter space we don’t want to be in, but I’ll allude to something else to keep you all sucked in still

@pettybetty1 I feel she will have to colab or something because nothing she is trying is doing any good. They had their big start with so many having FOMO and now it’s just fizzled
 

Attachments

  • 0E1CECA0-C980-4DDC-A1A5-EF8113440B60.jpeg
    0E1CECA0-C980-4DDC-A1A5-EF8113440B60.jpeg
    77.3 KB · Views: 154
KrittyKat said:
yeah - she said something on her last live about doing a collab event with gymbros and arcadians.
Click to expand...

A lot of people do it, BUT isn't Anna being phenomenal and showing the world that SHE can sell out her NFT to a Web2 Community? Yet, she jumps on the back of quite popular Web3 Community NFT's already out there to get her name out.

Credit to the Archadians at least they 'give back' with their donations and it's not just all in their own pockets
 
livin_the_nuffy_life said:
Are these people just f#%king stupid or what?

Vaccines are not developed to essentially STOP transmission, but lower it and ease symptoms.
Click to expand...

And right on cue, Anna’s jumped on the bandwagon.

These bleeping people continue to prove why “doing your own research” is not smart!

Firstly, they have both misrepresented the context of what was said. The Pfizer vaccine wasn’t tested, and subsequently released, for its ability to reduce transmission - its use was in preventing severe disease which is what the vast majority of vaccines do (as @livin_the_nuffy_life pointed out). The exec was pointing this out - she was answering an anti vax European Parlimentarians question specifically with regard to him asking (paraphrasing) - was the vaccine tested for its effect on reducing transmission prior to release

Secondly, we now DO KNOW that the covid vaccine has a mild effect or reducing transmission

As someone else has already said, these bleeping nuffies ( Carlz and Anna) are happy to tell you not to believe the “main stream media” until they come across something - in the MSM - that vindicates them.

There is no doubt, that if you weren’t following it closely - and only following commercial media outlets - that you got a lot of incorrect information about covid and the vaccine. But for those people who had the time - and the interest - there WAS a whole lot of accurate reporting, that regularly updated their information - and pointed out previous errors/inaccuracies.

see what was said here (I can’t find the original reporting, just a report of the report! which for me means any commentary is already biased until the full transcript of what was said is released)

fism.tv

Pfizer exec appears to admit COVID vaccine not tested to prevent transmission - FISM TV

The bombshell admission came during a European Parliament committee meeting after Dutch Member of European Parliament (MEP) Rob Roos asked Pfizer President of International Developed Markets Janine Small directly about the testing.
fism.tv fism.tv

and link to studies showing mild effect on transmission here
www.who.int

The Pfizer BioNTech (BNT162b2) COVID-19 vaccine: What you need to know

This article provides a summary of the interim recommendations for the use of the Pfizer BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine against COVID-19 issued by WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE).
www.who.int www.who.int
 
pettybetty1 said:
Anna babe this isn’t going to help. You look like a leather glove.
Click to expand...

OMG what the duck is that - Screams Halloween lol

KrittyKat said:
And right on cue, Anna’s jumped on the bandwagon.

These bleeping people continue to prove why “doing your own research” is not smart!

Firstly, they have both misrepresented the context of what was said. The Pfizer vaccine wasn’t tested, and subsequently released, for its ability to reduce transmission - its use was in preventing severe disease which is what the vast majority of vaccines do (as @livin_the_nuffy_life pointed out). The exec was pointing this out - she was answering an anti vax European Parlimentarians question specifically with regard to him asking (paraphrasing) - was the vaccine tested for its effect on reducing transmission prior to release

Secondly, we now DO KNOW that the covid vaccine has a mild effect or reducing transmission

As someone else has already said, these bleeping nuffies ( Carlz and Anna) are happy to tell you not to believe the “main stream media” until they come across something - in the MSM - that vindicates them.

There is no doubt, that if you weren’t following it closely - and only following commercial media outlets - that you got a lot of incorrect information about covid and the vaccine. But for those people who had the time - and the interest - there WAS a whole lot of accurate reporting, that regularly updated their information - and pointed out previous errors/inaccuracies.

see what was said here (I can’t find the original reporting, just a report of the report! which for me means any commentary is already biased until the full transcript of what was said is released)

fism.tv

Pfizer exec appears to admit COVID vaccine not tested to prevent transmission - FISM TV

The bombshell admission came during a European Parliament committee meeting after Dutch Member of European Parliament (MEP) Rob Roos asked Pfizer President of International Developed Markets Janine Small directly about the testing.
fism.tv fism.tv

and link to studies showing mild effect on transmission here
www.who.int

The Pfizer BioNTech (BNT162b2) COVID-19 vaccine: What you need to know

This article provides a summary of the interim recommendations for the use of the Pfizer BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine against COVID-19 issued by WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE).
www.who.int www.who.int
Click to expand...

Totally agree, they take exactly what they feel will make their little story be true and not include in the bigger context, having said that, isn't that just how she managed to swing all her bullshit to start with.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top